Old reviews from Siren's Song Reviews.

Order:
Newest reviews are at the top.
Oldest reviews are at the bottom.

Enjoy!
Total: 81
Amy's B. B. Elements Grantauy's AIOG Paint Your Future Vintage Renewal Eye of the Faerie The Panda Page Amethyst Pages Usul Amazings Charlie's Graphics No Sweat NP Circus Face Paint Cristina's M.C. RR Zoloia's F.B. Ace Faerie Fountain C.C. Premades Lauren's 100k ADG MS Paint Guide Creating A P.P. Bobo Banners Site Lindsey's Icons My Blinkie Site Otaku Works Cristina's M.C. Pixelburgh, PA KandyKanes Sarah's NP Guide Graphics B. D. Superfly CSS Popsicle Premades Anime Ike RR Ready Set Gr. Curious Girl De. Spellbound 2nd Star - Right Syd's Buttons Photo Finish De. Casanova* Baybeluv08's M+I Anime Block Splashout Designs Angel's Dailies Toxic Exhilaration Destiny Devine Rainbow Tears RR Mel's Customs Siddey's String RR Pup's Premades Katherine's Bl. Cursors by Design Twinkle Graphics 2 Stars Gr. RR Blinking Lookups PixelFreak Starry_Mimi's Da. Pixel Dust Fresh Directory Rainbow Tears Signature Requests Futago GraphX AnimeIke 2 Starz Graphix Jemz Premades Faerie Compass Good and Broken Siddey's String RR Faerilis Graphics Soroptimist Di. Tips 4 Suc. Kandy Crush Gr. Twiztid Shrooms Siddey's String Disney An. & M. SCC Nyponte's Ad. Tina's Graphics Precious Dreams Stormie Graphics Pitty's Glitters Pepsojr's BGs




Amy's Button Basket


Reviewed on April 24, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 7/10. When I read your site name, I was expecting to find a bright, colorful page. Instead, I find a simple blue-and-white layout in a very tiny scrollbox. The scrollbox is really the right size for the site, though...although the navigation links could be a bit..."narrower?" Is that the word I'm looking for? Well, they could be smaller. They look too big when compared to the box size.

Spelling 5/5. I didn't see any spelling errors.

Grammar: 2/5. You do have a few too many grammatical mistakes. First of all, don't capitalize words in the middle of a sentence {example: and a button Request!}. Second, refrain from using sentence fragments {example: Got one request!}. Not only are fragments unappealing, but they aren't grammatically correct!

There was a sentence that I really didn't understand as well. Welcome to Amy's Button Basket! This site is a request site for buttons! I do not make buttons with animations, and I think still buttons are also unique. What are you trying to say here? I think it would be better if you reworded it to say something like: Welcome to Amy's Button Basket! This is a request site for buttons. I do not make buttons with animations because I think that still buttons are unique. That would make more sense.

Neatness: 9/10. It's pretty easy to find your way around the site, but why on earth are the newest requests at the bottom of your page? It would be easier for people to pick up their requests if they were able to just go straight to the page & pick up the request without being able to scroll.

Colors: 8/10. It's very simple, but it's also quite cute! After staring at the page for a while, it grows on you!

Music: 10/10. Very nice. No music!

Age of Site: 9/10. You have plenty of request pick ups, and you update quite often. That's very nice!

Quality: 10/10. Your buttons are very cute, especially the "bubble" ones. They're nice! You certainly know what you're doing.

Updated List: 9/10. While you do have many updates, they're getting quite...scanty. When you first started updating, you at least mentioned the site that you were making the button for; you don't do that anymore. Instead, you have reverted to sentence fragments. "Got one request." Where's the pride in that?!

Other Problems: Grammatical issues aside, the only thing that I can think of is changing the navigation link that says "Extra" to "Reviews."

Overall Score: 69/80. That's an 86%! Great job, considering that this is only your second review!
Back to Top

Elements

Reviewed on April 11, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 10/10. Wow. The top banner is simple, yet it draws you in. The background is stunning, and it matches the whole "nature" theme that you have. The three column layout is composed of subtle earth-y tones, yet it stands out. I love it!

Spelling 4/5. You have no spelling mistakes in your actual content, but you made a grave mistake: misspelling the name of the site that made your second link-back button. It should be Creative Chaos, NOT Creative Choas.

Grammar: 4/5. There are a few grammatical errors floating around! For example, in your introductory paragraph where you say "if you want to be affiliate," there should either be an 's' at the end of 'affiliates', or the word 'an' before the word 'affiliates.' Either of these ways will work.

In your updates, you say "sent in lots review requests," which is incorrect. It should either be 'sent in a lot of review requests' or 'sent in lots of review requests.' Otherwise, great job!

Neatness: 9/10. You could shorten your 'Requests' scrollbox so that it matches the length of the 'glitters' boxes. Otherwise, everything matches rather nice.

Colors: 9/10. Like I said before, everything looks fantastic! You could benefit from one thing, however. Try eyedropping colors from your bamboo banner {the different shades of green} to use for your bold/italic/underline/link colors. Those would match your layout better.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic! Music on petpages is incredibly annoying; great job on keeping yours music-free!

Age of Site: 10/10. You update frequently, you have a good number of hits on your counter, and you have plenty of graphics for only being open fourteen days or so! The only thing that seems to be missing, however, is the date that your state started. You could say "Elements was started on -----" somewhere on your site. I do see that in your updates {at the bottom} you say the date that Elements was started, but you need that date somewhere prominent on your page; even putting it above/below your counter would work!

Quality: 9/10. There are some glittered areas {like the white/gray/light blue} that look like they have black ants crawling all over them. Try not to glitter the light areas; do the darker areas. Your link-back buttons have a problem too. They're all really nice, but none of them are made by you. If you're going to have a graphics site, you should make at least 75% of your link-back buttons.

Updated List: 10/10. You update frequently and thoroughly. Great job!

Other Problems: Really, the only problem that I can see is that you haven't made any of your link-back buttons. Other than that, you're fine!

Overall Score: 75/80. That is a 93%! Great job for only being open fourteen or so days!
Back to Top

Grantauy's All-in-One Guide


Reviewed on April 11, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 9/10. The layout is very cute, but I don't understand why you chose to have green text on your page. Why not try a dark blue; something that would match your layout?

Spelling 5/5. Amazing. I did not find a single spelling error while checking your page! Great job.

Grammar: 4/5. Aside from the amazing spelling skills, you had a few grammatical mistakes. I only saw one, however, so you didn't lose that many points! You simply said "an day" instead of "a day", but don't let that get you down!

Neatness: 10/10. Another ringer on this one! Your site is easy to get around; that's great.

Colors: 9/10. I just don't understand why you chose to have a green font. A black one would have been better. A dark-blue one would have matched the rest of your page! Why did you settle on green?

Music: 10/10. Perfect. *leans back and closes eyes* No music to distract me from my own!

Age of Site: 9/10. Uh-oh. Where's the date that you started your site? I can find the date that you started your counter {always an important thing!}, but there is nothing to say when your site was started! That's an important date; where in Neopia did it go?

Updated List: 9/10. Wow - that's a good number of updates! And you even post the last time that you updated {including the time of day!} on top of the updates box! Fantastic! *does a jig*

Other Problems: None that I could see! You've done a great job!

Overall Score: 65/70. That's a 93%! Congratulations! You have an awesome site; I can't wait to see it when it's completed! While I was reviewing your site, your "Who else is on?" counter showed 7 people at that time as well - you must be doing something right! Keep going!
Back to Top

Paint Your Future


Reviewed on April 11, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 9/10. It is a cool-looking banner; however, there are little pixels of white space floating around the paint brushes on the left-hand side. What happened there? If you are going to make a banner, be sure to go all the way around white spaces and get rid of them!

Spelling 4/5. I caught a few spelling mistakes; there were three spelling mistakes, and two of them were the same word: "receiving." The "e" goes before the "i." The third mistake was the word "apparent", which you spelled with an "a" instead of an "e" at the end. Otherwise, everything was fine!

Grammar: 4/5. There were a few grammatical mistakes, I'm afraid, mostly involving apostrophes. For example, you use "it's," the contraction form instead of "its" a lot.

Neatness: 9/10. Your site is easy to navigate around; I found everything that I needed quickly. The only thing that I can think to add is to put your "Updates" section in a scrolling box under a separate header.

Colors: 9/10. They matched rather well.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic.

Age of Site: 4/10. Your site doesn't have the date that it opened on it! What happened to that date? That is one of the most important dates that your site can possibly have!! For Sloth's sake, get that date somewhere on there! And another thing, where are all the updates?! Don't tell me that you've only updated five times in the past {almost} two months! I want to see some updates! You should also have a few more affiliates than the two that you have; affiliates help advertise your site. Don't sit around waiting for people to ask to be affiliates with you; go out there and get them! Your hit counter will go up dramatically!

Quality: 8/10. I'm assuming that all of the link-back buttons were made by you, in which case I feel comfortable enough to say that they need some work. The first one is rather nice, but you can't see the words on it at all! The second one is good as well, but the words "Paint" and "Your" seem so close together that the name of your site appears to be "PaintYour Future." The third one has some weird bulges in the text; what's up with that? The fourth one is okay, though. It could be better, but it's okay for now.

Updated List: 4/10. You have only five updates? Don't tell me that you've either forgotten about your site/have deleted them. It's not nice to delete your updates, or to forget to update. If you don't update frequently, people may think that you no longer bother to update the site, and will lose interest in the site {"Oh, there's nothing new here; the guy hasn't updated in nearly two months. Maybe there's another NP guide out there somewhere?"} and won't come back.

Other Problems: Where's your credit section? Who made your layout? In your updates, you say, "Brand new custom layout!" but you do not say who that layout is from. Where'd it come from? And where is it going? Only time will tell.

Overall Score: 61/80. That is a 76%. Not bad for your first review! Just fix up a few things. Your site has a lot of potential; you just need to unlock it.
Back to Top

Vintage Renewal Directory


Reviewed on April 11, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 7/10. What's with the car? It doesn't really fit in with the image that I had of "vintage." I think of vintage as old clothes, or old jewelery or something like that; not cars. The background is neat, though; it looks like a street!

Spelling 4/5. I caught a few mistakes! In your introductory paragraph, you say "Genral", which I am guessing is supposed to mean "General." Spell it correctly, please!

In your Credits section, you have "Fourth" spelled as "Forth", which would be appropriate if you were saying, "We put forth our feet onto solid ground!" Fix it!

Grammar: 3/5. There are several instances when you do not capitalize words/sentences, such as in your Updates box. Capitalization is what separates the men from the beasts!

You should also say "Untaken" names instead of "Un-used" names. If you insist on the "Un-used" portion, take out the hyphen, so it looks like "unused."

There should be a space between punctuation and the beginning of the next sentence; there are several instances when you do not do this. Please add those spaces!

Neatness: 8/10. It was rather neat; I could find everything easily. However, you should consider finding a two-column layout for your site; that would make it easier for people to navigate your site and find your link-back buttons.

There is another cause for the deduction of points, however: one of your link-back buttons has been deleted from Photobucket. I suggest you delete the link-back button from your page.

Colors: 9/10. The colors are nice, and I like how you use a dark red instead of a blinding neon red for your bold links. However, you could most likely change your italics to a dark red as well.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic. *leans back in bliss and listens to Green Day* Great job on keeping your page music-free.

Age of Site: 5/10. I gleaned from your updates section that you opened on March 7, 2009. Why, then, is there no mention of that date anywhere on your site? You should say somewhere that you opened your site on March 7th. You should also put the date that you started your counter underneath your counter! These are some very important dates; I'm surprised that none of the other review sites you've applied for have mentioned this!

Updated List: 7/10. There are some pretty big gaps in your updating; you don't even tell us that you will be going on hiatus! I will admit that my directory has some gaps in it as well, but I give explanations for my absences. You could do well to explain things in your updates instead of just, "One site added. One new affie." Those are boring updates!

Other Problems: Please, please, please do not put me underneath "affiliates!" I am not your affiliate, I am your reviewer. I belong underneath a separate "reviews" section, not the affiliates section!

Overall Score: 53/70. That is a 75%; not a bad score considering that this was your first time being reviewed by me. Just clean up your site a little more. You have a great site!
Back to Top

The Eye of the Faerie


Reviewed on March 31, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. It seems a little...busy. I was also expecting there to be a header-banner somewhere. I think you should get a header-banner, and maybe get a better image than that origami flapping bird-thing that you have next to the Get Listed form.

Spelling 4/5. I saw a few mistakes, mainly that you spelled asterisk as "asterick". In the following two sentences, there are two spelling errors:

All you have to do is use the form, and immidiantly link back to my site, and your site must be appropriete!
You misspelled the word "immediately" and the word "appropriate".

Also, the site The Faerie Compass doesn't have an apostrophe in it; you repetitively call it The Faerie's Compass, which it is not.

Grammar: 3/5. You have a lot of grammatical mistakes! Here are a few that I found:

They would secretly disguise as a neopian, just like us and just guide them throughout neopia.
What you need to do here is put the word "themselves" after the word "disguise"; a comma after the word "us"; and delete the word "just".

This site will help you neopians, find the places and links you will need!
Here, you need to delete the word "Neopians", and delete the word "will".

I technically have no rules really, and this is a really big change! All you have to do is use the form, and immidiantly link back to my site, and your site must be appropriete! Here is the form, which you use to send in.
Delete the word "really"; delete the word "and" after "form"; and change the last sentence to "Here is the form to submit your site".

And I tried making a comeback to the directories world, but failed. So I decided its time for my directories site to emerge back up!
Never begin a sentence with the word "and" unless it is absolutely necessary, and it is not necessary here. There should be a comma in the word "its", because it means, "it is". You used the possessive form, which is not the correct form.

Those are just a few examples that I found - and those are the first two sentences in the site! It's not good if your site is laced with grammatical errors; it turns people off.

Neatness: 9/10. Everything seems to have its proper place, although you could have some "Back to Top" links after each section.

Colors: 9/10. Everything matches rather nicely, although instead of that big, yellow Neopets envelope for the "Neomail Me" link, you could find a pixel envelope somewhere, or make one yourself. That's just a suggestion.

Music: 10/10. Yes! *does a victory dance* No music!!

Age of Site: 9/10. You have a good number of listings and updates for your site, and a great amount of hits!

Quality: Category dropped because this is a directory; your score will be out of 70 instead of 80.

Updated List: 7/10. You have a few large gaps between updates - I know that my directory does too, but that is because I was away on vacation or was busy with schoolwork and had no time to get on Neopets. You should always try to update daily - even if it's just changing a few minuscule things around the site. Don't forget to update!

Other Problems: The dragon counter could possibly be a color other than orange....It just looks weird.

Overall Score: 59/79. That's an 84%! Congratulations! You have a good site; you just need to work on your grammatical skills, okay?
Back to Top

The Panda Pages


Reviewed on March 14, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. The bright pink banner looks out of place; maybe make a banner that's not quite so bright and matches the rest of your layout?

Spelling 4/5. You must never, ever spell "Graphics" as "graphix", otherwise people will never take you seriously.

Grammar: 5/5. I could not find anything wrong with your grammar.

Neatness: 9/10. You may want to add some "Back to Top" links somewhere on your page, even though your page isn't that long. Back to Top buttons take a lot of scrolling out of the way!

Colors: 9/10. The pink banner is out of place. Try making one that matches the layout, maybe in blues and oranges?

Music: 10/10. Great! No music! Music on petpages is incredibly annoying; I can't tell you how annoying it is!!

Age of Site: 8/10. You seem to update frequently, but there could be a few more. You could also benefit from a counter! You do have a number of graphics, but they are incredibly easy to do - all you have to do is steal them off of photobucket. Speaking of which....

Quality: 1/10. You state very clearly in your credits that the graphics "are either from tinypic or photobucket." What? That's not good at all! If you're going to have a graphics page, make your own graphics!! Otherwise, you are stealing graphics from the person who actually made them! WHy on earth would you do that?! Unless you give credit, name by name, and ask permission from each and every person you took a graphic from to put it on your page, you are STEALING their graphics, and are committing the horrible crime of copyright infringement!! Also, since these are NOT your graphics, you do NOT have to make them link back to your site!! And, what I find in a striking bit of irony, you say "Do NOT steal" when, in fact, it is YOU who has been stealing!

Your userlookups look great, however. Great job!

Updated List: 9/10. You do update frequently, but why on earth is "March 10" beforeMarch 9"? That makes no sense, unless you travelled through time.... Also, you don't have to add the text areas when you are putting your link-back buttons in your updates box. You just need to put the images.

Other Problems: Please do not list me underneath "Affies". Affies are not review sites, normally. Affies are people that you ask for opinions, and they are your friends. Reviewers are people who normally do not know you {so they can give you an unprejudiced opinion}, and do not need to be put under "Affies". Make a separate section for reviewers! Also, remember that you must never steal graphics from other people without giving credit to the original owner!!

Overall Score: 63/80. That's a 78%! Not bad for your first review from me! Keep working on your site - you're going to need a lot of work to put your site up. That means learning how to make graphics on your own without stealing them from Photobucket or Tinypic. Might I suggest GIMP? It's a great free program. If you need help {or just want to see a quick overview of what it might do}, click here.
Back to Top

The Amethyst Pages


Reviewed on March 14, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. The purple and black layout is nice, and it really matches the "mood" of your name. The background, however, only showed up when I opened your site in FireFox. When I opened it in Internet Explorer, the background showed up as white. After six refreshings, the background still didn't show up. You might want to look in to that.

Spelling 5/5. I didn't see anything. Great job!

Grammar: 5/5. I didn't see anything!

Neatness: 4/10. The top part of the page is organized fantastically; the bottom part, not so much. Why? It's simple, really. Almost all of the buttons are a different size, and the page takes forever to load. Might I suggest you either switch to all 88x31 buttons, or to all text links? Speaking of text links, why do you have both buttons and text links? That makes no sense; choose one, and stick with it! In fact, I think your page would look much better if you had all text links!

Colors: 9/10. As I said before, they look great together! However, your background refuses to show up in Internet Explorer for me. It looks fine in FireFox, though. Internet Explorer apparently doesn't like your page! Maybe switching to a solid purple background would help?

Music: 10/10. You said in your neomail that you had music on your petpage, however I heard no music {even after turning my speakers up all the way}, so I'm giving you full credit here!

Age of Site: 8/10. While you have a good amount of text in your updates, and you have a lot of sites listed, you don't have the date that your site was started! I couldn't find that date anywhere! Unless I overlooked it while scouring your page, {and I doubt I did} I suggest you add that date to your page somewhere.

Quality: See Neatness. You will be getting a score --/70, because directories cannot be scored very well on "Quality."

Updated List: 7/10. You try to cram a week's worth of updates into one. That's not good. You should update on the day that you add new pages, not once a week! That way, you can easily space out your updates, and you won't have to go back and try to remember which pages you've added over the week!

Other Problems: Just the IE-resistant background & the weird smattering of petpage buttons. I would suggest switching to all text links if I were you, OR to a strict 88x31 "listing button" regulation.

Overall Score: 57/70. That's an 81%! Congratulations! Keep working on your page!
Back to Top

Usul Amazings


Reviewed on March 14, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. The blue "blog" doesn't really match your purple background, and the punctuation errors sort of turn me off.

Spelling 5/5. There are no spelling errors that I could see.

Grammar: 0/5. There are too many grammatical mistakes to count. When you end a sentence, there must be a space between the punctuation and the beginning of the next sentence! The same rule applies for commas. Don't squish everything together! The page is must easier to read if you make sure that you punctuate and apply spaces correctly!

Neatness: 7/10. You should probably have some sort of navigation bar somewhere on your page, so people don't have to scroll all the way down, then turn around and scroll all the way back up! Also, please add the border="0" code in your image coding; that will get rid of the ugly blue/purple borders around your icons!

Colors: 6/10. You could probably change the background to either white or a light blue, so it matches your blog layout. Otherwise, your page looks awkward. The purple doesn't match the blue at all!

Music: 10/10. Perfect! Music on petpages is often annoying, not to mention that many people are already listening to music and do not want your music to interfere with theirs.

Age of Site: 4/10. For being up about three or four weeks, you don't have very many graphics, and your updates are....lacking. You also don't have the date that your site started anywhere on your page, but you do have the date that you started your counter. Unless you started the counter on the same day you started your site, I would suggest putting the date you opened your site somewhere on your page, preferably near the top of the page.

Quality: 2/10. The icons are amateur-ish at best, and at worst....well, they're not the best I've ever seen. It seems as if you use Microsoft Paint for your graphics; that is not the best program out there. Sure, some people can create amazing things with that program, but personally, I would recommend the graphic program GIMP. If you have any questions about it, refer to this guide: Kitty's GIMP Tutorial. That will help you with GIMP, or give you an overview of it if you want to know more about it. Your link-back buttons could also use a lot of work. Try not to make any buttons that exceed the recommended dimensions {88 x 31 pixels}. There are several button-request sites out there that can make quality link-back buttons for your site!

Updated List: 2/10. You've been open for about three or four weeks, but you only have three updates? What happened to the rest of them? A graphic site is a site that you have to put a lot of work and thought into; if you don't have updates, how will your potential "customers" know what you've done to the site? You should try to update every time you change something about the site, no matter how insignificant it might seem!

Other Problems: I would suggest getting a better graphics program {there are several quality free program out there!!} & updating a lot more. With some work, you can rise to the top! Keep going!

Overall Score: 44/80. That's a 55%! Congratulations! That's not bad for your first review from me! Just put a little more time and effort into your site, and you'll have an awesome one!
Back to Top

Charlie's Graphics


Reviewed on March 9, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 7/10. Your link-back buttons & your review section does NOT need to be the first thing I see! I should be seeing your welcome message, etc., and your navigation; NOT your "fluffies" for your site! Those should go near the bottom of the sidebar - not at the very top!

Spelling/Grammar: 6/10. You have a LOT of run-on sentences - make sure you put some punctuation in, okay? Punctuation makes everything nice & neat. If you're not sure on how to spell something, copy & paste it into MS Word and see if their spell-checker brings up anything.

Neatness: 7/10. As I said before, you should have your link-back buttons, reviews, and affiliates sections near the bottom of the side column. Getting some navigation won't hurt either {in-site navigation; e.g. page anchors}, as well as getting rid of all of those blue borders around some of the graphics, like the ones in your "Reviews" section, & the border around your pixel envelope.

Colors: 8/10. It's quite purple, but Sakura does add a slight splash of color to your page.

Music: 6/10. It's incredibly annoying, actually....When I was looking at your neomail, you said that you didn't have music on your page, so I opened it up thinking that there would be no music. Lo and behold, the music blasted me out of my chair. Apparently my sister didn't turn down the speakers after watching her last Fred video. Music distracts from the graphics...and if some people are really annoyed by the music, they may shut out your page, never to return. You have been warned.

Age of Site: 5/10. You have a good number of hits & updates...but since most of your content seems to be from Photobucket, I cannot give you full credit here. It takes about three seconds to upload something from photobucket onto your page, end of story.

Quality: 2/10. If you made your images, I could have given you credit for this...but you said "images credited to photobucket", and by looking at your incredibly diverse selection of icons & your Staff descriptions... "Finds/makes blinkies and banners", it just seems shady to me. But you had to have made at least a few things on this page....right? Please tell me I'm right. Stealing is wrong {UNLESS you have FULL CREDIT to the person who ORIGINALLY made the graphic, you are STEALING said graphic from them}, and it's a bad shame if you steal things from photobucket, slap it on a petpage, and call it a graphics site. Shame, shame. Also, you shouldn't/can't ask people to link those PHOTOBUCKET'd icons back to your site, because you did not make the icons, and if they took the link-back off it wouldn't matter anyways. There are millions of these "fake graphic sites" out on Neopets - why is yours any different?

Updated List: 8/10. There are a few giant gaps between your updates, but you seem to update frequently & thoroughly. {Side note: "Ciao" is not spelled as "Chau", like you spelled it.}

Other Problems: The photobucket-stealing is the biggest thing. If you have not taken anything from photobucket at all, let me know & I'll redo your score, but being that as it is {and the fact that I recognized several icons from my friend's accounts}, I doubt you'll score much higher.

Overall Score: 49/80. That's a 61%. Not bad for your first review from me! If you can get rid of the photobucket icons and learn how to make your own...that'd be absolutely perfect!
Back to Top

No Sweat Neopoints


Reviewed on March 4, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 9/10. It's a bit too bright-green for my eyes, but it looks like this will be a very well-organized site. I hope it will be! The main page just draws you in, and makes you want to delve in deeper!

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. I saw a few mistakes. On your main page, you say -This guide will help you make a minimum 40k a day-. It should be "a minimum of 40k a day". On your "Getting Started" page, you say -Now, if your new to using this guide, here is a list of somethings that you will need to do to make the guide work best as possible-. In this sentence, your should be YOU'RE, as in, "You Are." Also, somethings on the same page should be "some things". There should be as pace between "some" and "things", mind you! Make sure you put apostrophes where you are supposed to put apostrophes, and capitalize words at the beginning of a sentence!

Neatness: 10/10. Everything is well-organized and easy to find. That's perfect!

Colors: 9/10. Although the green is a little blinding when you first open up the page, your eyes get used to it after a while, and it really matches the "tone" of your site.

Music: 10/10. Yay! No music! That is absolutely fantastic.

Age of Site: 7/10. You do have a counter, but there is no indication as to when you actually started the counter, and you have a pitiful amount of updates. Also, with your "Other Ways to make NP" section, you say that it is Under Construction and will be up in February. February has passed us by!

Quality: 10/10. Although I was a little confused as to why a few of the images are washed out until you roll over them, while all others are perfectly fine, I found that your site was easy to get around and was very informational.

Updated List: 2/10. You've been open for more than two years you say, and yet you have just a few updates? What gives? You should never, ever delete your updates! There is always something to update with Neopoint Guides - Game Neopoint Ratios, Sponser Games, etc., so that's no excuse for having only six updates after two years!

Other Problems: Really nothing except the updates. What happened to all of them, I wonder? Oh, and your spelling. Make sure that you check everything over before you save your petpage!

Overall Score: 65/80. That's an 81%! Congratulations! Your site is neat and informative - that's all people want from a Neopoints guide, but you can always go the extra mile and add other things! Keep going at it!
Back to Top

Circus


Reviewed on March 3, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. When I first loaded it, the background image didn't load, so after I scrolled down and saw some broken images, I simply clicked refresh...and then the yellow background popped up x.x Your site could do without the background, if you wish. The background really doesn't match the header-banner.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything, but there's something that you can rethink: your introductory paragraph. You say the word "Circus" a lot - I know that's the name of your site, but you don't have to work it into every sentence!

Neatness: 9/10. Everything's well laid-out, but one thing bothers me - you've grouped the Pet Directories and Link Directories together, so people have to guess which are pet directories and which are link directories. The correct thing to do would be to split the group into two groups - "link directories" and "pet directories". It would help clean up the site.

Colors: 9/10. Your header-banner doesn't really match the layout of your site. It's all shades of red, while your site is mostly shades of yellow and orange. How did that happen? Either redo your site so it looks more red {to match your banner} or redo your banner so it looks more yellow-ish {to match your layout}.

Music: 10/10. I don't hear any music, although you said that you have music on your page. I even turned my speakers up to 100%, and nothing came out, so I'm giving you full credit in this category!

Age of Site: 10/10. You have plenty of updates, and you have a hit counter. And as if that's not enough, you even have the words "Establish on this date" at the top! That's the best thing in the world for a reviewer to see!

Quality: 8/10. Your links are well-organized {with the exception of the "directories" category} and everything seems to be in working order. The only thing wrong with this category would have to be the weird mismatched colors of the layout. Pick one! Red Banner with Red layout, or Yellow Banner with Yellow layout? Pick one and stick with it!

Updated List: 8/10. There are several immense gaps between some updates {one of them went from Feb. 7 to Feb. 20 in half a scroll!}...what happened there? Did you run out of things to say? Even if you don't have anything to do, you can always check to make sure all of your links are working!

Other Problems: Really, the only thing is the weird color-clash. Try picking one and sticking with it! Personally, I think you should remake the site in shades of red - red seems more Circus-y to me! But, of course, it's your choice!

Overall Score: 73/80. That's a 91%! Congratulations! Your site is great, but as with all sites, there's always room for improvement! Keep working on it; you have an award-winning site here!
Back to Top

Face Paint


Reviewed on March 1, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 10/10. It's nice and clean, although the overload of purple nearly got me! It's a very pretty site, and it draws me in. The layout makes me want to explore some more.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I did not see anything! You must be a fantastic speller!

Neatness: 9/10. Everything's nicely laid out - you even have separate sections for the people who reviewed you! The only thing your site could possibly benefit from is a few "Back to Top" links.

Colors: 9/10. It's a lot of purple, that's for sure, but it's not overwhelmingly purple. However, your hit counter could use a different outline color. I can barely make out the numbers!

Music: 10/10. Perfect! No music!! I can't tell you how many times I've been annoyed by music on petpages, but you kept your petpage music-free! Perfect!

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a good number of listings, hits, and updates. That's nice. You're on top of your game, and you know what to do.

Quality: 10/10. Since I can't grade you the way I grade other sites {such as graphic sites}, the best thing I can do is check your links, etc., to see if they're working. And they all do! You are definitely on top of your game!

Updated List: 10/10. Fantastic! You update frequently, and you explain things. Great!!

Other Problems: The only thing that could possibly need fixing is your hit counter. The outline color could be made a little darker. But otherwise, it's perfect!

Overall Score: 78/80. That's a 98%. Great job! Keep working on your site; you have a perfect one here!
Back to Top

Cristina's Music Codes


Reviewed on March 1, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. Very cute, although your columns are a little...lopsided. Your left column is closer to your middle column than your right column is! Is that supposed to be like that?

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I did not find anything.

Neatness: 9/10. You have everything organized alphabetically, and even give tips on how to get around your site. Good job making your site easy to get around. The only thing that I find awkward/weird is your column layout. They're not the same distance apart.

Colors: 9/10. The yellow font looks a bit out of place....But otherwise everything looks great!

Music: 0/10. Since this is a music codes site, you sorta have to have music playing. But you might want to consider having something soft play, instead of whatever-the-heck-it-is you have playing now. It sounds like a guy's trying to talk past a boulder in his mouth! A good example of a soft music code is "Wake me when September Ends" by Green Day.

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a LOT of music codes, and your updates are very, very descriptive.

Quality: 10/10. I can't exactly grade you like I would a graphics site, dailies site, or directory, so I'll have to say that everything works. I have nothing to go with, so I'll just say that everything works {because if it didn't, where would the site go?} and since everything's a full song, I'll give you the full 10/10 for this section.

Updated List: 10/10. Such a change from the last time I reviewed you! This time, your updates are descriptive, and you actually /have/ updates! Great job!

Other Problems: I hope you know that redistributing music codes WITHOUT written permission from the original artist is copyright infringement. If you redistribute the music WITHOUT paying the original artist, you are technically stealing music and money from them, which is illegal. Music codes themselves are illegal if you get them from someone who is redistributing them. A music code made by YOU for YOUR OWN PERSONAL USE is not breaking the rules, because you bought the music & will be using it for YOUR ENJOYMENT. Buying the music JUST TO MAKE MUSIC CODES FOR OTHERS, however, is copyright infringement, and is illegal in most societies. If they catch you doing it, you could be fined or even put into jail. I hope you know what felonies you're committing by putting music codes on your webpage!

Overall Score: 67/80. That's an 83%. Congratulations! You've improved almost 30% from your last grade. Great job!
Back to Top

Zoloia's Flashing Blinkies {ReReview}


Reviewed on Feb. 22, 2009
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 7/10. There's a really big white space between the main title & the first two headers. Is that supposed to be like that? And, if this is a blinkie site, why not create a blinkie that says "Zoloia's Flashing Blinkies" for your main title? That would make the page a little more unique. There's also not much of a welcome message; I don't really feel welcome to the site. Why not give a little more of a welcome message?

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. Uh-oh! There's a grammatical mistake on your page.

-"If you want to be link exchanges with me, neomail me here."

That is a sentence with problems. It just reads weird. Here's what it should be: "If you want to exchange links with me, neomail me here." The way that you have it written is rather awkward.

Neatness: 2/10. *shakes head* Oh dear. Your link-back buttons are way at the bottom of the page, they should be at the top of the page. The link-back buttons could also be in a scrolling box, considering that there are so many of them. Some of the buttons in your "Affiliates" & "Listed At" sections are different sizes. Use the {img src="directlinkhere" width="88" height="31"} to resize all the different-sized link buttons to the same size. A good regulation size is 88x31. Also, your awards are just slammed willy-nilly into your Awards box. Your awards should be spaced out {put a (br)(br) between each award}.

Colors: 7/10. The background is really weird; it doesn't seem to match very well. Try using a green background that matches the color of your headers or a plain white background. The polka dots are a bit weird.

Music: 10/10. Having music on a petpage is not good. You receive an A in this category for keeping your page music-free.

Age of Site: 7/10. You have a counter, and it's got a pretty good number of hits considering it's been up for just over a month. HOWEVER, there is no date saying when your site was opened to the public! That's not good! When did your site open?

Quality: 2/10. Most of your blinkies have incredibly pixelly images on them. That's not good at all. Blinkie images should be clear & easy-to-see. There are some blinkies that I can hardly tell what they are depicting! Also, putting your name in HUGE letters on the blinkie isn't very good. You should put your name in a thin font at the bottom of the blinkie, so it's not the most prominent thing on the blinkie!

Updated List: 8/10. You seem to update at least every other day, but you should try to update every day. Try making a bunch of premade blinkies; just because you're a custom blinkie site doesn't mean that you can't have some premades ready for people to use!

Other Problems: You have a lot, actually. The problems are mostly quality & neatness problems. Since I don't have enough time to list them all, and since you just read through my review, you should know what they are. Be sure to fix them, and you'll have a pretty good site!

Overall Score: 51/80. That's a 63%. You've improved from your last score, albeit just a little. Just keep trying & fix the problems I've spotted, & you'll do fine!
Back to Top

Ace


Reviewed on Feb. 20, 2009
Reviewed in Safari
First Glance: 8/10. Once your layout ends, you don't have a background color that really matches your layout! It's a grayish-black while your layout's a brownish-gray. If I were you, I'd eyedrop your layout's background & replace your grayish-black background with the brownish-gray one. Otherwise, everything else looks nice & neat; great job!

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. Uh, oh! I spot a grammatical & spelling-error riddled sentence - the only one on the entire page!
The Sentence {underlined words are what you need to fix}:
So every petpage are compatible with all browers: IE, Firefox, Opra, Flock, and Safari. HOORAY! I'm not sure about the other browsers, I don't see to have them :(
{The are in the first sentence should be changed to "is", because if you use the singular of a noun, you must put "is" instead of "are".}
{The word browsers in the first sentence is missing; I added it in because it didn't make any sense without it}
{The word Opra in the first sentence is misspelled; it should be spelled as "Opera"}
{The . after the listing of browsers is needed because you go straight into the "hooray" without stopping to end your last sentence!}
{The word see should be "seem"!}

Neatness: 9/10. Your site is neatly laid out. The only thing that you could possibly add is "back to top" links after each section - it gets a little boring using the nav. links to get to one section, then scrolling all the way to the next section {whether it be up or down}. You could add "Back to Top" links at the bottom of each section to go back to the navigation bar. That might make it a little easier to navigate!

Colors: 8/10. Instead of typing all this again, let me copy & paste: "Once your layout ends, you don't have a background color that really matches your layout! It's a grayish-black while your layout's a brownish-gray. If I were you, I'd eyedrop your layout's background & replace your grayish-black background with the brownish-gray one. Otherwise, everything else looks nice & neat; great job!"

Music: 10/10. Wooooo! No music! That's absolutely fantastic!

Age of Site: 7/10. You could possibly add a counter & update more frequently. You have a good number of graphics for only two weeks being open.

Quality: 10/10. Fantastic! Everything looks great - there's no ugly blue borders around anything, either! Your blank blends are pretty cool, as are the "soft" banners. The "blank banners", on the other hand, could possibly be a little jazzier. But everything else is great, I didn't take off any points! Keep going!

Updated List: 8/10. You could possibly update more frequently than you do - updates are what keeps your site running. It's been seven days since you last updated - you should try to at least update every other day.

Other Problems: Nothing, really. Just add a counter & try to update more frequently!

Overall Score: 68/80. That's an 85%! Congratulations! Keep working on your site - you have a lot of potential, and your graphics are amazing! Keep going!
Back to Top

The Faerie Fountain


Reviewed on Feb. 4, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. It's a really neat layout, although the "Cursor by SunnyNeo" button in the top left-hand corner really takes away from the layout. I suggest moving the cursor code to the bottom of the page {underneath your link-back buttons} so you will still have the cursor, but you won't have the button at the top of the page.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything - great job.

Neatness: 9/10. Your arrangement of pets is really nice, but you could probably {like I said in a previous section} move the "Cursor by SunnyNeo" button to another area of your site, so it's not in the corner & distracting from your layout.

Colors: 10/10. It's quite nice - everything matches {even the scrollbars; it's really good to have colored scrollbars if your site is being viewed in Internet Explorer. Great job!

Music: 10/10. Fantastic. Music on petpages {in my opinion} is quite annoying.

Age of Site: 8/10. You have a good number of pets & hits, but most of your updates seem to be missing! There's a whole month of updates that dissapeared - I wonder what happened to them?

Quality: I don't think I can grade quality on this pet directory, so I'll just have to skip this section and make your score out of seventy instead of out of eighty.

Updated List: 6/10. You're missing about a month of updates! What happened to them? If you delete your updates, that's a really, really bad thing to do! Updates tell people what you've been doing with your site, so if you delete them, how will we, your visitors, know what you've been doing to the site? Also, you could probably make the updates box a bit bigger than it is - it's incredibly tiny at the moment.

Other Problems: Really, just the SunnyNeo cursor button & the missing updates. Otherwise, fantastic site.

Overall Score: 62/70. That's an 88%. Congratulations! Keep working on your site {and remember not to delete the updates!}.
Back to Top

Cotton Candy Premades


Reviewed on Feb. 2, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. It's quite - pink. But pink is cool - just in small amounts. Personally, I prefer black, but that's my opinion. Anyways, it's quite nice - although you might want to move the right side column over a bit so the page looks a bit more symmetrical.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I couldn't find anything wrong with your spelling or grammar, which made the grammatical nerd inside of me a little sad - the nerdy side of me enjoys pointing out other peoples' mistakes! *hah* But anyways, great job on the spelling.

Neatness: 10/10. It's a neat layout - and I mean that as in cute-neat and organization-neat. It also has a section for news, reviews, and link-back button. If you add any more to your page, you may have to put some "Back to Top" links in there after each section! Other than that, I think you're pretty good on the neatness section!

Colors: 9/10. It's a lot of pink, but for a site called "Cotton Candy Premades", because when I think cotton candy, I think pink. However, when doing premades for your page, you should also consider creating different colors for your premades. Have you ever seen Kitty's Premades? She does several different colors for her layouts, instead of just leaving her visitors to fend for themselves. That's something you might want to think about!

Music: 10/10. Great job! Music on a premades site would not only be distracting, but it would also be annoying {there is a difference between "annoying" & "distracting"}. Perfect~!

Age of Site: 7/10. I can't judge you perfectly on this, considering that you've only been open for two days, but I can try to tell you my views on your site {which is what you signed up for}. First of all, you should probably get a counter. Counters track the number of hits you get, which is a great way to tell visitors how many people have visited the site before them. Also, you should probably take the time to add different colors into your premades section. That will make people more likely to take the premades {most people are notoriously lazy; they want everything done for them!} if there are a plenthora of colors for each section {3-4 is a good number}. You just have to change the hex codes! You could even challenge people to come up with their own color combinations and "donate" them to your site! Think of the possiblities! But otherwise, you've got 2 styles in 2 days, & you've updated every day. Fantastic!

Quality: 9/10. The two styles seem to be really amazing, but you could probably move the "neopets navigation" to below the "site navigation". The site navigation is most important on your site, while the Neopets navigation can go below that. Also, with your current pink-y layout, the right sidebar is a little too far to the right. Try to make your petpages symmetrical if you are going to be doing a three-column layout!

Updated List: 8/10. I have to give you semi-full credit because you missed a few days of updating. When you have a site {especially a brand-new site!}, you should work on it at least once a day, possibly more, & record your updates in your updates section. That's the only way the site can continue! Just remember - updates are the appendix of the site! They may look worthless, but if a pain were to suddenly attack it{like a review, perhaps?}, you could die! Well, maybe not die, but it could hurt your reviews pretty bad!

Other Problems: Really, you just have to add a counter & add some different colors to your premades, and you'll be good to go!

Overall Score: 72/80. That's an even 90%! Not bad for your first review :D Just keep working on your site - I know you'll have a good one!
Back to Top

Lauren's 100k a Day


Reviewed on Feb. 2, 2009
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. It seems to be pretty awesome, but I found one contradictory thing - you say that the page works best in the Internet Explorer browser, because the right column's in a giant marquee in FireFox & Safari, but the right column's a marquee in Internet Explorer as well! Was this intentional?

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I saw a few mistakes. Sometimes you would put a punctuation mark after another punctuation mark - that's not good!
Example:
-"You discovered 300 neopoints! Click here to recieve.".
See? There's an extra punctuation mark that you don't need. Make sure you don't add extra punctuation marks!

Neatness: 9/10. You should probably add some "Back to Top" links after each section. That will make it easy for people to get back to the top of your guide instead of scroll up & down all the time. It would help a lot, I'm pretty sure ^.^

Colors: 10/10. It's very nice. The colors match pretty well - the blue & pink is a great combination, although you probably could have used a different color for the Lunar Temple Guide picture - maybe made it a shade of pink or blue instead of purple.

Music: 10/10. No music~! That's absolutely fantastic!!

Age of Site: 7/10. Your site seems to have been up for a little while, considering the number of links, but there are a few problems. You don't have a counter {you can get good ones from boingdragon; if you don't know that is, use a search engine} & you don't have that many updates. A counter is a very good thing to have - it tells your visitors how many people have visited your site before & the number of hits usually corrosponds to how long you've had the counter up {as long as you make sure to put "Counter started on -- --- ----" somewhere on the page}. The updates are most important {see: updated list section for more information on this}; they tell people what's been going on at your site!

Quality: 9/10. The only thing that I really see wrong is that the main header banner {the one with all the picture-panels on it} is a little blurry. That is because it is saved as a .jpg. Images should always be saved as .pngs, which is better quality than .jpg, and will get rid of all the blurriness. But otherwise, the site is quite nice ^.^

Updated List: 2/10. Not only do you have it in a marquee {marquees are NOT good for updates!}, but you only have six of them. You've been open for a year, and yet you only have six updates?! That's not right~! Also, your updates are really weird - they go from old updates to new updates - new updates should always be on top. That way, people don't have to scroll through old updates to get to the new ones. Make sure to update at least once a week {even if it's just deleting dead links & such}. How else will your visitors know what has been happening on your site?

Other Problems: The only things that I could find are the counter problem & the updates section. Putting your updates in marquees is never really that good. It makes it hard for people to read the updates. Try putting them into a scrolling box instead.

Overall Score: 65/80. That's an 81%! Congratulations! Not too shabby for your first review! Just fix a few things, & you're well on your way to an even-more fabulous site!
Back to Top

Microsoft Paint Guide


Reviewed on Jan. 26, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 10/10. It seems to be rather well-organized. The first thing I see is a navigation table. That's really nice - most people don't even have navigation! The main picture's really neat as well - if you made that in Microsoft Paint, I'd really want to learn how you do these things! MS Paint is a standard program on all PCs, and most people can't do much more than a badly scribbled drawing on it. I want to learn more...

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything, although I might have gotten a little carried away while reading. I read through everything and was in the process of opening MS Paint before I realized I still had a review to finish! Along with, of course, the Creative Writing project I've been putting off and the other graphic requests that I have to finish...If your guide is good enough to make me forget about all the millions of the things that I have to do just when I'm reading through it for spelling errors, I think that you're doing a good job.

Neatness: 9/10. Everything's well laid out & you've got yourself a fantastic navigation section...but you're missing something very important! What could that be...? "Back to Top" links! Nobody wants to scroll back & forth, up & down, all the time just in order to see one thing! Be sure to add some "Back to Top?" links in there somewhere - those are as important as the navigation!

Colors: 10/10. Gray & white is a nice color scheme - it matches everything, and it's simple. For a tutorial, nothing's better than something simple. Great job.

Music: 10/10. Music on a MS Paint tutorial would make absolutely no sense, so good job keeping the page music-free!

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a good number of affiliates, visitor hits, and a good amount of content. Good. Most people think that affiliates and hits don't matter, but they do - affiliates are your friends. They are there to help you.

Quality: 10/10. Wow. I am shocked. I never thought that MS Paint was good for anything other than the random scribbling that I do on my screenies. But after looking at this guide - I'm amazed. I think I'll have to put a little more thought into my screenies....and figure out what I can do with such a good guide at my disposal!

Updated List: 0/10. Ooooh no. You have a total of zero updates. That's absolutely NOT good at all! Updates tell people what you've changed, what you've added, & what you've taken away from your site. Not only does it help you get better grades on your reviews, but it allows you to keep track of your site. Try adding an updates section. It might help a little.

Other Problems: Really, the only things that I saw were the missing-in-action update list, and the "Back to Top?" links that probably need to be added. You should check into those ^.^

Overall Score: 69/80. That's an 86%. Congratulations! That's an awesome score, particularly for your first one from me! Keep working on your site - it's awesome, and you've most likely helped a lot of people. I really like it!
Back to Top

Creating A Petpage


Reviewed on Jan. 25, 2008
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 9/10. It looks like an amazing, well-organized site...but there's one thing that is bothering me: The main column of your site is seperated into seperate "tables", I guess you would call them, while your side column just runs all the way together. Shouldn't you try to make them match? Other than that, amazing looking page. I can't wait to explore more.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. Lots of text X.X Wow. But I managed to read all of it. I didn't see any mistakes...but I could have missed something....*stares around evilly* You have a lot of text, as I said before. I'm going with my best judgement on this and am saying that you have no spelling mistakes...at least none that I could see....

Neatness: 10/10. Everything's in nice, neat little boxes, there's a navigation bar, there are "back to Top" links at the end of every section....Everything's perfect. A little too perfect....The squirrels are back! Aaaaack! {explanation: there is none for squirrel-rabies!}

Colors: 10/10. Very pretty blues. I like it - it's simple and neat. I should probably do something like that to a layout of mine. My directory is in dire need of an updated layout - or maybe I could do a layout like that for a page that I'm thinking of making....Hm. Interesting. But! As I was saying, great job on the colors. You know, your site is really starting to scare me....*shifty eyes*

Music: 10/10. Absolutely fantastical! {yes, I know there's no such word as fantastical, but I had to put that in there, you know!} Music on petpages is really annoying, not to mention that it's illegal if you got it from a music code site & was too lazy to code your own. But I'm not going to rant about music codes at the moment. I have other things to worry about - such as the rabid squirrels who are chasing me. Now that's a scary thought!

Age of Site: 10/10. Perfect combination of updates, visitor hits, and content. Now your site is really scaring me....Who are you people??!

Quality: 10/10. I can't grade you like I do a graphics site, but knowing that your CSS is amazingly-fantastically-awesome, I think I can safely say that you get a 10/10 in this category. Good job. And stay away from me!

Updated List: 10/10. Perfect number of updates - you really know your stuff! Although now your site has me more than freaked out - I'm petrefied. Sites aren't supposed to be this fantastic! My computer can't handle fantasticness of this magnitude!

Other Problems: The rabid squirrels are chasing me....and they're coming for me...please save me! Oh ~ about your site, it's awesome. Perfect. But you might consider putting everything into it's own little "table", like your intro paragraph is. That might make it a little neater. But overall, great job.

Overall Score: 79/80. About a 99% and-then-some. I can't get a perfect rating on my calculator. If I weren't so lazy, I'd make you an award. Maybe I will later, if I have the time. Right now, I have to work on a creative writing project, and take the time to spiff up my own petpages. And I know that I'll take advantage of you from now on :D You have amazing petpages - I'll have to get your opinion on a lot of my pages before I start messing around with them. Thanks~!
Back to Top

Bobo Banners Site


Reviewed on Jan. 19, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. It's a little plain - isn't this supposed to be a banner site? Why not create a big, amazing welcome banner that welcomes your visitors to the site? And while the layout is nice, it's a premade. There are a lot of sites out there that you can request custom petpage layouts from - why not try one of those?

Spelling/Grammar: 7/10. You know that there has to be a space between the end of a sentence and the beginning of the next one? All of your sentences look like this.They all start immediantly without a space.Punctuation means the end of a sentence.Then you put a space to signal the beginning of the next one! Don't forget to do that!

Neatness: 8/10. Since you have a very short page, you don't need any in-site navigation at the present. However, the banners are just thrown onto the page - there's no....how shall I say it? Organization on the page. There are puppy banners next to Neopets banners, and smiley face banners next to those. Try organizing them into sections - one section for Neopet banners, one for animal banners, and one for misc. banners. That will make the page a bit neater, I believe.

Colors: 7/10. "Bobo Banners Page"? Why is it all rainbow-y, then? I don't know who Bobo is, but judging by your link-back button, he's a monkey. Try getting a nice layout from someone - something that you can personalize with monkeys, if you like monkeys.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic. No music. Most of the time music on petpages annoys me, unless it's my favorite song {"When You're Evil" by Voltaire}. Your site doens't need any music - it might alienate people.

Age of Site: 4/10. You have one link-back button and four banners, yet you've been open for a week? That's interesting. Your banners seem to be easy to make, so why haven't you made more of them? Sometimes I sit down and make graphics for one to two hours, just graphic-making. And that's all I do for that day. Graphic-making. You should also have a few forms for people to fill out in order for them to relay their requests to you. An example of a "form" is what you filled out in order to request a review from me. That's my review form. Most graphic sites have forms that people can fill out in order to request graphics. That's a good thing to have.

Also, you should probably get a counter. Boingdragon {find it on a search engine} is a good place to get a counter. Try to find a counter.

Quality: 3/10. The banners are extremely pixelly. And a little blurry. It seems as if you use Microsoft Paint for your banners - make sure you save them as .png, NOT .jpg! That will get a little of the blurriness out. But NEVER try to resize a picture to fit onto a banner! That's really bad. Instead, resize the banner to fit the picture. It'll look a lot better. All of the banners don't necessarily have to be the same size. Also, all of the banners are carbon-copies of the others. Try mixing it up a bit! All of your banners don't have to look exactly the same! That's a bit boring, ya' know?

Might I suggest a free, easy-to-use graphics program? It's a lot better than MS Paint & did I mention it's free? It's called GIMP. {Use a search engine to look it up}. I use it for everything - I used it to make this layout, in fact. It's got a lot of cool effects. Most of my graphics were made with that. It's really easy to use, and it's pretty darn amazing, if I say so myself. It's also a long term investment. Read about it and you'll see it's pretty amazing ^.^

Updated List: 5/10. You've been up for about a week, so you say, but you only have two updates? There's something fishy there.....Plus, your updates are quite vague. "I just added some banners like the aisha banner and the smiley face one". That's unclear. Name the banners that you added, and describe what you've done to the site! There are a lot of ways to make your page your own, but you have to be willing to go the extra mile to do so.

Other Problems: The quality of the banners is really what needs the most attention. Also, try request some buttons from Button Request sites {there are a lot listed on this page, under "graphics"}. Most people like 88x31 px. buttons.

Overall Score: 52/80. That's a 65%. Actually, that's pretty good for a first review from me! You just have to put a lot of hard work into your site & I'm positive you'll rise to the top! It just takes a lot of practice. Graphic Sites are a long-term investment; you can't just slap stuff up there & hope for the best. You have to take the time & effort to make sure it's updated. Keep working on your site!
Back to Top

Lindsey's Icons


Reviewed on Jan. 16, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. It looks like a rather well-laid-out site. The main picture could be a little more...interesting, I suppose. But otherwise, I like it! The name isn't very original though...that's really the only problem I have with this site at the moment.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. There are a few common mistakes within the page....like forgetting an l in "actually" {you spelled it "actualy"} & other common stuff like that! Just be sure to go over your page completely before you publish it to the web - sometimes people aren't very forgiving of spelling mistakes like I am!

Neatness: 7/10. Your site is rather easy to get around, but you need some sort of navigation system around the site! Yes, you have a "Neopets Navigation" section, but you need some in-site navigation as well! And a "back to top" link after every section might help a little bit...but only after you've added the in-site navigation, of course!

Colors: 9/10. What up wid da rainbows, maaaan? You're killing meh vibe, duuuude. *shakes head* Er, sorry. The "inner hippie" inside of all of us just reared it's ugly head. Heh heh. But what is with the rainbows? Why not some of the stars like you have in your main image? I think that would look nice ^.^

Music: 0/10. AAAAUUUUUGGGGH! Why didn't you tell me the music was the Jonas Brothers??! *covers ears until my sister slams the volume off* Ah....Well, most of the people that I know absolutely loathe the Jonas Brothers, and music is normally quite distracting {not to mention annoying!} on graphic sites. I can't concentrate with music on sites, so I normally close out those sites the moment music starts blaring. That way I can ignore the site & the music....even if a site is really nice, if you have annoying music playing it's not going to be visited very often. Maybe brief visits {span of 0-2 seconds}, but probably not more often than that. Also, you should know that making music codes is illegal and is considered copyright infringement. I don't feel like giving the entire Music Code Rant at the moment, so look for a music site I've reviewed & read their review. I probably ranted about the illegal-ness of music code making for others somewhere in there....

Age of Site: 9/10. You don't have that many hits, but you seem to have a lot of icons & you update frequently. But considering that some of your icons are from Photobucket.....I can't give you the full ten points for this one, because you put no effort whatsoever into those icons.

Quality: 4/10. The things that you made ALL BY YOURSELF {not STOLEN from Photobucket or made with the help of a Cheap Graphics Program} are rather neat - I, for one, normally can't think of things to put onto icons. But....you have broken one of your own rules! Or haven't you noticed that? You have said, and I quote:
Please don't take my icons for your own graphic site, if you want to make a site, you should be able to make your own.
My, my. You have STOLEN stuff from Photobucket. You don't give any credit to the original creators of the stuff {you just say "Some from Photobucket", which isn't credit at all!}, and yet you LINK IT TO YOUR PAGE?! Linking stuff that ISN'T yours to your page is EXTREME stealing....which also makes you guilty of breaking your second rule:
All the icons link back to my site, please keep it that way! It'd be even cooler if you could put up my link!
You don't link the NON-YOUR icons to the site of the Original Creator, do you? No, you don't. Which means that you either need to do that ASAP {reguardless of their outside link or not, if you put them on there, you MUST CREDIT THEM} and/or STOP REDISTRIBUTING THEM WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL CREATOR'S PERMISSION! If they find it on there....well, I wouldn't want to be on the recieving end!

Updated List: 9/10. You keep it updated daily - nice. Keep up the good work!

Other Problems: The stolen Photobucket Icons are the biggest problem you have - you might want to get rid of those right away! Other than that....just add some In-Site Navigation & some Back to Top links, and I think you'll be good! Oh~! And you could possibly get rid of the music code....*shudders*

Overall Score: 56/80. That's a 70%. Not bad for your first review from me! Oh...and don't forget to add my button. I didn't see it up there while I was reviewing your site! You wouldn't want to be neomailed at one-week intervals until you put it up, would you? D: I don't like doing that...but it's something that I must do if I want to keep in buisness.
Back to Top

My Blinkie Site


Reviewed on Jan. 16, 2008
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
Note: In no way do I own this blinkie site; the name of the site is literally "My Blinkie Site".
First Glance: 3/10. The title isn't really all that eye-catching; it's pretty boring if you ask me. If I were a normal visitor, I'd close out the page and resume my normal Neopet-ing without a second glance. And then there's the layout: a premade background with a marquee that doesn't really have matching colors, no layout whatsoever....and the one blinkie that I can see doesn't look all that good....but sometimes first glances are decieving, and the only way to get the feel of a site is to actually dive into it and figure out what it's all about.

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. You tend to overuse a certain punctuation mark {!!!}, and you could probably reword your marquee a little better. "Put the button back on your lookup". You could say, "Please put the link-back button on your lookup". That would look a little better.

Neatness: 8/10. It's easy to get around your site, but you should probably have a "back to top" link after each section. Like after the "Custom Blinkies" section ends, you could put a "Back to Top" link. Also, instead of forcing your "clients", so to speak, to go to your pet's lookup to see the waiting list, why not just put the waiting list on your page? That would make a lot mor sense to me....

Colors: 5/10. It's really bland. The background's a premade background, and there's really no layout to speak of. The weird pink & blue marquee doesn't really match at all. There are THOUSANDS of premade petpage layouts out there - if your page looks professional, normally more people will come & you will get more buisness.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic job. Music on petpages REALLY annoys me to no end.

Age of Site: 4/10. You say you've been open for a month, but you have a shoddy amount of blinkies, and you have no counter. Just because people don't request a blinkie doesn't mean that you can't make more! I suggest B O I N G D R A G O N for counters. They have a fantastic selection of counters!

Quality: 2/10. I....I'm going to be honest here: They're not all that good. The blinking effects are pretty nice {I don't have the patience to do that on my graphics site}, but the image quality beside the blinkie is normally rather....awful. Pixelly pictures aren't really the best thing to display. Try to get the highest quality pictures you can, and if you have to use MS Paint at all {which it sort of looks like you use}, be sure to save them as .png before you transfer them to the animation program. They'll look a lot better {unless you got pixelly images to begin with}.

Updated List: 0/10. Not a single update, and yet you've been open for a month? Interesting. Make sure you update your site - even if it's a tiny thing like "changed font color on 12/31" or something like that.

Other Problems: You have no update list, the quality's not really all that great, and you really have no layout to speak of. You should probably move your waiting list to your main page as well, instead of forcing people to backtrack just to see it! And perhaps you could recruit a graphic-maker to make you an 88x31 button - that's normally the size button that people want.

Overall Score: 40/80. That's a 50%. Not bad for your first review! Just keep working on your site and applying for more reviews - and remember, only you can prevent forest fires!
Back to Top

Otaku Works


Reviewed on Jan. 13, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
Note: I had to review it in Internet Explorer because I got a new computer & this one doesn't have FireFox on it yet!

First Glance: 10/10. Wow - it looks absolutely incredible!! It really looks like a professional website. I have yet to see something that looks as nice & organized as this page - I can't wait to see what the rest of it looks like. You must have put a lot of work and thought into this page....I only wish I had your skills!

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I saw a few common mistakes {like using "your" instead of "you're"}, but overall it is spelling-and-grammatical-mistake-free!

Neatness: 10/10. Your site is well-organized and easy to get around. Rarely have I seen a site like this...but when I do, I absolutely go estatic. I might have jumped up & down, but that would have meant dropping my laptop on the floor! Hah!

Colors: 10/10. Once again, everything is perfect. The colors look fantastic. But you could go one step further with Internet Explorer & add some color to the scrollbars. It's little touches like that that make your site really WOW your "clients". It's starting to bum me out! I'm nowhere near your talent!

Music: 10/10. Another perfect score. Music on a petpage is a no-no {even though you can't hear it in FireFox}. It will annoy some customers, freak out others, and make others go insane {I'm the latter}. Great job on keeping your page music-free!

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a lot of content considering you've only been up for 13 days! The counter has a good number of hits for thirteen days...and everything looks fantastic. You don't cut corners!

Quality: 9/10. Everything looks fantastic....although your icons are a little plain. Try adding text to them {not that they're not already awesome - they're incredibly awesome!}

Updated List: 10/10. You update frequently & that's a good thing! Keep up the good work!

Other Problems: Not that I could see, really! The only things that I would suggest would be that you try to fix the few grammatical errors that you have, and maybe add some color to the scrollbars {for internet explorer}. Just because FireFox users can't see the colored scrollbars doesn't mean that adding them would hurt!

Overall Score: 78/80. That's a 98%! Congratulations! If I can figure out what happened to all of my files {I got a new computer} I will make your award. Great job on your site! Keep working on it!
Back to Top

Cristina's Music Codes


Reviewed on Dec. 29, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. Very cute. Although, the neon-blue headers don't really match the background....why not try eye-dropping the color of the birds, if you like blue? That'll make it work a little better.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I did not find anything.

Neatness: 10/10. You have everything organized alphabetically, and even give tips on how to get around your site. Good job making your site easy to get around.

Colors: 8/10. The background looks a little....out of place. Or maybe it's that bright-blue header! Try eye-dropping the color of a blue flower or a bluejay to use as the headers' color, instead of the neon-blue, and it'll look a lot better!

Music: 0/10. Agh! So annoying! But this is a music code site...and even though I absolutely loathe music codes on petpages....I'll put up with it for now....but the song is quite annoying. To me, at least. I don't like it.

Age of Site: 5/10. For only being open a month, you have A LOT of music codes already up, and a lot of hits! I suppose you advertise a lot - and considering that a lot of people ask for music code sites on the HC, that's not surprising. But your updates leave something to be desired....

Quality: 10/10. I can't exactly grade you like I would a graphics site, dailies site, or directory, so I'll have to say that everything works. I have nothing to go with, so I'll just say that everything works {because if it didn't, where would the site go?} and since everything's a full song, I'll give you the full 10/10 for this section.

Updated List: 1/10. One month, one update. You delete your updates "every mon.", which is very, very bad. Updates should ALWAYS be kept! ALWAYS! Updates are the life-blood of a site! Life-blood! If I took away YOUR life-blood, what would happen to you? You would shrivel and die, that's what. So what happens to a site without any updates? It'll eventually die. NEVER, EVER, EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER!!!! Never delete your updates!

Other Problems: I hope you know that redistributing music codes WITHOUT written permission from the original artist is copyright infringement. If you redistribute the music WITHOUT paying the original artist, you are technically stealing music and money from them, which is illegal. Music codes themselves are illegal if you get them from someone who is redistributing them. A music code made by YOU for YOUR OWN PERSONAL USE is not breaking the rules, because you bought the music & will be using it for YOUR ENJOYMENT. Buying the music JUST TO MAKE MUSIC CODES FOR OTHERS, however, is copyright infringement, and is illegal in most societies. If they catch you doing it, you could be fined or even put into jail. I hope you know what felonies you're committing by putting music codes on your webpage!

Overall Score: 44/80. That's a 55%. Not bad for your first review from me! The only thing that you really *can* fix is the updates - just because "they get a little messy" doesn't mean you can delete them! Keep working on your site, though ^.^
Back to Top

Pixelburgh, PA


Reviewed on Dec. 29, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. The first time I looked at this site, it didn't really interest me. It's got a lot of text at the top, and it has no pictures at the top. I closed out the site without looking around at all. But now I have to review it, so I took a good, long look. And my first impression's the same - boring, all text, and no pretty pictures at the top. Just a big header that claims I'm in Pixelburgh, Pennsylvania. If that's so, where are the pixels? Are they farther down the page...? Normally people take a quick look at the front page, and if you can't grab their attention within three seconds, they'll shut it out. The ginormous yellow font at the top caught my attention for a second or two, then I got bored & didn't really want to scroll down the page....

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I did not see anything out of the ordinary, although I did see that you enjoy using commas! Think before you use a comma - that's all I'll say.

Neatness: 9/10. Everything is easy to see and it is easy to get around the page. But might I offer a bit of advice? You could possibly try using a tutorial like this or this to code a slightly better layout. The layout you have now is simply a blank page with a blue background on it...and normally the layout is the first thing that people look at when they go to a site. An awesome layout normally equals more customers/visitors.

Colors: 9/10. It reminds me of a dark & starry night - was that what you were going for? The blue and the yellow work very nicely together, and tied in with the white....it looks great!

Music: 10/10. YAAAAAAAAY! I can't TELL you how annoying Music-On-Petpages is! That's why I nearly jump out of my seat every time I come across a page with no music! FANASTIC!

Age of Site: 9/10. You have a lot of pixels {well, the slorgs are bases & are reusable...} and get around 10 hits a day {if you've been open 22 days}, but you don't have that many updates! You have 6 updates, and you've been open for 22 days? Something's wrong! What happened to the rest of the updates? And don't say "I deleted them because I didn't have any space..."! That's what scrollboxes are for!

Quality: 10/10. Everything is so cute ^.^ The only thing that bothers me is that most of them are so TINY. But they're very well done:

You have a talent that I would never dream of having. Keep at it!

Updated List: 4/10. For nearly a month of being open to the public, you have a shoddy amount of updates! Updates are the life-blood of a site! How are we {the reviewers & clients} supposed to know when you added a new pixel, what stuff is new, and when you change a bit of the layout? Updating your site is the most important thing you can do. Trust me.

Other Problems: What's up with the foot counter? I didn't realize what in Neopia it was until I read through your updates. Why not pick something cute, like one of your fishy pixels or something? *shakes head & mumbles* A foot. */mumble*

Overall Score: 69/80. That's a 86%. Not bad for your first review from moi! Keep at it! Your pixels are very, very cute!
Back to Top

KandyKanes


Reviewed on Dec. 29, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. The banner is all stretched and pixelly, so at first it was a little hard to figure out what on Neopia I was looking at! But then I looked some more... The rest of your page looks to be well laid-out and organized.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I did not see anything. Great job. Although your site's name makes me cringe whenever I look at it. Most people think that substituting different letters that sound the same for the letter that's supposed to be in the word is "cute". I, on the other hand, do not think so. "Graphix", "Graphx", "Thnx", "Thanx", "Kandy", "Kanes", etc., all make me want to scream. If you can't take the time to type an extra letter or two, or substitute the CORRECT one, why write the word at all? It makes me wonder....

Neatness: 9/10. It's a well thought-out and organized page, but you seem to have had a little trouble counting your affiliates! You have way more than ten affiliates, Riah! Time to recount them! And you should probably resize that Gray Directory button to be 88x31, just like all the other affiliates'. Other than that, I think the page is really nice ^.^

Colors: 10/10. Christmas-y colors! Nothing less for a Christmas Pet Directory, eh? The background also matches perfectly - a picture of candy canes! Although, considering your site is KandyKanes, you might want to try to find a picture of a kandy kane...The scrollbar is a little *bright* though! Wow! It's like neon! But it matches really well.

Music: 10/10. PERFECT! I can't tell you how much music on petpages bothers me - almost as much as grammatical/spelling mistakes! No music! WOOOOO!

Age of Site: 9/10. Nine Days, Five Updates. Even if you just did minor changes to the layout, update the page. But you seem to have a lot of Christmas Pets listed after only nine days, so great job on that!

Quality: 8/10. The big banner at the top needs some serious work. I'm sorry, but as a graphics-maker, I've seen better. And of course, I've seen worse {because for everything, there's always a worse thing out there!}. You may want to either get the banner to NOT be so stretched and pixelly, or make a new banner entirely...because as of now, it's very shoddy. But everything else seems to be in good order!

Updated List: 8/10. You've been open for nine days, and you have five updates. That's understandable if you've been on vacation, but I don't think you added nearly 70 neopets in just five days, have you? Well, you possibly could have.... What about the changes to the layout? You just say "KandyKanes has recieved a slight update to the layout." What's the update, might I ask? You should always be descriptive in your updates section!

Other Problems: The banner needs the most work, I think. Other than that, everything looks great!

Overall Score: 71/80. That's a 88%. Not bad for your first review from me! You just have to fix a few things, and then your site will be perfect!


Back to Top

Sarah's Neopoint Guide


Reviewed on Dec. 29, 2008
Reviewed in FireFox
First Glance: 10/10. Wow - amazingly layout. Even the background matches perfectly, even if it's a slightly lighter shade of blue. I think it looks absolutely fantastic! I also like the way that it gradually de-pixelizes {in FireFox, at least} while the page/image loads. That's really neat.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I saw a few simple mistakes. In one section, you say "Without much effort at all", which is an awkward sentence. It would be better to say "Without much effort", "without any effort", or "with little effort". There are also a few places where you forgot to add the "s" to the end of the word "points". Points in plural! And I didn't take off for the fanmail - it's people's real words, and I've have to be a heartless reviewer to take off for that!

Neatness: 10/10. Everything's well-organized. You have back-to-top links after each section {which are really important!}, and a navigation bar at the top. Everything works fantastic. But I think you could probably center the counter as well! It's the only thing on the page that's not centered, for some reason...

Colors: 9/10. Like I said before, the colors match perfectly. But I still have a few suggestions - why not eyedrop a few colors off of your starry xweetok to use on your page? Like the links could be the color of her fur, etc. I think that would look neat! But it's your page, and it already looks fantastic, so if you're not sure, don't do it!

Music: 10/10. Perfect! I was afraid that I'd have to tie my Chia up again, because even if he's on another account, he can still hear music and will start foaming at the mouth. Great job on keeping your site music-free!

Age of Site: 8/10. You told me that your site's been up for around four months or so, and I winced when I saw the updates only started in October. Ack. But you have a decent amount of hits on your counter, and it looks as if you update frequently. I only wish that you started your updates when you started the site!

Quality: 9/10. Okay, I obviously can't grade you the same way I'd grade a graphics site, so I took a different direction. All of your images are clean and not blurry, and you have many of them. Your links all go to the correct place, and your ratios are updated. I think that deserves a good score!

Updated List: 7/10. And now we come to the biggest problem - the updates. I know you started updating in October, but why wait so late if your guide started earlier in the year? Hm? But at least you update frequently, which is why I didn't take off as many points as I could have. Just remember - updates are like the life-blood of the site!

Other Problems: Not that I could see. Really the only thing is the updates.

Overall Score: 72/80. That's a perfect 90%! Congratulations! You have an awesome site and are an awesome friend - a perfect combination. Keep going!


Back to Top

Graphics by Design


Reviewed on Dec. 22, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 7/10. What...the...heck? Dancing monkeys....GINORMOUS banners? What on earth is this? Oh, it's Graphics by Design. Took me a while to figure out where the title was. And are those supposed to be link-back buttons on the side? They're HUGE! Normally, link back buttons are 100x100, 100x50, 88x31, or 88x33 pixels. Not 500x500 or anything huge like that! How are we supposed to fit those things on our petpages?! And the monkeys make it look like a little kid's site. And the music - how I wish I had known that before! I don't think I've ever seen my cat move that fast! *snaps speakers off* That should be better.

Spelling/Grammar: 7/10. Lots of mistakes, not to mention that I had to highlight everything in order to read it. *shakes head* You should always make sure that your font color is READABLE!!

There aren't really much graphics or backgrounds,just cursors. {really bad sentence; could be rephrased as "There aren't that many graphics or backgrounds, just cursors."}

Most of the backgrounds are made by me,some,which I do not take credit for,although I did have to change them into backgrounds,came from google images or photobucket. {ALWAYS put spaces after ANY TYPE OF PUNCTUATION!! That's rule #1 in spelling}

NEW!I'm now adding graphics with animations. Some aren't mine and if you want them off my page please neomail me. {Add spaces after punctuation!}

All in all, you had too many incidents of not putting spaces after punctuation!!

Neatness: 2/10. Everything's just a big, jumbled mess. Your link-back buttons are huge, and beneath the link-back buttons, there are about a hundred or so "back to top" links, which make NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. Why are they on the side like that? And where's the in-site navigation? It's incredibly hard to get around. I keep having to scroll down and scroll up, back and forth, back and forth, just to see all of your graphics. The sidebar where you put the Link-Back Buttons is supposed to be used for the in-site navigation or the neopets' navigation. It might look okay if the Link-Back buttons were normal-sized, but since they are so huge, it just looks messy and distasteful. Not to mention that everything's out of order - there are cursors mixed in with backgrounds, etc. Even if you think it's *cute*, graphics sites are, at best, streamlined, easy-to-navigate, and enjoyable to look around.

Colors: 5/10. Incredibly awful. Your link-back buttons are huge and don't match your color scheme at all, the font is unreadable at best, and you enjoy sticking random monkeys wherever and whenever you can. *shakes head* That just makes a mess. Even if you think it's *cute* to do stuff like that....not many other people will think the same.

Music: 0/10. AGH! It's so incredibly annoying. The moment it started playing, I X'd out of the site. Then I realized, "Oh, heck. I have to review that site." So, I turned off my speakers and opened it again. GOOD RULE OF THUMB: Don't put any music on your site. There's a good chance that others are already listening to music, and they don't want to hear YOUR music clash with THEIRS. That's why I use FireFox - I don't hear any of the music people haphazardly slap onto their site!!

Age of Site: 5/10 Judging by your counter, you've been open since September. Why, then, do you only have three or so updates? You have way more than three graphics/cursors/backgrounds. Also, why is everything still a jumbled mess? You can't just slap things up there and hope for the best - you have to go back every once in a while and delete dead links, make sure all your graphics still look good, and organize things. That's a really good sign that the site is active. Your site, on the other hand, looks like you've done nothing to it since the day you opened it.

Quality: 6/10. Your cursors are pretty good. Your graphics, on the other hand....*sighs* I've seen better. And I've seen people who actually MAKE their backgrounds. You say flat out that you "Most of the backgrounds are made by me,some,which I do not take credit for,although I did have to change them into backgrounds,came from google images or photobucket". That's a really bad image, right there! NEVER take things that aren't yours!! NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER!! Even if *other people* do it, set the better example and DON'T! That, my reviewee, is copyright infringement, and is frowned upon in most societies.

Also, I seriously doubt you made this:
, because I've seen it in several other layouts that I'm positive that YOU didn't make. NEVER put things on your graphics site that you did not make!! That's stealing!


Hm. Random pictures of...cats?...slapped onto one canvas. No, no, no. Sloppy. Try blending them together!

And what's with using a cheap-o online program to do glitters and stuff? That will get you no respect in the graphic-making world. Either get a proper program to do it, or quit making them. No respect...that's what I used to get when I used Lunapic to make my graphics. No longer for me! I got a great, free program {GIMP}, and began my quest to conquer it. That's what I made this layout in!

Updated List: 2/10. You have a grand total of three updates. Yet, you've been open since September??! That makes no sense. Every single time you add another graphic/cursor/background {one that you made YOURSELF, not one that you stole off photobucket/google!} to your page, you should add that to the "updates" section, saying what you did to the page and when you did it. Otherwise, how are we supposed to know that you didn't abandon the site a few days after you put it up? We don't.

Other Problems: Basically, everything. Get rid of the music code {that is extremely annoying to lots of people; ask around on the Help Board}, make your link-back "buttons" smaller {88x31 px. is the regulation size for most pages}, organize your page, update your page often {putting the updates IN the "updates" section!}....and....I can't remember what else I mentioned, but you just read the review, so you should know.

Overall Score: 34/80. That's a 42%. I'm not going to lie - you have a lot of work to do on your page. A graphics site is something that takes time and effort. I work on my site at least 2-3 hours a day, and keep it updated. Most other graphic sites do the same. Use some of the suggestions I gave you in this review to help you make your site better. {And you should also probably try to make it compatiable with FireFox, because as-of-now...it's really bad}.
Back to Top

Superfly CSS


Reviewed on Dec. 19, 2008
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 9/10. It looks really nice. I, to put it bluntly, can barely code a single div box into a picture *waves hand at Siren's Song layout*, but you look like you've put a lot of time, effort, and such into making your first impression the right impression. I, for one, am impressed. But it does look a bit...bland. I don't know how else to put it. Perhaps I'm a bit too sleepy from eating nothing but sugary-sweetness all day? {last day of school, natch}

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I must give you credit for talking Canadian, eh? It looks as if you know what you're doing, eh? But I believe "petuserlookups" can be spaced out to look like "pet lookups" or "pet userlookups". I have yet to hear someone call a pet look a "petuserlookup". Because, since pets are not users, they don't need a userlookup, they just need a pet lookup. See my logic, eh?

Neatness: 10/10. Everything is nice, neat, and easy to find. And I absolutely adore the awesome CSS-trick-thing for the navigation buttons, even though the nav. buttons are practically useless on such a page! But what made me extra happy was that you dedicated so many blank petpages to your petpage collection! How on earth were you able to find that many petpages? Seventy-Five petpages...and less than twenty of those are yours, because {four pets} times {five accounts} equals {twenty petpages}. I'm guessing you either have A LOT of siblings, or you have many volunteers. Or forced volunteers.

Colors: 10/10. It's quite nice...although the background color {of your main layout} looked a bit awkward at first. Is it gray? Or is it a light-ish purple? I have yet to figure it out. And that, my friend, is going to drive me ABSOLUTELY NUTS!

Music: 10/10. Perfect...no music. Not that I'd be able to hear it, anyways, over the sound of my printer printing off the sheets of printed paper that I wanted printed off. Sheet music, you understand. I MUST continue my piano lessons on my own, for all the teachers around here are too stingy.....

Age of Site: 9/10. You have an ABSOULTELY AMAZING NUMBER OF PETPAGES. But you might want to work on the pet lookups - everything else outnumbers them more than 2 to 1! Ahhh...you say you've been open for a year and a half, but you ONLY have 5000 hits? That's outrageous! My graphics site, which has been open since June, has gotten over 7000 hits, and it's absolutely no where NEAR the stuff that your site has! Come to think of it, there's no indication on your site when you started the site, or when you started the counter. At least, I'm assuming that number's the counter - the one right underneath the updates? And that's another thing - I hope to high heaven that you don't delete your updates! That would be absolutely catastrophic for your score! Gah! If content is considered the heart of a petpage, then the updates must be the appendix. It may look unimportant, and it may do absolutely nothing but list a random list of dates and stuff that you did, but without it, you could die. I think that's right. I'm a little loopy today!

Quality: 10/10. Everything is absolutely amazing. If only I possessed your skill and patience with coding! But alas, the best thing I can do is this, and even then it only works in FireFox {the nav. links} and it's very simple! If only...if only...if only....BUT! Your stuff is amazing. I see more of your work than I see of Simone's, but Kitty's CSS comes in a close second after yours!

Updated List: 6/10. You've been open for a year and a half, right? So why did you only start updating in October? That's not right. If you deleted those updates...that'd be the worst thing ever. That's what scrollboxes are for!! If the updates list gets too long to hold in next to your affiliates list, simply tack a scrollbox onto the thing and let it scroll! Oh - and always put the NEWEST updates near the TOP.

Other Problems: There weren't that many problems with your site. The main one, of course, is the appendix-bursting-updates-section. Keep your updates! Oh, and add the dates that you started the site, and the date that you started the counter *stabs counter-thing* If that is indeed a counter. Otherwise, fantastical job, eh!

Overall Score: 73/80. That's a 91%! Congratulations on getting such a high score the first time I review you, eh?! Fantastical, I might add! Normally it takes about two scores to get into the "A" category - unless a site is as amazing as yours! Amazingly awesome job, Rach! *bows deeply* I am amazed at your skill. Keep it up!


Back to Top

Popsicle Premades


Reviewed on Dec. 14, 2008
Reviewed in Mozilla FireFox
First Glance: 7/10. Interesting. A simple picture of a kiko, with a green bubbly background and blue navigation links? The blue navigation links don't match at all. If your background was blue, I'd understand the navigation colors, but since it's green, the navigation should be green as well. And there's no "This page looks better in ---- browser" anywhere. I almost opened it up in Internet Explorer, and it looked so awful that I had to re-read your application to see that it looked better in FireFox. You should probably put a warning message on there, and make a better welcome message, other than "See examples at my userlookup and ---'s userlookup!". You should probably make those link to the lookups as well.

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. I spotted a few mistakes. Like, in your welcome message:

Welcome guest, this is a site that I constructed myself.
The mistakes are in italics. It should probably be reworded as such: "Welcome, guest, to Popsicle Premades, a site that I constructed myself." Your current "welcome" message {if it can be called that....} is rather confusing.

Also, that "Italian dessert that I can't remember what it's called but it's REALLY yummy" is weird. If you can't remember what it's called, what's stopping you from Google-ing it? As a matter of fact, I know that it is called Eis. I absolutely love Eis. Italian Eis is fantastic. There used to be an Ice-Cream Man who came around my neighborhood who sold Italian Eis.

Neatness: 9/10. It's...rather neat in some ways, but having all of those "Random Facts" and "About Me" stuffed into the sidebar isn't neat at all. I would suggest that you add another page for your "About Me" and the Random Facts could be deleted if you wish! Of course, you'll need to update your FAQ to corrospond with the name-change of your site! Also, if you wanted to, you could even take out the Neopets navigation! That would clear things up a lot.

Colors: 7/10. The navigation links, to be honest, look absolutely terrible because of your green-layered layout. The navigation links are a dark navy blue {or are they black? 0.o}, while your background is a multitude of greens. I suggest changing your navigation links' color to something that actually matches. Like green.

Music: 10/10. Fantastic. I can't tell you how many times I've gone to a webpage and had to close it out because of whiny pop stars and awful boy bands. Congrats on keeping your site music-free.

Age of Site: 9/10. It took me a while to find the counter, actually! You might could put the counter right below or above the "links" section. That would make it easier to see.

Quality: 3/10. I looked at all of your lookups, and I have to say, while some of them were fantastic, others were absolutely horrendous. The "Avatar Fanatic" lookup looks awful. You can do much better than that, judging by your "Bori Love" lookup. That one is fantastic. Your "Happy Holidays" lookup blinded me {you can do MUCH better with that one; the colors are crazy}, and the picture on the "Rolling JubJubs" lookup is weird and awkward, not to mention that it doesn't match the background colors at all!! The "Fire Kougra" lookup is also in the category of the "Happy Holidays" one - it needs some serious color overhaul. It blinded me. All in all, out of the seven lookups you have on there, only three of them are presentable: The Snoopy Lookup, the Bori Love Lookup, and the Snowbunny Lookup. The others are absolutely awful.

About the pet lookups....only one was so blinding that I screamed. Your "Garin the Pirate" lookup has an extremely blinding background. You might want to fix that. Other than that one lookup, there were all fantastic, the Faerie Xweetok one in particular.

With your petpages, only 1/3 of them are presentable. Your Blue & Green Hearts petpage looks amazing. It's perfectly in line. However, with your snowbunny one and your maraqua one...the text is out of the div boxes on both of them. You might want to look into that.

I couldn't check out your shop descriptions, but I'm hoping that they don't fall prey to hideous backgrounds and blinding colors, like so many of your other layouts have.

Your backgrounds and glitters are very good, though. Good job.

Updated List: 10/10. It seems as if you update often and are very thorough. Great job.

Other Problems: The awful eye-burning layouts! Seriously, what were you thinking when you put those neon colors and stripes together? Sometimes you have to think other peoples' reactions to the bright colors!! Um...and you can get rid of the Neopets' navigation links if you so wish, and putting the counter above the "Links" section might work better. You could also possibly get an "About Me" page, so that stuff can be deleted off the sidebar. And adding the FAQ to your "Contact Me" page might help a lot!

Overall Score: 63/80. That's a 77%. Keep working on your site, and fix the blinding lookups! You'll only get better with time ^.^
Back to Top

Anime Ike ReReview


Reviewed on Dec. 8, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. Oh, that annoying Neopets box! If you could only move that to the bottom of the page...{and get rid of that yellow bar at the top!}...you would have an awesome, eye-popping layout! But alas, The Neopets Team doesn't like us moving the boxes where we want them to go, now do they?

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I found one small mistake, but I didn't want to seem cruel by taking away an entire point for one small mistake! In Light's newest blog entry, she spelled "inactive" as "unactive"....a really common mistake, but a mistake nonetheless! Just fix it!

Neatness: 9/10. You should probably have some "back to top" links in there somewhere - that way I don't have to scroll all the way back up when I want to get to the top of the page!!

Colors: 10/10. Everything fits together nicely with your layout - even the Neopets "annoying box" has been color coded! If I gave out bonus points, you'd get some for that!

Music: 10/10. It's really...actually nice. I'm glad I wasn't listening to my stuff at the time - I really like your music. But, alas, some people find music annoying on petpages, but yours is soft, doesn't include overrated Disney Celebs, or has lyrics...so I think you're okay. For now. *cackles evilly*

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a good amount of updates, hits, and graphics for the three months that you've been up! I congratulate you on that, Lillian and Light!

Quality: 10/10. Every time I see your site, it simply takes my breath away. Oh, how I wish I could do icons as well as you two do! Cases in point:
Ouran High School Death Note Naruto
Simply amazing.

Updated List: 7/10. It looks as if you update frequently. That's a very good habit to have. But you are missing a few weeks sometimes....try not to skip any weeks. That would be bad if someone that is a harsher grader than I were to come along....you'd probably get ZAPPED!

Other Problems: Um. Try to update more often....and perhaps fix the small spelling mistake you made, Light? Gah! I can't really think of anything else....*falls on desk* Oh! *shakes aching head* You may want to consider adding some more anime/manga series on there....*off the top of my head* FullMetal Alchemist, Vampire Knight, Inuyasha...just for example. I'm not saying you should add those in particular...but I've never heard of "Howl's Moving Castle"...Maybe I'm weird... X.x

Overall Score: 74/80. That's a 93%! Great job! You've raised your score five points in just a few months - that's great. Keep working on your site! I check in ever so often...simply because I'm curious. And I love what I'm seeing!
Back to Top

Ready Set Graphics


Reviewed on Dec. 8, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. Wow - it looks all nice, neat, and professional! All I have to say is that you could use a picture or two to spice up the front page - if I were a first-time visitor to this site, save for the title, I wouldn't know it was a graphics site at all!

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. You do use some chatspeak terms! Le Gasp! Such as "kthx", and "Ya". I realize that the last one may be a hot topic, such as "Is it chatspeak, or is it not?", but I believe that if you can't take the time to type two more letters, why type the word at all? And "kthx"...there is simply no way in the proper english language that this term can be pronounced! Leave off the chatspeak, Kendra! We'll be waiting!!!

Neatness: 9/10. There's one little glitchy part...if you click on the "Site Stats" tab...the entire little box thing moves SOUTH!! Is that supposed to happen??! Is it??!! TELL ME!!!! *takes deep breath* Okay, I'm better now. Now....you should fix this as soon as humanly possible! Oh, and you might want to get rid of the borders by your navigation links! A quick border=0 at the end of the img code will get rid of that! But you probably already knew that, didn't you?

Colors: 10/10. Nice color scheme. A gray-on-gray monochromatic. I like it. Gray is my color {actually, black's my color, but gray is what you get when I'm happy, plus gray's the color of rainy days, my favorite weather!}

Music: 10/10. SWEET! No music! That's fantastical! {yes, I know fantastical's not a word, but neither is "spazinator", yet this guy in my class says that all the time!}

Age of Site: 7/10. Amazing layout...and you updated before the site even opened??! That's fantastical {that word again!}!!! Ah, but you might want to add a counter to the first page {the home page}! That would make everything better, don't you think?

Quality: 10/10. Everything's very simple, nice, and neat. The simple lookups especially. But you might want to put the lookups on YOUR lookup, screenshot it, upload the screenshots, the put them above the text area {resizing them to about 50x50 px}, so people can drag-and-drop to see the actual product before they actually get it!

Updated List: 8/10. You have two updates, but you've only been open a week, so that's understandable {well, three updates if you count the one you made before your site was opened!}. Just keep working on those updates!

Other Problems: You should probably get a counter, make previews for your work, and fix the glitchy "Lookup" tab. Oh, and don't forget to remove the borders from your navigation links!!

Overall Score: 71/80. That's a 89%!! Amazing! And your petpage layout {for the entire site} is absolutely stunning; mine, on the other hand, needs some extreme work in order for it to work in Internet Explorer!! Great job on your score though - fantastic!
Back to Top

Curious Girl Designs


Reviewed on Dec. 8, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 9/10. Wow - that's quite....pink. Very pink. And blue. Wow. But I think I would have put the navigation bar on the right side...it looks a little awkward-ish on the left. Or maybe aligned all the text on the navigation bar to the right, since your title headers are also aligned to the right.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I did not see anything.

Neatness: 7/10. There are a lot of things that you could have done differently. Normally, when I see things aligned to the right {your headers, for example}, most of the text is aligned to the right as well, but yours is centered, and it looks a little out-of-place. The text on the navigation sidebar, especially. Stuff like this bugs me immensely...I think I may have a little bit of CDO {that's Obsessive-Compulsive-Disorder in alphabetical order!}

Colors: 10/10. Well, I have to say that they all match....and they all seem very...bright. But personally, I absolutely loathe pink in any and all form. *shivers* But just because I loathe it doesn't mean it doesn't look good paired to the blue...*shivers*

Music: 10/10. Yaaaaaay! *jumps up and down while dancing* You don't have any music! YES! It ticks me off to no end when people apply their own tastes to their site. Don't get me wrong - sometimes some sites need a little extra "oomph" to get their site going, but music codes are NOT the way to go!

Age of Site: 3/10. For the number of hits {I do accept that your counter has been up since yesterday, but it really should have been up before that!} and that your site has been up since AUGUST, you really should have more than two or three updates. Sorry, but you should try to update more. Although I do see that you absolutely love to talk...and that you enjoy explaining every detail.

Quality: 7/10. This is really iffy. On the one hand, I absolutely love your CSS. It's nice and simple, and you've even coded User Lookups to match some! But on the other hand....Everything is identical. All you change is some colors and the background. That's....extremely boring. You may want to experiment with different styles!

Updated List: 2/10. You have a grand total of two updates, yet you've been up since August??! What happened to your updates? Please don't tell me you deleted them - that would be a shame. The only thing preventing you from a near-perfect score is the updates that you deleted simply because you changed the name of your site!!

Other Problems: Your updates. That's a big no-no if you deleted them! Gah!!! And you might want to work on creating different styles of CSS - yours is simple and cute, but everything is boring and look-alike. Blech! And you try to do that "#-V-I-S-I-T-O-R" trick on your site, which doesn't work because you haven't entered it correctly. It says your username instead! Aaaaaaah! You might want to fix that - pronto.

Overall Score: 58/80. That's a 73%. Honestly, the only thing that kept you from an 85+ is your updates. If you deleted them simply because you changed your site's name and thought "Oh, I don't have to keep those anymore! They're from my 'other site'!", that's a big problem. You told me that you've been open since August, so where are the updates from August since? *hangs head* And I had such high hopes for this review....


Back to Top

Spellbound


Reviewed on Nov. 30, 2008
Reviewed in FireFox
First Glance: 10/10. Wow, everything looks nice and organized...and even though I can't keep my room straight, I love it when *other* people are organized!

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I spotted one thing:

Spellbound is a request site which makes petpages! {"which" should be replaced with "that". If you say "which", it sounds really awkward, whereas "that" makes the sentence less awkward. Was that understandable...? I'm not all that good at explaining things XD}

Neatness: 10/10. I could find everything easily, and all of your affiliates' buttons are 88x31, so you don't have a mess of different-sized buttons! You've even resized all of your awards to be the same size, and your navigation coding is really cute!

Colors: 10/10. Everything fits together really nicely. The bright green-ish color of the bold font sort of stunned me for a second, but then I got over it, and the more I look at your page, the more I think, "Hey, that's the perfect font color!" Great job!

Music: 10/10. If I weren't in FireFox, I wouldn't hear any music either! Keeping your petpages clear of music is what I really like. Sometimes I come across petpages with super-annoying songs by Hannah Montana, The Jonas Brothers, or even....Rap music! If I didn't have to review those sites, I would have closed out the petpage and never came back. Awesome job keeping your site free of annoying music! {music codes also slow down the loading time!}

Age of Site: 10/10. You have updated almost every day, you have a counter {albeit a hard-to-find counter! Maybe move it up above the "open/closed" section?}, and you have a LOT of custom-made petpages considering you've only been open for fifteen days or so! Amazing job!

Quality: 10/10. Absolutely amazing. I thought that Kitty's Premade Petpages were the absolute best out there, but after seeing yours....I think I'm at a dead-even tie between your CSS and Kitty's CSS! And if I'm not mistaken...are you writing on the petpages themselves? Because if you are...on the computer...I salute you. Everything I try to write on the computer turns out as an indecipherable mess!

Updated List: 10/10. Not only do you update frequently, but you explain everything in detail, including buttons and names of sites. I applaud you, Mel!

Other Problems: Just the counter, actually. I was going to rant about getting a counter, but then I realized, "Oh, wait. She has a counter. It's just below the affiliate count and such." You might consider moving the counter to either right below the Link-Back Buttons, or at the top of the "main" column right underneath "Best viewed in FireFox". And I can't really tell the difference between FireFox and Internet Explorer...so I'll just leave you with that!

Overall Score: 79/80. That's a 99%! Amazing! You're only the Fourth Person who's had a site awesome enough for me to give my 99%+ award to! *point below* Awesome job, Mel. Keep up the good work! Your site is absolutely amazing!


Back to Top

The Second Star to the Right


Reviewed on Nov. 29, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer


First Glance: 9/10. It looks really nice...but are those link-back buttons next to the banner? I can't..really....tell. Oh, wait. Of course they are. Huh. They have "Erin's Graphix" on them. Interesting. I thought this was "Second Star to the Right"?

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything....and believe me, I go over sites with a magnifying glass!

Neatness: 7/10. I found that it was very difficult to find your Link-Back Buttons! For one thing, they all say different things! "Erin's Graphix", "All Children Grow Up Except For Me", "Peter and Wendy", and a random icon. I didn't even know they were link-back buttons until I looked really closely. You should probably make some actual link-back buttons. You can get rid of the one that says "Erin's Graphix", because this is, obviously, not "Erin's Graphix", this is "The Second Star to the Right"....or is it? You've confused me!

Colors: 8/10. They sort-of match your main picture...but I think you should probably replace the neon-blue with a sort of greenish color...Like what Peter has on his...er..."outfit". I think that would look really nice!

Music: 8/10. I liked the music...I've never heard it before, but it's really nice. I might have to get it for my iPod now! *giggles* Ah, anyways, it matches your site, because you say that Peter Pan "has always made my imagination fly and hit the roof", and the music is about hitting the ceiling, so it sort of matches. But it gets quite annoying after a while. After three "revolutions", so to speak, I turned off my speakers.

Age of Site: 5/10. You say you've been open for about two months, and if so, you have a lot of hits on your counter for only two months! So that's really nice. But...you don't seem to have any updates! Your updates box is really all about you, and how you're looking for a co-owner. That's not what an updates box is for! Get some updates!

Quality: 7/10. Well, if you made all of your link-back buttons, they're really nice. As I can't judge your site like I normally do with graphics sites {because you're mostly music codes}, but let's start with your petpages first: They're really nice. They're well put-together, but once again, you've got "Erin's Graphix" as the Credit Button on there! What on earth is Erin's Graphix??! It's starting to bug me now!! Gaaaaah! *runs in circles screaming* Ah...Sorry about that. It's late, and I get loopy when it gets late. So, you've got music codes. That's a bit too bad....because, I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but you're breaking the law. Copyright Infringement, to be exact! You're redistributing the music to others for FREE {meaning, without paying the original recording artist ANYTHING} and they're putting it on their page. Now, if you had just made one music code for you {making music codes for yourself is perfectly legal, simply because you bought the music, and you're not redistributing it at all}, that would have been okay, and I wouldn't be ranting about Copyright Infringement at this moment! This is one thing that SERIOUSLY bugs me about Music Code Sites - I mean, if I had the power, every single site that redistributed music codes would be shut down, and their owners treated to a hefty fine. But...I'm starting to get bored with my rant, so let's move on.

Updated List: 0/10. I didn't see anything even remotely resembling updates. Updates are incredibly important! How else are your potiential "clients" supposed to know when you've updated things, or added new ones? That's important. How else are we reviewers supposed to know that you haven't just slapped the site up there?? Huh?

Other Problems: The Link-Back Button fiasco is the biggest thing right now. Get some proper link-back buttons! Ones that say the name of your site! Oh, and you might want to rethink "Music Codes"....Just saying.

Overall Score: 54/80. That's a 68%. Not bad! Just keep working on your site {particularly the annoyingly not-looking-like-link-back-buttons link-back buttons!} and you could very well have a Grade-A site! Great job!


Back to Top

Syd's Buttons


Reviewed on Nov. 29, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer


First Glance: 7/10. Ew. Edward Cullen. What does that have to do with button making? It's a pretty well-done blend...but the scrollbar colors don't match, and you should probably figure out a way to get rid of the yellow bar at the top. That totally messes up your layout. And you've changed your name from "Syd's Buttons" to "Link Back Buttons"?? Syd's Buttons sounds so much better. Link Back Buttons is bland, boring, and unoriginal.

Spelling/Grammar: 6/10. I found a few mistakes.

Sorry i haven't updated in awile hings have been slow... i have another site! {All of your "i"s should be capitalized, so they look like "I". Awhile has an "h" in it, and "things" is spelled with a "T". Make sure you fix this!}

This is not a rule but it may take awile to make a button for you sorry {Awile should be changed to AWHILE, and there should be an ending punctuation mark between the "u" of you, and the "s" of sorry. And sorry should be capitalized.}

FALLOW THEM! {Follow is spelled with an "o". There is no "a" in follow.}

Neatness: 7/10. I found it hard to get around your site. I think you need some sort of in-site navigation. There is also no link for us to neomail you the form. You should probably fix that!

Colors: 4/10. It's really a big mess. The neon-blue scrollbars and headers are way too bright for your main image...And you really need to get rid of the yellow bar at the top. It's really distracting!

Music: 5/10. It's a 50-50 tie. On the one hand, I really like the music. On the other hand, it's incredibly annoying while trying to look at the site. So, to be fair, I had to give you half credit here.

Age of Site: 3/10. You told me when you signed up that the site was only about two days old, and boy, does the site itself show it! You have two updates {and what's with all the stuff about having "another site" so you couldn't update? I have about five sites to maintain, and I find the time to properly update them all!}. Also, you need to get a counter. That's one of the things that you should get as SOON as you open the site. Otherwise, you'll keep putting it off.

Quality: 6/10. Some of the buttons are good, but you don't even have any EXAMPLES of your work! Examples should be the first thing that you put up on your site, so people can see what your site looks like. This button, for example:

Needs a lot of work. It's really a mess. You should always take the time to refine your work, and not just slap something up there and call it a button! Sometimes it takes me two or three hours to do a button, because I'm either messing around with tiny details or doing something completely and utterly new with it. You should really get some examples of your work. See Photo Finish Designs for a good example of a button-making site.

Updated List: 8/10. You seem to update rather frequently {judging, of course, from when you said your site was started!}, but you can do more than "one button done". Elaborate! Tell what you changed about the site! Tell who the button was for! Do SOMETHING other than just "one button done". That's boring. And, sadly, way too many people think that nobody reads their updates, but I do. So, be sure to use correct spelling while updating!! It makes it easier to guess what you're trying to say!

Other Problems: Your spelling. Some places you completely forget letters! Like in your most recent update, you misspelled "awhile" and "things", and forgot to capitalize the word "I". Little elementary-school spelling mistakes like that. And you should also have some examples of your work. Take a look at some other button-making sites, and you'll see what I mean. Like, the different size buttons you can make, what you can make them look like, etc., and that'll be good. Also, why'd you change your name? Syd's Buttons sounds a whole lot better than just "Link-Back Buttons". I've seen at least ten sites with the name "Link-Back Buttons", and yours makes Number Eleven. Try changing the name back.

Overall Score: 46/80. That's a 58%. Not bad for your first review. Keep working on your site, and use some of the things that I suggested to get your ratings up! Just because you're a Buttons-By-Request site doesn't mean that you can't have premade buttons {bases} ready for people to use!


Back to Top

Photo Finish Designs


Reviewed on Nov. 25, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer


First Glance: 10/10. Wow. The layout is truly stunning. I don't think I've ever seen one so colorful! It doesn't quite match your title {"Photo Finish Designs"}, but I think I can skip that for now. Even your text areas are coordinated with your background! Amazing! I absolutely love it!! Although, you might want to make the font a tad bigger. I had a little trouble reading it!

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. This may make me seem picky, but I absolutely loathe it when people use the word celeb. It takes only a few more keystrokes to write the word celebrity...four more keystrokes, to be precise! If you're going to write a word, please write it correctly. {And just as a side note...what is 'vector'?}

Neatness: 9/10. Everything's nicely laid out, although you only have navigation to your lookup and to neomail you, which is nice, but you should also have some in-site navigation {to the rules, pick-ups, & such}. That would make it nice! And...good job for putting the "Read Me" notice somewhere that people might actually LOOK! Great job!

Colors: 10/10. The blue & pink scheme that you use fits quite nicely with the background...of whatever the background image may be! It brings out the blue and the pink in the images. Nicely done. And the scrollbar was a nice touch. Most people think "Oh, nobody in FireFox will be able to see the scrollbar, so I'll just leave that off!" but the scrollbar is a very important part in Internet Explorer! Kudos, Candy!

Music: 10/10. No music. What a relief after the last few sites I reviewed! Annoying popstars would completely distract from the perfect site that you have here!

Age of Site: 8/10. You don't have a counter! Eeek! That's one of the most important parts of your site! You must have a counter!!! Oh, and you didn't update for a while {between August & October, there's only one update!}, so I had to subtract a point for that.

Quality: 9/10. Everything is amazing, and looks absolutely stunning. Although, I had to take away one point because everything looks nearly the same - all the bases have the same dotted border around them. Try making dashed borders, or different color borders other than black! Surely you have other colors than black for your bordering needs!

Updated List: 7/10. You have large gaps quite often in your updating. Even if you do nothing more than add a base, or add a request, be sure to update! Updating is how the 'customers' {and the reviewers!} know what you did, and when you did it!

Other Problems: The font's a bit tiny. Perhaps bump it up a size or two? It's really hard to read. And the Read Me notice underneath the Review Request box...that should probably be centered. One other thing is bothering me, though....If Carrot Soup is your review site...why did you review your site and give yourself a 100/100? Or is there another person that works with you for the review site? Because that seems a little....egotistical? Is that the word I'm looking for? I don't know.

Overall Score: 72/80. That's a 90%! Not only am I honored to be the first person to review your site, but you got an amazing score considering it's the first time I've reviewed you, and the first review you've gotten on this site {although you seem to have cheated and given yourself a 100/100 on your review site!}. Keep up the good work, Candy!


Back to Top

Casanova


Reviewed on Nov. 22, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 7/10. Hmm....the colors don't really match the main picture {which is, supposedly, a BCA layout!} And I see that you're flaunting your awards {That's what it looks like to me!} and you're also showing off your scores. *shakes head* That stuff should be near the bottom of the page!

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. I saw a few weird sentences, and some chatspeak! *gasp*

You neomail me the text in the textboxes filled out {{makes no sense to me; should be "with the text in the text boxes filled out"}}

Nuttin, kidd {{need I say more?}}

And what's with everything in the form boxes being captialized? Normally, all CAPS = yelling. That's not very nice....

Neatness: 7/10. You don't have any in-site navigation {that's a big no-no! You must have in-site navigation!}. Also, you're flaunting your review scores and your awards! Normally, the closer you put stuff to the top of the page, the more you're flaunting them. I suggest removing the "Reviews" from the main column and putting them in the side column, below the "Link Me" buttons. After moving the "Reviews", move the "Awards" to beneath the reviews. Sorry, but stuff like that usually makes me sick and makes me want to click away as fast as humanly possible!

Colors: 4/10. I....I just don't get it. It's supposedly a BCA layout...but it's all hot pink and orange? With one tiny pink ribbon in the main picture? What's that about? You should take the time to make a fully color-coordinated layout, not just slap a ribbon on the main picture and call it a BCA layout!

Music: 7/10. You say you have music...but I didn't hear any at all the time that I reviewed it, although I heard it earlier {and it was annoying}, so I can't be sure if you removed it or not. But the music was annoying.

Age of Site: 7/10. You say you've been open for about a month, but your updates only start on November 6! That's not good! What happened to all of the other updates? And where's your counter? And where's the date that your site was started? Where's all that? Hmmmm? It seems to be MIA {missing in action}! And you don't have very many graphics, considering you've been open for a month.

Quality: 5/10. Some of the stuff was downright weird. These three blends, actually.



The Avril Lavigne blend is blocky, the Demi blend is blocky as well {it's not even a blend! It's just a bunch of overlapped pictures!}, and the Jonas Brothers blend is a bit blurry in the background. I don't think that counts as a blend, though.

Updated List: 7/10. Your updates start on November 6, while you say your site's been open for about a month. That's a big no-no! Always update your site, even if it's something insignificant! Always!

Other Problems: Your "blends"! They aren't really blends at all! Also, move the "Reviews" and "Awards" sections to below your "Link Me?" section. That might help a little. And be sure to add a counter! That'll help a LOT! More than you know it! And, please, if you have a guild layout underneath "CSS", move it to the "Guild Layouts" section. It's confusing if you have it in two sections! Also, add some in-site navigation. That's a really big thing you're missing! And please, fix the horrible chatspeak! Nothing turns me off more than chatspeak!

Overall Score: 52/80. That's a 65%. Not bad for your first Siren Review! Just fix the problems, and you'll be well on your way to a star site!


Back to Top

Baybeluv08's Music + Icons

music + icons
Reviewed on Nov. 19, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 3/10. The flashy background was annoying, as was the music that blasted out of my speakers! *mutters*I resolve to read applications more carefully!*/mutter*

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. There were a few places where you missed punctuation, and this:

Music is in alphabety spagettie order by artist {the italicized words are spelled wrong, and make no sense whatsoever}

That sentence is really the only one that I noticed...everything else seemed okay and grammatically correct. Just remember punctuation!!

Neatness: 9/10. You have navigation on your page, but you don't have any going to your...erg...music codes. Which are illegal, by the way.

Colors: 7/10. The flashing skulls & hearts in the background is a bit much. *rubs eyes* It really blinded me for a second. But I should have turned on the overhead light before getting on the computer.

Music: 0/10. It's annoying. Very annoying. And if I weren't reviewing your site, I would have closed out the window a long time ago. The very moment the music started playing, to be exact.

Age of Site: 3/10. You don't have that many things for a site that's been open for two months {music codes...illegal as they may be, don't take too long to make}. And the icons that you have are all filched off the internet, if a certain sentence is to be believed!! Your one petpage seems to be pretty good, though. You should work on petpages, perhaps. It'd get you away from the "stealing" category.

Quality: 3/10. It's not that hard to make *illegal* music codes {I make them for MYSELF; I don't redistribute them!}, and the icons, I believe, are stolen off the internet. Your one petpage seems to be pretty well coded, though, which is a relief to me. But the flashy backgrounds are extremely annoying.

Updated List: 2/10. You have two updates. You've been open for almost two months. *shrugs* But it's your grade - if you're happy with two updates, far be it from me to rain on your parade.

Other Problems: MUSIC CODES ARE ILLEGAL. There, I've said it. If you're making music codes and are distributing them, the artist gets NO MONEY WHATSOEVER for that transaction! If I were in charge of Neopets, or the entire internet for that matter, I would go through the database and delete EVERY MUSIC CODE SITE THERE IS simply because they are illegal, and I hate to see people breaking the rules.

Oh, and you also have stolen icons on there, I believe. Icon requests are never open, because I only do my fave pics that I find around the internet Which makes me believe that you are STEALING the icons from the internet as well! That's not good! Please tell me you're not doing that!!!

Overall Score: 35/80. That's a 44%. Keep working on your site - get rid of the felonies that are on there, and, please, learn how to make your own icons. It's not really that hard, you know. And, most of all, try to get more updates, and possibly make some more petpages. The petpage you made, to be honest, is really the only thing of good quality on there. Sorry. But I'm a reviewer, and I have to be honest. If you don't like your score, fix up your site a bit, and you can resubmit for a review in 2-4 weeks.


Back to Top

Anime Block

Clicky!
Reviewed on Nov. 11, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 6/10. The main image is a bit messy, you have a lot scrolling in the boxes to the side, and all I see is your rules box....Which looks very out of place.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I only saw one thing...:

Don;t steal ANYTHING from these sites or mine {the ; needs to be an apostrophe!}

Neatness: 4/10. I can't really look at all of the sites in the marquees because they scroll a little too fast for my tastes, and your icons are all in a weird-shaped scrollbox....I had a lot of trouble trying to figure out where the scrollbox was. You might want to fix that.

Colors: 7/10. The background doesn't match your main image & vice-versa....

Music: 5/10. It's pretty cute at first, but it gets annoying FAST. And it doesn't seem to match your site...

Age of Site: 4/10. You have NO UPDATES, no counter {look at B O I N G D R A G O N for a counter; google it}, and it just looks like it was slapped up there and then applied for a review. Very messy.

Quality: 0/10. If you had made these, you would have gotten all 10 points. They were absolutely stunning {particularly the two Vampire Knight ones!}, but you just collected them without giving ANY credit to the original creator of the graphic. *shame shame* Fix that. Unless you're going to make your own, I would suggest closing down the site, considering that you have stolen icons on there! *gasp*

My favorite one:


Updated List: 0/10. Noooo updates. You should fix that. As soon as possible.

Other Problems: You really have no link-back buttons....you just have this HUGE banner that says "Graphix & Links" at the bottom of your page. You should really get a link-back button. Or if you have them, I can't find them.

You also need to get a counter, and perhaps organize your page a bit more. It's a little messy at the moment.

Overall Score: 35/80. That's a 44%. Oh, dear. I can give you a maximum of 10 more points if you tell me whether you made the icons or not {if you didn't, I'm sorry, but I can only give you 5 more points}. Just keep working on your site, and make sure that you have done EVERYTHING needed to do before you decide to submit for a review!!


Back to Top

Splashout Designs


Reviewed on Nov. 10, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. One little picture seems quite out of place in your blendy-image-header-thing....and the striped background doesn't seem to go with it....Also, the page looks as if it could be centered....possibly....

Spelling/Grammar: 8/10. I saw a few mistakes here and there {mistakes are italicized}:

cute, creative and fun graphics {there needs to be a comma after 'creative'}

want to come back for moree {self-explanatory}

asking if I'm done your {I'm should be I've}

neomail me by clikcing Here {if you don't know what's wrong, don't fix it 0.o}

And there were a few more, but I didn't want to be nitpicky!

Neatness: 9/10. Everything seemed to be in it's place...except for that nasty Neopets Credits thing! It's in the center of the page {not hidden by your layout}...just sticking out from behind it! Try to figure out how to get rid of it...or move it!....if you can.

Colors: 8/10. I don't think the purple-stripe-black-stripe background really matches, but it's your petpage.

Music: 10/10. No music! No make-my-ears-bleed music! *falls to knees* Thank you!!!

Age of Site: 7/10. You must try to find your date that you started the site! Aaaaah! And, get a counter. B O I N G D R A G O N {google it} is a good place to get one.

Quality: 7/10. You have some good things, but there are also some that I think could use some improvement:

Drag into Address Bar:


Just Look


Those were a few that seemed....weird...to me.

Updated List: 10/10. Since I don't know when you started out, I had to assume that you started on Sept. 22. So, you've updated a lot since then, and you're very thorough. Keep that up!

Other Problems: You need a counter. And possibly fix some of those really bland graphics {the "He made use sisters" one!}

Overall Score: 67/80. That's a 84%. Good job! Just fix the weird & random graphics, and keep working on your site in particular! I know you can do good! Just keep working on it!


Back to Top

Angel's Dailies


Reviewed Nov. 10, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 8/10. You have a tiny little problem with either your divs, or your headers. Make sure to end your divs, and make sure to start/end your headers correctly! But Kitty's CSS is really nice; that's the exact same layout I used to have before I made my own.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. The one really big thing that I found was that you didn't include an apostrophe in the word Angel's Dailies! It's a possessive proper noun, so you have to have an apostrophe! Everything else looked good, though.

Neatness: 8/10. I was a little confused at first {I thought the words pertained to the picture it was above, not beside}, but it's a really cute way of doing things; sort of like a ladder! But there's also that little itsy-bitsy problem of either not ending your divs correctly, not starting/ending your headers correctly, or doing something else that I have no clue how to fix!

Colors: 7/10. They don't really fit that of a dailies page.

Music: 10/10. Yaaaay! Music is one of the worst things I find on petpages; unless it's music that I like, or that goes well with the page, people normally get low scores in this catagory. But you have no music, which is fantastic! Music on a dailies page would be random and push people away instead of drawing them in.

Age of Site: 6/10. You have a grand total of two updates. Fantastical, considering that you've been open since "8/15/08". Always, always, ALWAYS update your site as often as you possibly can! That's the greatest thing to do when you have a site!! And get a counter. B O I N G D R A G O N {google it} has very good ones, and they are also easy to install!

Quality: 5/10. The pictures are a bit pixelly; certainly there are some other pictures that you could have picked? They don't have to be of that certain activity, mind you! Just a simple picture of something related to the picture...like a healing potion for the healing springs, etc., would have been fine! But your link-back buttons are pretty :D Although you might want more variety....you have three of them, and they are all the same style!

Updated List: 7/10. I decided to be a bit generous with this one. Even though you only have two updates {one from October, one from November}, it might be sort of hard to properly update a dailies page...so I'll let you off with a warning this time!

Other Problems: The weird little green bars between the "main page" sections! I've never seen that before, and I used that style of Kitty's CSS for months! Also, you'll need a counter, and you'll also need to update more often! That's important! And be sure to fix the Angels Dailies thing!

Overall Score: 60/80. That's a 75%! Congratulations! Keep working on your site. It's awesome so far, and with a little hard work and determination {plus, try to get a custom layout/make one yourself}, you'll have an awesome dailies page! Keep going!


Back to Top

Toxic Exhilaration


Reviewed Nov. 10, 2008
Reviewed in Internet Explorer
First Glance: 7/10. It's incredibly busy, and you have your awards at the very top of the page, which sounds to me like you're screaming, "HEY! LOOK AT ME! I GOT AN AWARD! AREN'T I SPECIAL??!!!", and that's not very nice. And even though I really, really, really dislike the Jonas Brothers, I didn't take off any points for that because that would be rude. The main picture is very well done.

Spelling/Grammar: 6/10. Eek. I saw a lot of mistakes before I even scrolled down. I'll try my best to point them out to you {mistakes that need to be fixed are italicized}:

#3: I am espically careful with music codes that you do not take off the link, so don't!

#4: Don't so call claim them as your graphics, or someone else's, but us {didn't understand this one AT ALL!}

#7: You may not edit any graphics without permission, and because edited we still need to see our credit {didn't make sense whatsoever; if you don't want them to edit graphics, if they edit them you still need the credit?}

There were a LOT more, trust me, but if I put them ALL on this page...we wouldn't have a lot of room for the rest of the review!

Neatness: 8/10. It took me FOREVER to make sense of your site! And the squishy-looking petpage previews look nasty. Just put a Text Link instead of an image link! If you squish an image link, it looks all gross! And it also took me a lot of scrolling to figure out where the heck your link back buttons were. You should put the Link Back buttons BEFORE your Awards! Putting awards at the top of your page sounds to me like you're screaming at us, saying "OMG! I GOTTA AWARD! I GOTTA AWARD!!"

Colors: 9/10. The weird yellows and pinks in the headers don't really match; the blues are the best ones. The yellows and pink look awkward and out of position.

Music: 0/10. AAAUUUUGGGHHHHH!!!!! Hannah Montana! I probably should have asked you what the music was. Hannah Montana.....possibly the worst singer I've ever heard. And the music itself scared me. Sorry, but you asked for my opinion, and this is mine. Eurgh. *turns volume off* You should put the "What's Playing" thing at the top of the page. I would have been spared some ear-bleeding x.x

Age of Site: 7/10. Your updates start at Oct. 27 - not good, considering that you told me you opened "LATE AUGUST/EARLY SEPT. 08". Your updates should have started when your site started. Shame, shame.

Quality: 10/10. I struggled with this, simply because I extremely dislike Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus, the Jonas Brothers, and several other Disney Celebrities....except for Raven Symone, Zack & Cody, and Drake & Josh. Those are really the only TV celebs I like {and yes, I know D&J are on Nick!} But everything of yours is nicely laid out. Good job.

Updated List: 7/10. ALWAYS make sure that your NEWEST updates are at the TOP! I don't like waiting for the ENTIRE list to scroll down just so I can see your new updates! That's incredibly annoying! And while you're at it, put the updates in a scrollbox, not a marquee. I don't like having to read the things in a marquee unless they're really, really, really short.

Other Problems: Music Codes are ILLEGAL. When you make them, you are NOT giving the original artist ANY money for their song, and you are redistributing their music without their permission. That's copyright infringement, and is TOTALLY illegal! If you do it just for yourself, that'd be fine {I do music codes solely for myself as well}, but making them to give to other people? Illegal. Certainly, definetly, absolutely!

Your updates marquee.Switch them around so the NEW updates are at the front....and put them in a scrollbox.

Fix your grammatical/spelling errors! I saw a lot of them!

Remove the picture of yourself. That's totally against Neopets' rules. You don't want to get frozen, do you? {Yes, it's a picture of you when you were eight, but it still counts as a picture of you!}

Move: The awards, the fanmail, {both to the bottom of the page; awards underneath "Reviews", and "fanmail" underneath the counter}, and the "Now Playing" section to the TOP of the page. I want to know what kind of music I'll be listening to before I go to the site itself, otherwise my ears might just fall off. *shudders*

Overall Score: 54/80. That's a 68%. Fix the problems, and you'll be on your way to a very good site :D


Back to Top

Destiny Devine


Reviewed Nov. 4, 2008
Reviewed in FireFox


First Glance: 9/10. It looks like it'll be a pretty amazing site, but I wonder....did you misspell "Divine" on purpose? Or did you not realize you misspelled it at all? Or is "Devine" not supposed to mean "divine"?

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I didn't see anything misspelled, and I noticed that you had a note saying "I KNOW I misspelled divine, but I like it that way!" But, as a reviewer, and as a person who absolutely detests misspellings....I had to take off half a point. The other half a point is due to the fact that your font is extremely tiny, and I have to lean in very close to the screen in order to see it!

Neatness: 8/10. Everything's inside it's own little 4-group-scroll-boxes, which is pretty neat, but it's an ABSOLUTE PAIN to try to copy the codes! I mean, seriously....your text area's are only one pixel in height....I couldn't copy ANYTHING without trying for ten minutes! I'm not kidding. It took me three minutes to figure out how to get your link-back button. Finally, I gave up on the text area and just copied the properties code {right-click, "properties"} and added the URL instead.

Colors: 10/10. Everything works together rather nicely.

Music: 10/10. Even if I wasn't in FireFox, I wouldn't hear any music anyways. Great job keeping your site disney-celeb free! :D

Age of Site: 8/10. You have a fair number of hits on your counter....but your "Updates" section leaves something to be desired. You only have 7 updates on there, and you told me in your neomail that you've been up for about three weeks there. And I don't see a single "This site was opened on ----", or "Counter started on ----" anywhere on the site! Nowhere at all!

Quality: 7/10. Some of your things are really, really simple, like these:



And you don't have previews for some of your lookups, so how do I know what they look like? You should ALWAYS have some sort of preview, somewhere! And the first Airbrushed CSS, the Jhudora one, refused to load for me in both IE and FF. You might want to check into that.

Updated List: 4/10. That's about one-third of 10, isn't it? After all, you only have 7 updates, and your site has been open for almost three weeks. Surely there was SOMETHING that you've done? Unless you were grounded? Didn't feel like updating? Etc, etc, etc? I update my graphics site nearly every day {unless I'm grounded}, and I make sure people know what's going on.

Other Problems: The irritatingly small font. That's annoying. And the extremely annoying teeny-tiny text area boxes. I gave up on every one of them. I don't see how people can COPY the freakin' codes! I had to right-click on the icons I wanted to show you, and then go to Properties in order to actually get the img code! That's not right! Oh, and your updates. Do something about them.

Overall Score: 58/80. That's a 72%. Pretty good for a relatively-new site! Just keep working on it, and fix the few things that I noticed, and you'll have an awesome site on your hands!


Back to Top

Rainbow Tears ReReview


Reviewed Nov. 3, 2008


First Glance: 9/10. It looks awesome. I even sort of like the opacity filter you put over the header-banner, to show the rainbow stripes through it. I took off a point, however, because you put "Banner by: Rainbow Tears" on the banner. It's pretty obvious that, if you don't have credit on the banner, you made it. *unsure*

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I saw one tiny misspelling, "Yippee!" was spelled as "YIPEE!" in your update-marquee, but I decided not to be an insanely harsh reviewer and take off one point for that :D

Neatness: 8/10. You say in your updates-section that you have "fixed the lookups button", but there are no lookups to be found! Eek! Also, the "Blends/Banners" link in your navigation doesn't work. At all. And you should probably add some "back to top" links somewhere. I, for one, don't like to scroll all the way back up to the top after I've clicked on a link. It gets annoying.

Colors: 10/10. They all seem to match rather well. Good job.

Music: 10/10. No music. I was listening to my own music at the time, and if your site had started blaring out its own music, I probably would have screamed and clicked the big red 'x' in the corner!

Age of Site: 7/10. You have no counter, your updates start at Oct. 13, and the only indication that you've been up for a while are the words proclaiming that you've been up since August 3, 2008. And with two staff members, I would think you'd get more done than is on your page....

Quality: 6/10. I'm going to be honest here: all of your icons follow the exact same format: the credit in HUGE letters in the upper-left corner, and the name of the person blinking across the bottom. That's not very original; not original at all. Spice it up! Throw in some variety! Make something original! Although I must admit, your "shreds", as you call them, are extremely cute. Make more! The one that you currently have is quite cute! And while there is also something to be said about the outlines....you have no banners, and several of the things that were there when I reviewed your site a few months ago have been ripped away. *shakes head* They were good, too! The cursors were a nice variety from the dull icons.

Updated List: 6/10. You've been up since August 3, but you only have updates beginning Oct. 13. And they're in a marquee, so I have to see the OLD updates before the NEW ones. If you could possibly do something about this....make the marquee into a SCROLLBOX! That way, you can scroll through the updates instead of just looking at them sail by. And please, put the NEW updates BEFORE!!!! the OLD ones! Please!

Other Problems: The repeating icons. Bland, bland, bland. No variety there. And the updates list. You might want to do something about that. And the offsite affiliates. You could possibly get into BIG trouble for posting offsite links! And you don't actually "use" your site key - it's still there for decoration alone. *sighs*

Overall Score: 66/80. That's a 82%. Fix your icons {make them interesting!} and the no-use-of-site-key thing, and you'll have an awesome site on your hands! Keep going! That's the important part is to NEVER GIVE UP!


Back to Top

Me's Customs


I am reviewing your site in FireFox, like you asked! FireFox!


First Glance: 8/10. Nice header-banner, but the layout looks a little....plain. There are no pretty pictures {Save for the link-back buttons, and the blue envelopes}, and it looks a little bland.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I saw a few mistakes, such as They are hard work, which makes no sense to me, and Yes! Send the forms in and I will ASAP!, which also makes no sense. Fragmented sentences = a big no-no!

Neatnes: 9/10. Everything seems to be in it's place :D That's fanastical! Although, I took off a point, because when I hovered over the words in the headers....THEY MOVED! Are they supposed to do that?? It's weird!

Colors: 10/10. They all fit together nicely, although brown is a little bland. But then again, this is coming from the completely black-and-white site with bright blue font, so I don't know. *shrugs*

Music: 10/10. Since I'm using FireFox, I wouldn't be able to hear the music anyways, so that's a good thing! *heeheehee* Music annoys the heck out of me - sometimes. When it's my own music, I don't mind at all!

Age of Site: 9/10. You seem to have had a lot of visitors since Oct. 23 {the first date in your updates list}, and you have updated nearly every day, so that's fantastic! But since you are a "by request" site, you don't really have all-that-many permanent graphics. Only the Not UFT signs are permanent, yes?

Quality: 10/10. I can't argue with myself here - they're all fantastic. Although the buttons do look a bit like the "Button Requests by Cass" buttons. But that's okay - I know you aren't ripping off Cass's designs! The Not UFT banners, however, are all exactly alike, and that can get a little....*searches for word*...boring. Try jazzing them up a little!

Updated List: 10/10. You seem to have updated every day since your site was started, and you are very meticulate in your updates. Good job.

Other Problems: Nothing that I could spot. Good job. Oh - but I did notice that you didn't have my button up there - *wags finger*

Overall Score: 75/80. That's a 94%! Congrats! Keep working on your site - I know you have a lot of potiential, and potiential is good!


Back to Top

Siddey's String ReReview


Reviewed October 22


First Glance: 10/10. Everything looks nice and neat, and it looks like there's a lot to this site! I shall investigate further....

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I saw one MINOR mistake...."a lot" is two words, and in your blog, Siddey Speaks, you put it as "alot". But I didn't want to be an incredibly harsh grader, so I simply swept it under the carpet....*heh heh heh*

Neatness: 9/10. The only thing I noticed is that on your "SS Help & Templates" section, the "A Quick Intro" link is broken! x.x That is NOT good at all! Fix it, Siddey! Fix it, fix it, fix it!

Colors: 10/10. I have no quams with your colors. They're all very neat....although your buttons are a little...awkward. They're purple, and your site is blue and green. Interesting.

Music: 10/10. No music! *dances to my own music* Yep! No music here! And that's a good thing, too! Music on a CSS site? Not only confusing, but distracting as well!

Age of Site: 9/10. I can't see your counter {I can only assume the BoingDragon glitch has struck again - simply 'edit' your counter on BoingDragon, and it'll go back to normal}. Everything else seems to be in order, though!

Quality: 10/10. All of your CSS seems to be nice, neat, and simple. I tried one of your gallery layouts last time I reviewed your site, and was nearly blinded, though! Try putting "black" as the color instead of red. That hurt my eyes! I was too lazy to check it out this time, but hopefully you changed that!

Updated List: 9/10. I can see that you just recently started adding your updates in a blog. Good job. *nod nod* That's what I do on my graphics site. And the marquee isn't annoying at all!

Other Problems: Like you mentioned on your own site, the annoying little purple box! What were you going to do, put a marquee in it so it would scroll across the little box and announce little things? That would have been neat! Also, you need to fix your counters....and possibly your link-back buttons. But that's your choice entirely!

Overall Score: 77/80. That's a 97%! Congratulations!! *dances again* I suppose I'll have to create an award for you....Oh yeah! *dances to the music again* And...I shall be submitting my graphics site soon for your "Review Page", so don't forget that! Also....you've been an amazing help with my CSS problems, so I am grateful to you for that ^.^


Back to Top

PupisRule234's Premades


Reviewed October 21
First Glance: 4/10. Yeech. Your layout is in need of some attention - immediantly. It's not in the proper scrollbox "areas", which I presume you made for the graphics to fit in. You might want to check that out...

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. I saw a few mistakes here and there {"flea's" is one of them. Take out the apostrophe}{"me, my eight year old sister, and my mom" is another. Put "me" after "mom", and you'll be fine.}

Neatness: 7/10. Your layout needs attention - STAT. It's so messed up I don't know what to think! Oh, and you need some sort of in-page navigation, so I don't have to scroll through the entire page to look at everything!

Colors: 9/10. I have to admit, it fits together rather well...but it looks like you stole the navigation coding from somewhere...*unsure* It looks a lot like the coding from Kitty's Premades. Did you know that? If you didn't take them....you should probably switch the colors a bit more so they match better!

Music: 10/10. Music would be annoying on this sort of page - congrats for keeping your page music-free!

Age of Site: 6/10. You say you've been open for a month, but you only have 2 updates!! Get more updates, as soon as you possibly can! When did you add the rest of the stuff? When?? WHEN?

Quality: 6/10. I have no quams with your lookups...but your so-called "glitters", however, don't look like glitters at all!


These are more "blurs" than "glitters"! I don't see a single sparkle on any of these!

Updated List: 1/10. You have only two updates. That's sort of sad, considering that you have more than two graphics!

Other Problems: The layout. The layout. The Layout. That's the most obvious problem right now! There's also the matter of the blur-glitters, but that's another story. And....add updates whenever you update the site, or people might not know what's going on!!

Overall Score: 59/80. That's a 74%! Congratulations! So far, your site seems to be doing rather well. You just need to update a bit more, fix the blur-glitters, and, most importantly, FIX THE LAYOUT. And that's my rant for today! Cheers!


Back to Top

Katherine's Blinkies

First Glance: 10/10. DUCKS!!!! Wonderful, fantabulous DUCKS!!!! Erm...*cough* Sorry. Got a little excited there. Now, I know you said your site didn't have a name, so I just added "Katherine" to the "Blinkies" that you gave me. So, I technically named your site "Katherine's Blinkies" for this review. *heh heh heh*

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. You didn't capitalize the word "I" somewhere, and you forgot the apostrophes in two contractions, "didnt" and "dont", which are both in your sidebar, underneath "Requests".

Neatness: 9/10. Everything seems nice and neat ^.^ Only one thing seems out of place...this random cog-wheel thing. 0.o


Colors: 10/10. Everything matches. There are even little ducks in the headers! It's so cute!! And, of course, the blinkies are adorable, even if they don't feature ducks ^.^

Music: 10/10. I don't know how a blinkie site would work with music, anyways! XD Good job keeping it "clean"!

Age of Site: 8/10. You've been open for "about a month", as you say, and I know how hard blinkies are to do {it took me a few days to make my first one because I stink at blinkies!}, and you probably want to procrastinate! But you should probably look into a counter. B O I N G D R A G O N, I know, has good counters.

Quality: 10/10. Everything's amazing! Especially the rainbow one!

See??! And the cow one is cute! The only one that is rather out-of-place is the cog-y one. That doesn't seem blinkie-ish to me.

Updated List: 0/10. It really, really pained me to give you a zero in this category, after you've been doing so well! But, I had to keep the review fair and honest. And you don't have an updated list. You should probably add one! I can give you the code for a scrollbox, or you could try to find is somewhere! Good luck!

Other Problems: You just need to get a counter and add some updates, and you'll be fine! Oh, and add more blinkies. They're awesome!

Overall Score: 66/80. That's an 82%!! Keep working on your site, and you'll rise to the top!! Your site is awesome, and I know I'll be checking in on it occassionaly....if only to watch the cow blinkie!


Back to Top

Cursors by Design

Cursors by Design has changed to "Graphics by Design
First Glance: 6/10. It's a premade glitter font with a lot of text. Not the most exciting layout I've ever seen, but certainly not the worst. And the music blasted out of my speakers. It was really annoying.

Spelling/Grammar: 5/10. You use a lot of chatspeak'd words, such as "u" instead of "you", and "Im" instead of "I'm". Is it really too much trouble to type the extra letters and make yourself seem literate?

Neatness: 7/10. Um...well...your site isn't very "neat" at all. You have a teeny-tiny little navigation section at the top, then we have to scroll all the way through your site, and then all the way back to the top....you should really add "back to Top" links throughout your page.

Colors: 7/10. It's really a mess. The top words don't match the background, and the background pink doesn't match the foreground pink! You have three different pinks on your page! And then you have the rainbow background underneath your nav links! What's up with that?!

Music: 2/10. The music's incredibly annoying. In fact, if I had been just a random visitor to your site, I think I might have closed out the page the second music started streaming out of my speakers. But I had to review it, so I turned my volume all the way down. Annoying music, really.

Age of Site: 7/10. You seem to have been open for a little while, but you have no counter, no updates...nothing that tells me when you've added new things or how many visitors you've had. You have a lot of graphics, however.

Quality: 4/10. Some of the things look like you just tossed them together, and some others look downright hideous. These are the things I did not like:



You also just took some random snapshots of smileys to use in your graphics. *shakes head*

Updated List: 0/10. You have no updates whatsoever. That's very bad.

Other Problems: Cursors "Striped Lenny" through "Sketch Zafara" show up as Tyrannian Myncis when they are "hover-overed". Also, you have no updates {you should fix that}, and you took some of your "glitter" graphics from an online cheap program - jellymuffin. You should get rid of those and learn how to make graphics with a program.

Overall Score: 38/80. That's a 47%. You just have to keep working on your site and make sure that you do good-quality graphics. Don't just stick anything up there! Take the time to make sure everything looks good and works correctly!


Back to Top

Twinkle Graphics

First Glance: 9/10. It's an amazing picture, to be sure, and the page looks like it's going to be fun to look at....but the picture itself is in the center of the page, while the layout is aligned to the right. The picture should be aligned to the right as well.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything. And trust me; I looked over EVERYTHING.

Neatness: 8/10. You have a "Pixels" section in your navigation bar, yet you don't have a "pixels" section within your page. And your "Lookups" link in your nav bar goes to you "Mood Indicators" section. You might want to fix that.

Colors: 9/10. They all match up pretty darn well.

Music: 10/10. I didn't hear any music, and your page goes quite well without any music! On your neomail to me, however, you said you had music. So, either the mp3 broke, or you never had music on there to begin with.

Age of Site: 9/10. You seem to have a lot of stuff up there, and you've been open for nearly a month {according to your first update}. Just keep working on your stuff!

Quality: 7/10. Some of the stuff wasn't the greatest out there....The following images, for example:






{this is a blog of yours; I resized it to fit in the page}

Also, there's a broken link in the "Mood Indicators" section.....A broken picture, I should say. And there are no previews of the petpages; we're just left to wonder what they'll look like.

Updated List: 5/10. To me, an "Update" section and a "Blog" section are basically the same thing. I use my "blog", so to speak, as an updates section for my Graphics Page. I get to voice my concerns, say what's going on, and tell what I've updated on my site! You may want to combine your "Updates" and your "blog" section into one and the same!

Other Problems: Not many at all. Just the few really weird/simple graphics, and the broken image in your "Mood Indicators" section. Also, if I were you, I'd come up with a neat and spiffeh way to do your mood indicators! The "normal" style is really bland. A few weeks ago, I imagined a new style on my graphics site, and it turned out really well! You can't use that style, mind you, because it's mine, but use your imagination and come up with something unique!

Overall Score: 67/80. That's an 83%! Congratulations!! Just keep working on your site and fix the few errors that I found, and I KNOW that you can make it into a fantastically wonderful site one day!


Back to Top

2 Stars Graphics Re-Review

First Glance: 9/10. The blue background doesn't really match the top picture...Maybe make the top picture a little blue-er? Or make the background the blackish-gray color. And this comes from Xwee, the color expert. Apparently. *huffs* Don't steal my review, Xwee!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see any. Good job! And I see you've changed "2 Starz Graphix" to "2 Stars Graphics". Great ^.^

Neatness: 9/10. I'm going to be honest; I don't think that awards should be at the top of the page itself. It should be more near the bottom; that way, people won't think you're flaunting your site's awards. That's what I sort of thought when I first stepped into your page, quotes Shoyru. I must agree with her. You see, having awards at the top is sort of like saying "Hey! I got an award and YOU didn't! Hah!" Or at least that's what it seems like to me.... And the layout, to me, seems like it should be centered rather than being off to the side like that. But that's just me. I'm weird like that!

Colors: 9/10. Like I said before {Ahem!} er, like Xwee said before, the blue background is at odds with the black welcoming picture.

Music: 10/10. Music is annoying and distracting. Not to mention that Xwee ties me up every time we go to a petpage because she's scared of my reaction! Chia cries. And I must agree. When Chia hears music that he doesn't like, or if the music is loud and annoying, he normally goes into a caffine-fueled rage that lasts for hours - or at least until the page is destroyed.

Age of Site: 9/10. You have a lot of hits since the beginning of September, but you don't say anywhere on your site when you began the site itself!

Quality: 9/10. They're all very good, and some of the lookups are much better than what I can do myself {see: Kitty's userlookup} but...the Nancy Drew one {I think it's Nancy Drew!} just doesn't seem very....*searches for right word* good. Now, that's just my opinion; if you like it, then by all means keep it!

Updated List: 8/10. Marquees. What are they good for? Short, tiny, updates. If you're going to keep your updates in that box, might I suggest this code?

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned before; The out-of-place background, the funny-looking lookup, and the marquee'd updates. but otherwise, it's an awesome site! I really like what you've done with it! Oh! And also....you might want to get rid of the "blogs" section until you've actually got the blogs up there! Just so there's no confusion!

Overall Score: 73/80. That's a 92%! congratulations! Keep working on your site! I know I'll come back some day, just to see how you keep improving it!!


Back to Top

Blinking Lookups


Reviewed on October 4.
First Glance: 10/10. Wow; this looks like it's going to be an interesting page! Of course, if Xwee wouldn't tie up Chia before I open every webpage, it would get done faster *sigh*

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I employed Xwee, the most intelligent of my neopets, to check over the text. Xwee? It was very nice. Everything is spelled correctly, and I didn't see any grammatical errors. An A+ to you on this catagory!

Neatness: 8/10. The only thing I didn't like about it was the marquee'd updates, states Shoyru. Why? Well, it's all in a line, and it's hard to read it while it scrolls horizontally. Might I suggest an "Updates" section on the sidebar, like my dear Kitty has on this page? Hm. I think she has a point. But other than that marquee, everything seems to be in order! Except you have me down as "Kitty's Reviews". I'm guessing I became your affie before I switched the site to "Siren's Song Reviews". I'd appreciate it if you'd change that ^.^

Colors: 9/10. They all match, although the colors for the links are hard to read on the white background. Perhaps you could make the yellow a little more golden-colored, so it'd be easier to read?

Music: 10/10! Great job. Music is downright annoying {plus, considering that Kitty's listening to her iPod at the moment....it would clash. Extremely.}

Age of Site: 9/10. You told me in a neomail not to rate based on quantity, and I understand. Lookups take a long time to code {well, mine didn't; but mine's a simple one!} and you also have school to deal with {I'm guessing you're in school *unsure*}, so I understand. Your counter has a good number of hits, and you have at least 6 lookups on your page, so you're good to go! Keep working on advertising your page, too!

Quality: 10/10. This is one thing that I cannot argue with. Even Chia can't argue with this! Amazing. Especially your Meepit one {your lookup}! I dislike ketchup as well, he states. And if Chia likes them, anybody'd like them! Just be glad Chia's not in league with the Meepits - his brain-washing machine would be invaluable to them!

Updated List: 8/10. I believe I mentioned this before: the sideways-scrolling marquee. It's hard to read it. Why not put a NON-MARQUEE updates box in the sidebar, right below your counter? *pokes my updates box* Like that one?

Other Problems: It's "Siren's Song Reviews" not, not "Kitty's Reviews"! Change that. And work on adding more lookups! Your skills surpass mine in every way! Keep up the good work!

Overall Score: 74/80. That's a 93%! Amazing! Just fix the small problems, and I'm sure that you can go all the way to 100% one day! Keep going!


Back to Top

PixelFreak


Reviewed on October 4.
First Glance: 9/10. It looks like it's going to be a very neat, nice, organized page. I like organization! And the two pixels at the top are soooo CUTE ^.^

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I looked it over, and could find nothing misspelled or grammatically incorrect! And believe me, Minxii, Kitty goes over EVERYTHING possible when grading sites! Everrrrything!

Neatness: 10/10. I can tell that you cut no corners with the presentation! Everything is nicely laid out, and I can find it quite easily! Although, meh, Chia, must say that your layout makes meh hunnngrrrryyyy!

Colours: 10/10. And this is where I step in. I love your layout, and it works very well with your background, and your entire "PixelFreak" site. Thanks for your opinion, Xwee. You took the words right out of my mouth....

Music: 10/10. Once again, you've topped the charts! Great job! And might I say, music on a pixel page is often annoying, so great job keeping yours clear of over-rated pop stars!

Age of Site: 8/10. You told me in a neomail that you've been open for 3 months, but I don't see a counter anywhere D: You can aquire one at B O I N G D R A G O N, which you can google. You can even use a pixel template for your counter! Just remember to add, somewhere on your site, when your site was opened, and when you started the counter!!

Quality: 10/10. Once again, I was blown away by your pixels. They're amazing!


This reminds me of the dancing magic mushroom in A Link to the Past {a Zelda game}. I love the mushrooms ^.^


It's hamtaro time! *swisha swisha swisha swisha vroom!* Hamtarooooo! Now I have the song stuck in my head, thanks to your Hamtaro-looking pixel!

Updated List: 10/10. Although you don't seem to update as often as possible now {I'm guessing school's the problem?}, at least you keep all of your updates! And they're in a nice, neat scrollbox too! Congrats!

Other Problems: My kitten on the keyboard D: And my other kitten on top of a 6 foot tall bookcase! But those are my personal problems. Your site doesn't seem to have any more problems, but...you may want to add a nice banner at the top, proclaiming that your site is PixelFreak. And you may want to add a counter!

Overall Score: 77/80. That's a 96%! {Which is better than what Kitty's last math test was....*heh heh heh*}Congratulations! Keep working on your site, and I'm sure you can get a 100% one day!


Back to Top

Starry_Mimi's Dailies


Reviewed on October 1st
First Glance: 7/10. It's a little...boring. Employ someone to make you an awesome header-banner! Right now, it's just a plain, tiny banner that says "Starry_Mimi's Dailies" on it. Chia says that's not right. Banners should be beautiful; they are supposed to welcome your visitors to your petpage! Oh, and after I was done staring at the tiny banner, I noticed a lot of text, and very few pictures.....

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. You have a weird sort of font - it all looks squished together, and it's quite tiny. But it's very neat - nice and sort-of easy to read. Like xweetok mentioned, it's got that weird, almost squished-looking look to it.

Neatness: 8/10. It's all very nicely organized and such, but Shoyru begged me to take a point or two off. Why? You don't have any in-site navigation, she states. In order for people to quickly move around your site, you must include in-site navigation, NOT just Neopets Navigation {games, boards, ect.}. And I agree with her. Add in-site navigation!

Colors: 10/10. You aced this catagory. As Chia elegantly stated, Even uh slow-talkin', un-smarty chia like meh can see that it's purty! Um....Yeah. The grays-and-blacks mix very well together, and I like it. Then again, my graphics site is mostly grays and blacks. Gray and Black are my favorite colors {not in that order, of course!}

Music: 10/10. Another acing! I'll allow Xwee to explain this one: Music on sites distract me, and they make Chia foam at the mouth, particularly Hannah Montana or other Disney Channel Celeb music. I tied Chia up before I allowed Kitty to click on your site link. I was terrified that he'd go stark raving mad like he did last week....*shifty eyes* Okay. I think she explained that rather well. Music is distracting on dailies pages!

Age of Site: 9/10. This one was a little hard to do. Since Chia's currently wrecking havoc on another site {*cough* I had nothing to do with it, Kitty! *cough*}, I have this catagory all to myself. You didn't update for nearly a month, and you don't seem to have had a lot of hits on your counter. Only about 330 hits since June? That's incredibly. Advertise your dailies page on the NeoBoards! Get listed in Directories! Just do things to get your site noticed!

Quality: 9/10. This one was a hard catagory as well. You're not technically a "graphics" site, so I had to put on my "Your-not-a-graphics-maker-so-I-can't -judge-you-like-that" hat. What I came up with was this: All of the regular pictures {the links} are nice and clear, but two of your link back buttons;




...look a little "off" to me. The first one...the words look a bit..."off". They look sort of blurry to me. Then again, I've been staring at the computer screen for a few hours, so maybe it's just me. And with the second one...The words look pixelly as well. I'm probably one of the only people that'd notice that, mind you! I check pages over completely!

Updated List: 7/10. I noticed that you took nearly a month-long hiatus from updating, and I sort of understand that. After all, dailies sites don't need to be updated quite as often as regular sites! Graphics sites and directories need to be updated quite often, while there aren't all that many "new" things to add to dailies sites for a few months, sometimes! ...But of course, that still doesn't mean that you can slack off! Check through your links! Apply for directories! Do something between in the long gaps between new dailies!

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned, I believe. The tiny header-banner, and the "updation" gaps. Oh, and Chia's brainwashing of my screenie fans, but you can't do anything about that!

Overall Score: 70/80. That's an 86%! Great job! Keep working on your site, and one day you'll most likely rise all the way to the top!

.....I have to go now. Chia's trying to take over the world.....again.


Back to Top

Pixel Dust

First Glance: 9/10. Dinosaurs - on a pixel page. Weird, but the colors match, so I'm not going to take off too much! The page appears to be nice and neat, but that's what the rest of the review is for - to put everything underneath a microscope! Let's go!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I looked it over {thankfully, you don't have a lot of text!} and there were no spelling mistakes {although I did look up "wherever" on Google, only to find that it was spelled correctly!}. I didn't take off for "awesomest", though, even though I sort of wanted to, because I use words like "Fantabulous!" a lot.

Neatness: 9/10. You pretty much aced this category, but I had to take off a point for having no in-site navigation. You do have Neopets navigation, which is nice, but you should also have in-site navigation. Like "Click here for Cupcake pixels", and it takes you to the cupcake section. Or, maybe you should separate your pixels into sections such as "Food", "Animals", etc., so it's easier to navigate.

Colors: 10/10. Everything works really well together, and I'm happy for that! Although the dinosaurs do look a little odd in the background....but I didn't count off for that.

Music: 10/10. Another acing in a category! Be happy! *dances to the 'Don't worry, be happy now!' song* Okaaaayyy....that was weird. BUT! - don't worry. Your site is awesome enough without music. It's great! And I'm enjoying what I'm seeing so far!

Age of Site: 9/10. You've been open for a while {Since Sept. 15, to be exact!}, and you have a lot of updates, and your page views seems to be coming along rather well.....but....{Oh, the dreaded 'but'!} you only have 8 pixels....that I think you made. Think, I say, because some of them are linked to other places. Why not put the stuff that you got from other pixel sites in a different section? A section all it's own? That would make more sense, than to just have them randomly scattered about!

Quality: 10/10. I can't argue with my multiple personalities over this one - your pixels rock! It makes my pixels seem rather....sad in comparison. Then again, I just began making them today!

My Pixel:


YOUR PIXELS:


Your pixels RULE!


Updated List: 10/10. It looks like you update quite often - keep going! That's good.

Other Problems: The dinosaurs. They look out of place. But otherwise....AMAZING site! Oh, and making me review it in FireFox - I don't really like firefox! But I'll do it - for the sake of your pixel site!

Overall Score: 77/80. That's a 96%. GREAT JOB!!! *does a happy dance* Keep going with your site, and keep adding more pixels! Your site is definitely one I'll revisit one day!


Back to Top

Fresh Directory

First Glance: 7/10. Wow - the background really hurt my eyes, and the white foreground looks out of place - a lot.

Spelling/Grammar: 4/10. You misspelled Affiliates, and you have a lot of grammatical errors in your "Poogle Day" news article. Also, News is spelled N E W S, not N E W Z. When people purposefully mispell words because they think it looks "cool", it sort of offends me. I check over everything to make sure that it's spelled correctly before I even try to save it, and you should too. MS Word has a spellchecker.

Neatness: 3/10. All of the buttons are a different size, and there's no navigation bar whatsoever. The background doesn't match at all, which caused me to take points off. A good "regulation size" button would be 88x31 pixels, and since things are catagorized alphabetically instead of by catagory {graphics, review sites, pet directories, ect.}, it's harder to find what you want. You might want to look at other directories to get a good idea of what you want to do. Also, why not put your "News" articles on a seperate page? You seem to have two other pets that you can put the page on. You can simply link your "News" page to your directory, if you wish.

Colors: 7/10. Well, the background doesn't really match, and there's not much of a layout to speak of. It's an annoying flashy background with a white foreground. A good place to get layouts is HERE There are a lot of neat styles to choose from - over 13, if my memory serves me correctly. But if you want to keep your layout, by all means do. You seem to like it.

Music: 3/10. Personally, I incredibly dislike the music. It's annoying. If I wasn't having to review your site, I think I'd close it out. Right now, I have the volume turned down on my computer so I won't hear the music. Also, the song doesn't really fit in with your directory....

Age of Site: 5/10. Your counter was added today, but there's no mention of when the site itself was started. You do happen to mention poogle day, but I can't remember when that was, and you should always put the dates on your "News" articles....Otherwise, how will people know when you wrote them?

Quality: 4/10. Since your site is not a graphics site, I had to review it differently, and directories are normally my strong point. You see, when I go to a directory, I'm looking for it to be neat, catagorized, and have no music. Yours is organized alphabetically {which makes things hard to find!}, has some of the most annoying music I've come across in a while, and all of your buttons are different shapes and sizes. Some good directories to look at to get an example of are Midnight Secrets and The Faerie Compass. The first one is a "normal" button-directory, and the second one is a Text-Link-Directory. You may get some ideas from them!

Updated List: 0/10. There are no updates {that I can see!}. Try adding an updates section! That would be the best thing to do right away, before you can even think about adding more links! Keep going!

Other problems: Simply what I mentioned before: The misspelling of "Affiliate", the no-updates section, the really annoying music, and the layout. The layout especially.

Overall Score: 33/80. Wow. That's a 41%. I'm so, so very sorry. I recalculated and recalculated, but that's what I got. I was amazed, actually. Keep working on your site, however, and maybe you'll rise to the top! You just have to put a lot of time and effort. If you're going to have a site, you can't just throw it together and hope to get an amazing score! You have to take the time to make it look good before hoping that you'll get a good score! But I know you can make your site work - you just have to put some time into it. If you want, I'll re-review your site in 2 or more weeks - plenty of time for you to get it up and running properly!


Back to Top

Rainbow Tears

First Glance: 8/10. The top picture is amazing, but the background/rest of the layout doesn't match the picture, which is a little sad. The picture itself is absolutely amazing!

Spelling/Grammar: 7/10. You mispelled the word "them" on your "Wall of Shame" part, and you used a horrible, horrible chatspeak term, "kthx". I really dislike it when people use chatspeak on their pages. Underneath "Awesome friends", You should have put "She and I were like sworn enemies" instead of "Me and her were..." because that is bad grammar. I am very picky about stuff like this, believe me. Also, {and I'm not taking off any points for this particular thing}, but you seem to enjoy using exclamation points. That's fine, but if you use three or four after the end of nearly every sentence, it gets a little annoying.

Neatness: 8/10. It looks like everything is well organized, but the strikes through the titles look a little...awkward....and you also have a lot of sections with the annoying "COMING SOON!!!" sign on them. If you don't have the sections up yet, don't put them up on the page. Otherwise, people might be dissapointed when they see that you don't have something on their page that they might want. Also, it took me about two or three minutes to find your link-back button. It was jammed in the middle of the "Layouts" section and the "Banners and Blends" section. Why not put it at the top of your sidebar? That way, people will be able to actually see the button, and they will be able to find it + use it!

Colors: 7/10. I believe I mentioned this before: You have an absolutely amazing welcome banner at the top, but then you go and ruin your page by putting a non-matching background on it. Why not try making the background black, so as to match the banner? Or maybe eyedrop the colored dewdrops on the banner and use them to make the background, because right now the background doesn't match the banner at all.

Music: 10/10. Good job. On your application to be reviewed, you say "Not yet." I strongly recommend against any music on your site, unless it's a simple song, with no lyrics. I've taken a poll on the help board, and most of the people {about 9/10} said that they disliked music on petpages, simply because they may be listening to music of their own, and they don't like it when other people's music blends with theirs. Personally, when I come to a webpage with music on it, and I don't know it has music on it, I normally close out the page immediantly. Sometimes I don't go back. It all depends on what peoples' tastes in music are, and if you put something on your page that most of the people don't like, you're not going to get a lot of takers for your graphics. Just a warning.

Age of Site: 6/10. I don't know how long you've been open, or how long you've had your counter for, but you don't have that many icons, and your cursors {which, for some reason, are linked by a button that says "Layouts"} are cute, but they're premade images as well. Either add somewhere on your site how long you've been open and how long your counter has been up, or most people will be confused. I know I normally am when I go to people's sites and don't see any of that information!

Quality: 4/10. I'm going to be honest here: all of your icons follow the exact same format: the credit in HUGE letters in the upper-left corner, and the name of the person blinking across the bottom. That's not very original; not original at all. Spice it up! Throw in some variety! Make something original! Although I must admit, your "shreds", as you call them, are extremely cute. Make more! The one that you currently have is quite cute! And, you only have one banner, and you have the cursors linked by a button that says "Layouts". Also, you have a lot of those annoying "COMING SOON!!!" buttons posted between your graphics. That annoys me to no end. If you don't have the graphic there, make sure that you MAKE it before MAKING a section for it! Also, you don't use any of your "Site Key!" things in your actual page, so how do I know whether the stuff was made by Alyssa, Berii, or was ripped from photobucket? You might also want to update your "Staff" section as well.

Updated List: 0/10. I see no updates whatsoever. When did you start the site? When did you add new information? When are you going to update your Staff section? If you don't have an "Updates" section, I can't give you any points at all for this section, even though it pains me incredibly to do it. And you were doing so well, too!

Other Problems: Well, besides you not updating your site AT ALL {from what I can see}, I don't see any of your "Made by ___" "From Photobucket" "Updated!" "New!" tags anywhere on your site. Unless, of course, you haven't updated since you created it! Also, you seem to be missing a staff member in your "Staff" list. There's also the problem of the cursor page being linked by the "Layout" button, and the button being in the "Layout" section, even though it leads to a cursor page.

Another thing that annoys me to no end is the use of the # V I S I T O R thing. Yours says "guest was totally thinking about stealing my graphics! Right after they JUST read the rules and promised not to! lol just kidding! But seriously DON'T steal these." AAAAH! These things are the bane of my existance. I extremely dislike things like this on petpages, because sometimes I can't tell whether the person is kidding or not. I would suggest taking that off. Oh, and all of the blank sections {a.k.a. COMING SOON!}. Those are annoying as well.

Overall Score: 50/80. That's a 63%. Now, don't get discouraged, and whatever you do, DON'T FLAME ME. Or you'll be put on the Wall of Shame along with hamiebabe from Signature requests. Your site has a lot of potiential; you just haven't tapped into it yet. Along with the most unique name I've seen in a while, you have a nice layout, which you can work to your benefit, instead of your downfall. Keep working on your site, improving it, and maybe you can rise all the way to the top! Just keep working on it, and I know that you'll have an awesome site one day!


Back to Top

Signature Requests

First Glance: 6/10. It's a teeny-tiny blendy-thing at the top, with the layout itself stretched far past the end of the blend. And the background color doesn't exactly match that of the blend; it's a little off. I'm a reviewer - if you don't want me to review your site, don't read on.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see any, although your font is quite small, and you have a lot of it, which makes my eyes hurt - especially when I'm reviewing sites near bedtime. But don't worry - I NEVER make a mistake in my ratings!

Neatness: 7/10. Your layout is all stretched and funny, and there's no in-site navigation whatsoever. You might try adding that.

Colors: 9/10. Like I said before, your layout's background doesn't really match your blended picture at the top. It's a slightly different green. Trust me, even the slightest difference makes a difference!

Music: 10/10. No music. Good job.

Age of Site: 6/10. It looks like you've been opened for a little while, but there's really no updates. If I'm to go by your first update, July 27, you didn't update again until a week or so later. And you say when your counter's started, but you don't say when your site's started! What's wrong with you? Those are IMPORTANT dates!!

Quality: 8/10. Some of them are a little pixelly {{JB Guild Layout, I believe}} and some of them are weird. Like that smoothie-featuring one? I don't really see the words on that one. *shrugs* But that's just me.

Updated List: 2/10. Your site has been open for a while, yet you have around.....5 updates. Add more. Keep them all. If you delete them, that's bad. Scroll down to the "Siddey's String" review, and there will be two scrollboxes there. Read the instructions to set up a scrolling box for your updates!

Other Problems: I have a few other problems. First of all, the layout. It's stretched, and I don't think it should be stretched. You said use IE, so I'm using IE, and I don't think I want to switch over to FF tonight, considering that you said that you think they're the same. That's why I'm reviewing in IE.

Umm...and I was a little put off by your "We Do Not Make" list, because everything that you don't make is what I like {{well, except for Twilight}}. If I were you, I think I'd let loose on a few of those rules. Several people have come to my graphics site saying "Thanks for doing this for me. I really appreciate it!" which makes me think that they might have been turned away elsewhere. *shrugs*

Overall Score: 58/80. That's a 72%. Keep working on your site, and I'm sure you may be able to make it into something great. Keep going! And make sure you rethink your "We Do Not Do" list.


Back to Top

Futago GraphX

First Glance: 10/10. Wow - that was...a little...blinding x.x It's amazing what people can do when they actually work towards something, isn't it? Anyways, the blend {{if that's what it is}} is very amazing. Well, considering that I can't do blends at all, it's truly amazing! Great job!

Spelling/Grammar: 3/10. I spotted a LOT of mistakes. I wonder how you guys are doing in your English class in high school....considering that you ARE seniors! And grammatical errors - oh, those nasty grammatical errors! In your FAQ, I spotted several spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. Make sure that you check the page over before you publish it! I would suggest copying-and-pasting the entire TEXT part into a word document, and have spell check help you out there. But remember: Spell Check doesn't always work! That's what a dictionary is for! And your site's name - it irks me. GraphX. When people use "creative" spellings for the word G R A P H I C S, it makes me want to scream. I know that it is your site's name, and I have no say in what you name it, but I'm just telling you - the way people spell graphics sometimes ticks me off.

Neatness: 8/10. I was looking through your lookups, and noticed that they are all out of order! -.- I really dislike it when things aren't in order; it makes the entire page look messy! Why don't you arrange the lookups by series - you know, DN Angel stuff grouped together, FMA stuff grouped together, Vampire Knight grouped together, Nartuo...ect... Right now, it's hard to find the stuff that I would like when the lookups are just randomly splattered onto the page! Have some organization! You have it on your icon page, but not on your main page? That's a little upsetting. But other than that, it's a nicely organized site. Sort of. The scrolling marquee-updates get a little old. It's a little slow for me. Besides, I like to read at my own speed!

Colors: 9/10. Everything seems to go very well together....except for the FAQ section! It's blue and yellow, while the rest of the stuff around it is pink and yellow! Change the blue to pink, then it might match!

Music: 10/10. Your site is nice enough without the music, but I think it might do better with some! Of course, I like listening to music from random animes/video games, so it could just be my opinion....*sighs* I'm really bored right now, if you can't tell. That's why I decided to do your review today instead of doing my homework - I don't want to do math right now!

Age of Site: 10/10. You've been up for quite a while, and it seems as if you've gotten a LOT of hits since March - over ten thousand, to be exact. Which makes me swoon. I wish my graphics site would get that many hits! But, don't forget to put the date that the site opened somewhere! Either I'm just tired, or you don't have that I M P O R T A N T date on there!!

Quality: 10/10. No arguments here. I agreed with all of my personalities that this site has amazing graphics, although one thing ticks me off a little - you reuse some of the images from your lookups for your icons. Don't get me wrong; that's fine! They're pretty ^.^



Those are the ones that I really like - of course, the only manga I read is VK and FMA, so maybe that tells you something!

Updated List: 7/10. Like I mentioned before, your scrolling updates a little hard to read {{LOTS OF TEXT!}}, but the marquee also scrolls VERY slow. Why not simply put them into a scrollbox? If you scroll partway down my page, I've mentioned SCROLLBOXES to lots of other people. You'll find the code somewhere, if you don't know it already! Also, there are a lot of misspelled words in your updates - come on, Seniors! Pick it up! Pay attention in English Class!

Other Problems: Your spelling. It's atrocious! {{Sorry, but I'm a reviewer; I'm supposed to grade it how it is!}}. Use a spell-checker, or use a dictionary! Misspelled words really turn me off, as many people know. Also, try to fix the scrolling marquee updates box....a scrollbox would be MUCH better. Oh, and organize the lookups! That's a big thing! And the colors...the colors on the FAQ don't match the rest of the page. You should probably fix that.

Overall Score: 67/80. That's an 83%. Good job. Fix the spelling errors, and the other things that I noticed, and you might move up to an A!


Back to Top

AnimeIke

AnimeIke
First Glance: 9/10. It looks like it's a nice site, but I think it would work a lot better if the entire layout was in the middle of the page. You know, centered? It's just my opinion, but I think that the type of layout you have would work MUCH better if you had a centered layout!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I saw nothing, and I go over these pages with a microscope, so you know that I'm actually checking them! Great job ^.^

Neatness: 9/10. Like I said two sections ago, I think the page would look better if it were centered. But again, that's just my opinion! Also, make the scrollbars a slightly darker color. For a few minutes, I tried to scroll on the normal scrollbar - you know, the one all the way at the left side of the screen? Then I realized, Oh, wait. There are two other scrollbars!. So, that's either something to fix, or it's an example of my stupidity. I can't really figure out which one!

Colors: 10/10. Everything fits nicely together, and I really like the layout! Although, {{and I won't take any points off for this}} make the scrollbars darker!

Music: 9/10. It seems like a great song at first, and if I'm not mistaken, I believe it's in Japanese, isn't it? If it's not...then I can't understand the words! But I'm pretty sure it's in another language. The thing is, it gets a little repetitive after listening to it while trying to review it...*heh* But I must say, the song seems to go with the layout!

Age of Site: 7/10. Your counter seems to have been up since your site was started....*refresh* EEEEK! My site just appeared! *claps* Yaaay! *heh heh* I was randomly refreshing the page beause a few icons wouldn't show up, and low and behold, my button appeared! Yay! Also, since you took some of your icons off of photobucket, I had to take off a few points, because it's easy to copy-and-paste icons from photobucket. It literally takes a few seconds.

Quality: 5/10. I felt really bad giving you this score, but it's really the only one that I could give you! Sorry! Here's why:

You don't have that many icons made by you...only about...3/4 were made by you...1/4 seems to have been taken off of photobucket. If I were to go by more exact measure, I would say that 2.5/4 were made by you, and 1.5/4 were taken off of photobucket. I don't really like photobucket-attackers, but you gave credit and such.... And here are the photobucket ones I really like:

SSBB SSBB

But if you can make icons like the following, why do you need to take stuff from photobucket at all?:
Naruto Deathnote Ouran High School

I'm just wondering. Those icons are great! But you have a lot of stuff from photobucket, so that's why I had to give you the score I did. I'm sorry....

Updated List: 8/10. *sighs* You sort of struck a raw nerve. Please tell me you're keeping all of your updates, and you're not deleting them if a few of them get too long! Because that would be a shame. Updates should always be kept, no exceptions. And you don't have a lot of updates, so I'm guessing that you haven't worked on your site in a while...Well, you did update it today, I suppose, so....That's why I didn't take off a lot of points ^.^

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned before: photobucket'd icons, updates list, and....um...I don't really know the rest...Read the review again to find out! *heh* I have a bad memory....

Overall Score: 67/80. That's an 83%. Great job! Keep working on your site, improving it, and maybe, eventually, you can even take off a few of the photobucket icons, replacing them with icons that are even more amazing! Keep going! I know you can do it!


Back to Top

2 Starz Graphix

First Glance: 8/10. The main image is offcenter, which irks me, and it is also wider than your two-columned petpage. If the image were directly over the two columns, it wouldn't matter if it were centered or not, but since the image extends over the columns, that makes it look a little messy. And before I go any farther, I'm just going to say that I dislike it when people use the word "Graphix" instead of "Graphics". It's just one of my pet peeves.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. Like I said before, the "Graphix" instead of "Graphics" irks me. Extremely. But everything else on the page is spelled correctly. Except for "pics". Why not be grammatically correct and use the word "pictures" instead? Another one of my dislikes is when people are lazy and they don't feel like spelling words correctly. *sigh*

Neatness: 7/10. You don't have any navigation, which is extremely tiresome. I don't like having to scroll all the way through the page simply to get to something that I'd want to look at. Add a navigation bar. That should be number one on your "To-Do" list. Also, RESIZE THE PICTURE! I believe that I've mentioned this before. Having a picture extend past the last column is tacky, and makes for bad presentation. Also, some of your graphics are missing previews. The banners in particular.

Colors: 9/10. They seem to fit pretty well together, although I don't understand why you have a Candy Corn layout if your site's name is 2 Stars Graphix {{it pained me just to write that! *shudders*}}. Why don't you have a starry layout?

Music: 10/10. Good job acing this catagory. Most people do. No music. That's amazing. I personally find music distracting when I'm trying to browse a graphics page. Unless the music is something I really, really, REALLY like, then I normally close the page the second the music starts blaring. I don't like it when music that I dislike blares out my speakers. It's nerve wracking!

Age of Site: 8/10. You seem to have been up for a while, but no where on your site do you say which date the site was started, nor do you say when you started the counter, which makes me wonder when you really did start the site. Just a suggestion.

Quality: 8/10. Judging by the previews, most of your stuff looks pretty good, but I had to take a few points off because I didn't want to go and place each one of the banners somewhere, and then go back and delete them, then do another banner, then delete it, then do the next one...ect., and I also didn't want to copy the petpage layout and chunk it onto one of my petpages. I can't delete anything on my petpages, so I can't see what your petpage looks like. Your best bet: make previews!

Updated List: 3/10. You've struck another raw nerve. You have two updates. TWO. Where are all the rest of them? Did you only open the site two days ago? When did you open the site? How many updates have you had since then? When will you add more updates? Do you delete the updates you had to add new ones? That's an extremely bad idea. Always, always, ALWAYS keep your updates! How else are we to know when you add a new lookup, or banner, or icon, when you delete the updates??? Try putting them into a scrollbox. If you look through one of the previous reviews, I'm pretty sure you'll find the scrollbox code. Read the directions to put the scrollbox code into your updates section. That way, you can keep adding new updates at the top, while letting the old ones stay at the bottom. *takes a deep breath* Whew! I'm really on a tirade today! What's wrong with me?

Other Problems: What I mentioned before: No navigation, the missing-in-action updates, the non-previewable graphics, the over-sized main picture, no when-this-site-was-started date, no when-this-counter-was-started date, and...I think that's it. Fix these things!

Overall Score: 62/80. That would be a 75%. Your site has a lot of potiential; you just need to tap into it! Fix the numerous problems that I found, and maybe, maybe you could score higher next time! If you think this score is too low, you should be glad that I didn't mention my dislike of Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus, the Jonas Brothers, Camp Rock, or High School musical anywhere in the actual review.


Back to Top

Jemz's Petpages

Jemz's Premade and Custom Petpages
First Glance: 10/10. So...much...green! But it's a good sort of green. It's pretty. At least it's not so-neon-that-it-hurts-your-eyes green. That would be a bad thing. The layout also seems to be well laid-out, and it seems nice and neat. I like it ^.^

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I read through your entire page, and I found absolutely nothing. That's amazing! And I might even have to request a layout of my very own...this petpage could use some improvement! A picture of my lovely shoyru in her FFQ-Painted state {{pirate}}....*imagines* That would be amazing! It all depends on if I get around to filling out that form or not!

Neatness: 10/10. Like I said before, I went through your entire page. You page is nicely laid out. Everything is EASY to find, nothing's complicated, and it all looks simply AMAZING. Great job! You're certainly better at coding than I am! *dances*

Colors: 9/10. As I said on the "first glance" grading scale, there's a bit too much green. The lime Chia looks a tiny bit out of place, simply because it's a darker green than the rest of the page. But don't take my word for it! You have an amazing layout, and I love it!

Music: 10/10. You stated in your neomail No - I find it distracting, and I know many other people do too. You took the words straight out of my mouth. Now I have nothing to rant about in this grading scale!!! Eeeeek! So should I just ramble about nothing, or continue to the next section? Ramble...continue...ramble... continue. Let's proceed!

Age of Site: 10/10. I remember seeing you on the Neoboards one day {{also when I added you to my directory}} and I know it wasn't that long ago. September 1, to be exact. And you've already gotten over 1000 hits. That is simply amazing. Bravo.

Quality: 9/10. I looked at your premades {{dragging and dropping into the address bar}} and I found a few problems....

With the Illusen (Earthy) one, LINK 3 is a different...style...than the other links. It's a simple text link, while the others are block links. Have you noticed that? Have you fixed that? If so, you should update your preview!

With the Dice-A-Roo one, LINK 4 is a different style, just like LINK 3 with the Illusen one. Check it out!

And, of course, with the Electric one, LINK 4 is a different style, just like the previous problems that I mentioned. Be sure to look at them!!

Updated List: 9/10. Here's where it gets a bit icky. You have a scrolling updates box. That would be fine if the updates were short...but....They aren't that short. Why not replace the marquee with a scrollbox? You know the scrollbox code; you use it for the "main" section of your site. Just keep adding the new updates at the top of the scrollbox, and keep the old ones at the end. That way, people will be able to tell what you did ^.^

Other Problems: Only what I mentioned before, actually. The scrolling marquee, the mismatched link buttons, and the seemingly-out-of-place Lime Chia. But the chia's not really a problem; the marquee'd updates are. Try to fix those ^.^

Overall Score: 77/80. That's a 96%! Amazing job! Just fix the few problems that I found, and you'll be well on your way to a 100%! I absolutely love your premades!!


Back to Top

Faerie Compass

First Glance: 9/10. The black-and-white swirly background doesn't really go with the pink-and-white layout that you have. Why not get a white-and-pink swirly background instead? Otherwise, I absolutely LOVE the layout! It's adorable!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I saw one little thing, but it was probably an unknown mistake, so I didn't count off for it. Underneath "Introduction", in the second paragraph, you put "The purpose is to help neopians like yourself to find it is that they need in a more easy and faster way."

Do you see what I italicized there? "More easy" sounds awkward. Put "easier" instead of "more easy", and you'll fix that problem right away!

Neatness: 10/10. I have yet to see a directory so nicely laid out like yours! Everything matches, and it's amazing! It is certainly far superior to this one. I know, it's a little harsh, but look at it! It's also a little better than my directory, Midnight Secrets. It's very nicely laid out, and everything's easy to find on your directory! Great job!

Colors: 9/10. Like I said before, everything works together nicely except for the background. The black-and-white clashes with the white-and-pink layout. If you were to replace the on the background with white, and the white on the background with the pink from your layout, it would look fantastic! Or better yet, just leave the background snow white if you can't get the background changed. It would look good either way.

Music: 10/10. Another acing in a category! Music on a Directory would be out of place, unless it was something simple. But your page is very nice, and music could ruin it!

Age of Site: 10/10. Going solely by your counter, you've reached over 500 page views in under twenty days. That's absolutely amazing! Of course, I'm going by the assumption that you opened your site on August 23, of course. That's really the only fair way to judge it. And you have so many links! Keep going!

Quality: 10/10. Since your site isn't a graphics site, I couldn't judge it in the traditional sense, but in another way. All of your button links are clear and easy to read, and your layout is nice. If you made it all by yourself, that's an amazing feat as well, but whoever made the layout certainly knew what they were doing!

Updated List: 10/10. You have updated almost every single day since your site was started, and you talk about your site and stuff. Some other directories I've seen don't have any updates...Which reminds me, I should probably add an updates section on my own directory!

Other Problems: Just what I previously mentioned - the background. That's the biggest problem you have right now!

Overall Score: 78/80. That's a 97%. I should make an award for you! Hang on....
*hammering noises commence*

Done! *does a happy dance* First award for someone with a 97% for their page! This award qualifies anyone with a 97-98% rating to get an award. BUT! This award is ONLY for SnowStar. If anyone else takes it, I'll be sure to punish them!


Back to Top

Good and Broken Graphics

First Glance: 10/10. It's an extremely cute picture. The two characters in the lower-right corner really draw your eye, even though the rest of the page is blank. I like it! It's adorable!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I didn't see anything, although a few of the colors that you chose for the font is a little hard for me to read - I'm talking about the light green and the blue. Try making it a bit darker, perhaps?

Neatness: 9/10. Your page is very nicely laid out, but the reason I took points off is because, well, you don't have any previews for your layouts! It's very easy to take a full-paged screenshot of your layout {{as it's on your lookup}}, then upload it onto photobucket. After you're done with that, simple do this:



You replace the # symbol with a number. Using 300x300 preview pictures are nice. You simply place a note saying "Drag and Drop into the address bar to see full-sized preview", and you're good to go! If you already know this, I'm sorry! I simply assume that if you don't have something, you don't know how to do it...so....*shrugs*

Colors: 9/10. Everything works very nicely together, but the yellow in the main picture looks...a little bit out of place. I don't know how to explain it...it just looks funny.

Music: 10/10. It seems to work really nice with your page. It sounds a little like a blend of Japanese-meets-American-Pop music. I've never heard of the person who sings it, but it sounds nice. I like it!

Age of Site: 7/10. It looks as if you've been up for a while, but there's only one update, there's no counter, and there's no little box proclaiming that you've been up since *insert date here* or anything. Judging by the number of layouts, you've probably been up for a while, but there's really nothing extra-special about the page. Make a counter! Boingdragon {{google it}} has some really good counters.

Quality: 6/10. I really struggled with this one. You see, you have no preview-layouts for your layouts section, and that ticks me off a little, so I subtracted one point. But your link-back buttons are nicely done, so I didn't take off anything for that. However, you state on your page...."She runs the icon section of G&B", when there are no icons to be found! There are only layouts on your page. I haven't looked at them {{I might later, but for right now, I like the userlookup layout I have}}, but your layouts sound pretty, just to go by the description of them. Try getting more graphics!

Updated List: 8/10. This is my pet peeve. You only have one update. Is that just one update since you started the site, or is that one update since you've cleared your updates? Never, ever, EVER clear your updates! Put them in a scroll box! If you look at one of the reviews below, I've already explained the code for a scrollbox somewhere. I'm being lazy because I don't want to post it again! *heh heh*

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned before: the updates list, the icons that are MIA {{Missing In Action}}, and....the font colors. That's basically it.

Total Score: 69/80. That's an 86%. Good job at scoring so high on your first review! All you have to do is fix the few things that I mentioned before....

I was scrolling through your lookups when I saw a FullMetal Alchemist based one. I have to check that one out someday! I absolutely LOVE Edward Elric, and even though it says that it features Winry, I'll block her out {{because she must DIE}} and just focus on Ed ^.^ Also, if your username is Zelda, and your petpage seems to be named after Nayru, I suggest you make a few Zelda lookups. Of course, this is just a guess. I assumed that since you seem to like Zelda, you might...Ah, nevermind. I'm babbling again! Gaaahhhh!!


Back to Top

Siddey's String ReReview

First Glance: 8/10. Wow. Your site's a CSS help site {{mostly}} but it wouldn't hurt to have a picture or two at the top ^.^ It's a very nice, neat layout, however. I like it!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10. I looked at everything - nothing escapes my eagle eyes! - and didn't find a thing. Which is good, because if you had had a misspelling on a mostly-text site, well...I think that's self-explanatory.

Neatness: 9/10. Everything is well laid out, except you have one simple thing: you didn't put a (br) or (br)(br) Between your last affiliate and the "Note to Affiliates" thing. I'm picky about this sort of stuff!

Colors: 10/10. Everything fits nicely together, and there are no color clashes! Well, except for the awards {{particularly the Pink JubJub Award}}, but you can't help that. It's great that you got an award! Keep up the good work!

Music: 10/10. Another acing in a catagory! Congratulations!! Great job!

Age of Site: 10/10. You have a lot of stuff, and you've only been up for a little less than a month. Keep going, and I'm sure you can expand it even more!

Quality: 10/10. All of your CSS seems to be nice, neat, and simple. I tried one of your gallery layouts the other day, and was nearly blinded, though! Try putting "black" as the color instead of red. That hurt my eyes!

Updated List: 8/10. Having things scrolling up into a marquee isn't the neatest of things. Try putting the marquee into a scrollbox! That'll make things easy! {{But with the newest updates at the top of the scrollbox, of course!}}. Marquees are really for short, simple, sweet updates, not for a whole honking blob of text! *Honk!*

Of course, you may already know this....

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned before. The brightness of the gallery layout {{heh}} and the scrolling marquee updates.

Overall Score: 75/80. That's a 93%! Great job!! Keep working on your site, and improving it, and you can soar all the way to the top!!

{{as a side note, I noticed you were reviewed by Hey My Reviews!, so I decided to check it out. We both got 90%'s there...good job!}}


Back to Top

Faerilis's Graphics

First Glance: 3/10. I am going to be honest here. Well, as honest as someone with three personalities can be....It's a lot of text. Tiny text. Really tiny text. No pictures...no nothing. A lot of words. Words are boring. Isn't this a graphics site? If so, where are the graphics? Bring them up! Put some at the top of the page, as in a welcome banner! Be creative! Have fun!!!

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. My....eyes.... Wow. That was a loooot of text to go through. I got bored halfway through. You sort of ramble....and ramble...and ramble. Seriously. Rambling is fine during a play, but people tend to get bored with it very quickly. So please, don't ramble. You did have a few spelling mistakes, such as "lotta", "di'nit" and some other things. I don't know if these were on purpose or not, but.....it makes the page look unprofessional.

Neatness: 9/10. Some of the graphics aren't aligned properly. Proper alignment is necessary for the success of the page.....Wow. That probably sounded weird. Anyways, some of the images aren't above their specific , and in all honesty, the "Back to the Top" buttons look out of place....They are aligned to the side, while everything else is aligned to the middle. They just look out of place.

Colors: 9/10. It's a lot of pink/white/other pinks. It kind of makes you want to tear out your eyes. Or maybe that's just me. I don't really like pinks....*shrugs* But it's your site.

Music: 10/10. The first catagory you aced ^.^ Music on a graphics site is normally a no-no, but in your case, if you wanted to add a simple song, such as a classical music piece {{NO Hannah Montana songs!}} or something....I think that would match. As long as it won't blare out of the speakers. Have a warning banner if you put music on your page.

Age of Site: 8/10. You've been up since July 19, and you started the counter two days later. *nods head* That's good. I started mine about two weeks after I started my graphics site! But, anyways, you don't seem to have had a lot of hits. Try putting the link to your graphics site in your NeoSignature or something. I, for one, cannot resist clicking Siggy Links. It's a bit of a weakness! You'll get more hits in no time!

Quality: 7/10. This is one that I really struggled with. You have Hannah Montana graphics, which I hate, but I tried to not be biased and give you a bad score simply because of those graphics. But....I've seen a few of your graphics on other graphics sites that have been up longer than you have. Such as these:

Also, these icons look a little....distorted? Hard to see? How do I describe it....? Okay, they're a little "off". That's how I desribe everything.

Umm....that's it. I think. Well, um...Yeah. At least everything's from the same photobucket album. That'd be a shame if they weren't.

This column's getting longer and longer, but I just want you to know that even though I strongly dislike the subject of this blend, I can't say that it's an awful blend:

It features Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus, which I strongly dislike because I think she can't sing, but the blending quality is incredible. Good job.

Updated List: 1/10. You only keep three updates at a time. I absolutely hate it when people do that!! You should always, always, ALWAYS keep your updates! How else will people know what's been added to your site??!! But anyways, here are the codes for a scrollbox....To keep all your future updates in {{newest updates on to}}:

And that will allow you to keep all of your updates from now on ^.^ Isn't that great??!! You will no longer have to delete them! Deleting updates makes for confused reviewers, which in turn makes for angry review-ees. Keep. Your. Updates.

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned before. No welcome banner, lots of text, the weird-looking icons, the un-aligned icons and s, and the updates box. That's all.

Overall Score: 56/80. That's an 70%. Good job, for your first review. If you want, fix the problems that I mentioned above, and you can re-submit for a rereview in about two weeks. If you resubmit right away, I know that you didn't make any MAJOR changes to your site, and it might very well look like it did when I first reviewed it....So, in closing, be sure to fix the problems and continue making your site the best it can be!!


Back to Top

Soroptimist Directory

Note: It took me a while to get to your site because my page was badly messed up. Apparently, I cannot put the word on this page, and "but" and "it" next to each other. TNT sees them as a combination of "bad words". As long as I don't use them in the coding, it's fine. Now, on to the review!!

First Glance: 8/10. Honestly, you have an itty-bitty banner up at the top of the page. I would suggest getting a bigger banner. But it's a nice, neat, simple petpage layout. I really, really like it ^.^

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10. You have a few grammatical mistakes now and then, and you have a few mispellings, such as "ya". That would be fine on the Neoboards, but this is a professional directory, and should be treated as such.

Neatness: 8/10. You have a few buttons that I think are "misplaced". The Links section seems to be out of place....I think it should be up in the Guides section of your page. And in some of the sections, the buttons have a (br) between them, and in others, they are just neatly placed in rows. I prefer the row-ed ones. Try making all of them like that. Of course, if the button isn't an 88x31 {{you really should make that an absolute requirement so your site doesn't end up looking like This one. That would be an utter tragedy!! If they don't have an 88x31 button, you can either refer them to Me or you can offer to make them one. 88x31 buttons are professional looking!

Colors: 10/10. They all seem to go very well together. That's absolutely fantastic! Or as you like to say... "fantabulous"!

Music: 10/10. Music is a no-no on directory pages! Great job keeping your music-free!

Age of Site: 10/10. You only got the site up a few days ago, but you seem to be doing really well! You have already recruited LOTS people to be on your site {{I'll add your button...eventually!}} and it's a very well organized site! Amazing!

Quality: 9/10. Like I mentioned before, Make sure all the buttons are the same size!!. This is the biggest problem I see on Directories nowadays {{if they use buttons}}. They are all haphazardly strewn about. {{Example}} That's a really big no-no! Make sure all the buttons are the same size. Refer people to a graphics maker, or offer to make them an 88x31 button yourself! I like the one you made me ^.^

Updated List: 10/10. You have updated every day since you made the site, and you really go into detail. You even have it in a scroll box! That's great!! Keep up the good work!!

Other Problems: I've said it before and I'll say it again....Make sure all the buttons are the same size! Offer to make buttons for them if they don't have an 88x31 button, or ask that they make one. The only way a button-based directory will succeed is if all the buttons are the exact same size. Make sure that you do this!! {{I'll continue with this until you do it...*heehee*}}

Overall Score: 74/80. That is a 92%. Very good! That's a great score, considering that this is only your first review! Keep up the good work and work on improving your site!! I'm hoping to see more of it in the future!!


Back to Top

Tips 4 Success

First Glance: 4/10. Honestly, the background doesn't fit very well with the two images you have; the Turmac one and the Illusen one. Why do you have two banners anyways? Pick one and stick with it...I guess. Um....what else? Oh, a lot of text. Text makes me dizzy. That's a loooot of text!

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10 My eyes... Anyways, I didn't see anything. I read about half your page {{I would have died if I read the rest of it}} and there were no spelling mistakes good job. Except there were a few times you used "i" instead of "I". But I didn't take off that many points for it....

Neatness: 10/10. I looked at the page in FireFox, after going through the entire thing in Internet Explorer, and I found all of my mistakes. *shrugs* Your site looks fantastic in FireFox. Good job!

Colors: 9/10 Some of them don't match very well. The blue patterned background with the brown and green banner at the top? Not working very good for me.

Music: 10/10 No music. That's a good thing. People don't like to be bothered with music while searching for tips to help them in Neopia. Good Job!

Age of Site: 7/10 It seems as if you've been open for a while, but you have no counter {{Good way to remedy this: google Boingdragon Counters. Those are the only counters I know of that will work with Neopets}}, and your updates box is kind of small. *shrugs* But that's just me.

Quality: 9/10. This was a very hard catagory to rate, honestly. Your site isn't a graphics site, so I can't rate it how I normally would, but I have to figure out how to rate it fairly. The really big thing that stood out to me is that you don't have a way to explain how to make s. You just say, and I quote, Tip #6: It's always good to provide a code for your link button or whatever because then it makes it much easier for people to just grab it and go. Now, if I were a first time visitor and a newbie to HTML, I wouldn't know how to make a . If you would want, I can make you a simple graphic from my Graphics Site that can show how to make the without actually creating it on the page. It's not that hard.

Also, underneath the "Pages" section, you talk about counters. You may want to give them a hint to go to Boingdragon, which is the best place for counters that I know of. At least, I think so. It's really up to you.

Updated List: 9/10. You seem to update frequently, and your updates are very long. The reason I gave you a 9 is because you don't see the updates when you first open up the page. They're tucked away in the left sidebar. Move them up a little. Actually, a lot. All the way to the top of the left sidebar. That's the best place for them to be. Also, get a counter, instead of relying on the Neopets' counter. That's actually not very accurate. I've had people say that 100 hits {{by TNT's counter}} is actually only 10 hits. That discouraged me, but they are the facts of life. Try getting a counter from Boingdragon, and saying the date that you started it.

Other Problems: Basically what I've mentioned before...:
1. Put your updates box at the top of the left column.
2. Get a counter for your page. This makes the hit number more accurate.
3. And, just a suggestion, you should add more links underneath each section. Browse through my affiliates {{if you wish}} on my Graphics Page and see if there are any "helpful links" there that you can add underneath any of your tips.

Overall Score: 67/80. That's an 83%. Great job! You did really well! I struggled with my scoring of your site, but you did a fantastic job overall. There are just a few little quirks that you have to work out with it. Overall, though, it's an awesome site, and I'm proud to have reviewed it. Keep up the good work! And it looks messed up in internet explorer, so you should probably put a sign somewhere that says "Looks best in Mozilla FireFox".


Back to Top

Kandy Crush Graphics

First Glance: 9/10 The picture is pretty good, but all of it is really all sort of random {{yet yummy!}} candies. They all kind of clash, but I can't argue with the chocolate one, so I'll leave it at that. But the real question is....did you make them? I know that you have....5 staff members, so that's a good thing. Maybe you all collaberated. *shrugs*

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 None of my multiple personalities saw anything. And you explained in your "blog" thing that you can't do capital letters....so that's why you get all the points for this. ^.^ But maybe you should try to figure out what code is blocking the capitals and fix it. That's just my opinion. I know it's the style of petpage, so I'll shut up now.

Neatness: 8/10 Well, if I were a first time visitor to this site {{which I am}} I would want to know who the graphics makers were, and the "Taxi" to be above the graphics. That's just my opinion. Oh, and your layout looks weird. The left color-bar is all the way to the left, but the right one is sort of inbetween the middle and the right-side. That just looks off to me.

Colors: 9/10 Everything is nicely laid out, and none of the colors clash that badly. But for the scrollbars, don't make them transparent. Make sure that you have some sort of scrollbar on there so that people can see where they are. It's confusing if you can't see how long the page is...

Music: 8/10 Personally, I don't really care for the music. It's not my style. I prefer listening to soundtracks of my video games. But since you told me that you had music, I reluctantly turned off iTunes to listen to yours. It doesn't actually match the mood of your petpage, if you get what I mean. And you should probably have some kind of warning. Sometimes people don't like being blasted out of their chairs by random songs. I know that I don't.

Age of Site: 8/10 Well, if I were to go only by the counter on your page, you've been up since August 10, 2008. I would put, above the counter, the date that you started the site. Unless you started the site on the same day as the counter, of course!

Quality: 0/10 You didn't make any of them. After I had already rated your site, you replied and said that you got all of them "off of photobucket or Iconator", which means I'll have to take 9 points off your final score, because you got a 9 in this catagory as well. Either way, I still like these {{but did you know that since you aren't giving credit to people, these are ALL STOLEN GRAPHICS? You have to ask people before you use their graphics.}}:

Updated List: 7/10 I only saw two updates, and one of them didn't have a date!! Just saying what new things you put on there. That's a bad habit! Make sure to always put a date on your updates! That's why they're called updates!

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned previously. The bars on the side, the stolen graphics, and {{almost}} the music. Some people don't like music on graphics sites.

Overall Score: 61/80. That's an 73%. I suggest that you learn how to actually make graphics before putting up a graphics site. Everything is in order except for the graphics.


Back to Top

Twiztid Shrooms: A Shroomy Guide

Twiztid Shrooms
This looks like it's going to be fun...
First Glance: 9/10 The mushroom is great! Although the rest of it is just text. You should put some more mushroom pictures at the top!!! Mushroom, mushroom!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 I saw nothing. That's amazing. You have a lot of text, and it took me a long time to go through, but I didn't find anything. Congratulations!

Neatness: 10/10 Everything is nicely laid out, you have pictures of every single mushroom, and nothing is wonky. Good job! This must have taken you an extremely long time.

Colours: 10/10 The background goes great with the layout. Shroomy shrooms!! Everything looks great together as well. The purple background combined with the shroomy black background is awesome. I love it!!

Music: 10/10 We {{my multiple personalities and I}} would have been a little confused if there was music here. Music on a shroomy page would be fine is the music is mushroom-y, but I don't know of any mushroom-y music out there, so you aced this catagory.

Age of Site: 10/10 You have been open for a very long time, and I finally found your counter all the way at the bottom (helpful hint: put the counter at the top so people can see how many hits you've gotten!) Good job. You've obviously done your research. It must have taken a long time to track down all the shrooms!

Quality: 10/10 There is no fuzziness, and although a few of your affiliates' buttons were those weird 'x'-ed out ones, I didn't take off because you can't help that. The pictures are great!

Updated List: 10/10 I see that you keep all of your old updates. I should do that for my graphics site. That might help a lot if I did. And would keep people from murdering me on their reviews.

Other Problems: None that I saw. Well, except for the fact that some of the mushrooms don't have prices, but I'm assuming that that's because they're very hard to find.

Overall Score: 79/80 Another 99%! Wow! I'm absolutely stunned! You had a great directory, and I haven't seen any other sites that have copied a shroom guide or anything even remotely related to mushrooms. You are amazing! Keep up the good work!!

Award: This award is only for the owner of Twiztied Shrooms. If you take this award without my permission, you will be punished. Severely. Anyways, enjoy, Oxide.


Back to Top

Siddey's String

First Glance: 9/10 It's a little better than what you had before...... it's a little stretched and weird. I like the picture, but I think your old layout was a little easier to understand and look at.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10 I didn't see a lot, but there are a few things that you could fix. I suggest go back over it and look carefully.

Neatness: 6/10 It's not all that neat. The boxes are waaaaay off of the place that they are supposed to be. That's not good at all. Fix it.

Colours: 8/10 It's pretty good but they don't really match the layout of your site.

Music: 10/10 You don't have any music, which is great. Who can concentrate when they're looking at a confusing CSS site and listening to music? Besides the wonderful and magical Kefka!!.... ... Err...sorry about that. I'm a little off the wire today. -.-

Age of Site: 6/10 There's no counter, and there's no way that I can know when you set up your site. Your homepage says "one week old", but I don't know how old one week it.

Quality: 7/10 I haven't used your CSS, but by looking at your previous site layout, they seemed to be amazing. But now your site layout isn't very good, it's confusing, and some of your glitters are a little "off". I don't know exactly how to explain it.

Updated List: 8/10 You seem to update frequently, but you only have two updates on your list. Hrm. That's interesting....

Other Problems: What I mentioned before: the layout, the glitters, and the other stuff. I can't go over it all. Reread the review to find out what I didn't like.

Overall Score: 63/80. That's a 78%. A C+. Wow. This is the very first site that I re-reviewed, and I am dissapointed to learn that the rereview scored lower than it did before. That's not good at all. But your site seems to be very good, I just don't really like the layout. If you can fix everything that's wrong with the layout, maybe it'll look better and get a better review. Honestly, it's not very good right now. Your old layout looked great; I was surprised to find that you changed it.

Anyways, fix the problems and I'll check it out again. In two weeks. If you want me to. Ciao!


Back to Top

Disney Animations and More

First Glance: 10/10 That's a very pretty picture at the top. The Sleeping Beauty picture stands out a bit though. Otherwise, it's very, very, good. If you made it, that's outstanding!

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 It's amazing. I went over your site especially well. I like keeping tabs on my affies. I saw absolutely nothing. Great job!

Neatness: 10/10 Everything is well laid out, and you have an easy-to-find navigation bar. You have both Disney and Non-Disney animations. Everything is great!

Colours: 10/10 Everything matches. And I mean everything. The background's a little odd, but the background matches, so I won't take any points off.

Music: 9/10 It's nice, but actually, it doesn't really match out with the site. Unless it's from a Disney movie I haven't seen yet....Which is very well could be. There are about ten or eleven I haven't seen yet. But I've seen all the classics, and most of the new ones!

Age of Site: 10/10 If that counter's to be believed...that's absolutely amazing! Over 6000 hits in about four months! That's incredible! And of course, the number of animations is stunning! But I still have to know...Did you start the counter on the day you started the site or a little while afterwards?

Quality: 10/10 Everything is absolutely AMAZING. And I repeat, amazing!!!! I love it! Every single image works, and everything is lovely! Sure, a few are from movies I haven't seen yet, but that's no reason to count off. Everything is perfect!!

Updated List: 10/10 You are the first site I've seen that includes the animations that you added on the day that you updated! Did that make sense? I hope it did, because that's the only way I know how to explain it.

Other Problems: Absolutely not! Well, except add more animations! Yours are amazing. I would LOVE to see more. MORE!!!

Overall Score: 79/80 99% You have the absolute highest rating so far. And after arguing with my mulitple personalities, I have decided to figure out some way to make awards for people. They have to be good, though. Better than my graphics. Anyways, I'll neomail you when I have completed it. Unless, of course, I get in the way of myself. Because the angry one didn't want me to waste my time. But I'll do it!!

Award: After arguing and nearly throwing myself off my roof, I've completed your award. It took a while. I was totally for it. But I was totally against that, and I understood both of their arguements. But anyways...Oh, and if you're not Interl, and you take this award.........Punishment like you'd never believe awaits you. And your friends.


Back to Top

Siddey's Changeable CSS

First Glance: 7/10 It's all words. I know that the site is a CSS site, but that doesn't mean it has to be boring! Spice it up a little with some random pictures! You have colour, so that's good. Just get some pictures! Or make some yourself. With MS Paint. Or request one from a graphics site.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 I saw absolutely nothing. And that's good, considering that most of your page is text. Yay. You aced the catagory. Talking to myself: Where's my usual enthusiasm?

Neatness: 10/10 Everything is easy to find, and nothing's hidden behind anything. Although, if the page gets longer, you'll have to add a navigation bar. I like navigation bars. And since you own a CSS site, the bar should be pretty!

Colours: 6/10 Honestly. I know it might hurt. It's really just a bunch of blue and orange. They are complimentary colours, so they look good together, but let's be honest. It's a CSS site. You should know how to make backgrounds! Or at least try to. Heh. And spice it up a little! I know you can do more!

Music: 10/10 There's no music. And there shouldn't be. Who wants to listen to music while trying to learn CSS? I mean, it's hard enough without listening to music, don't you think? Don't answer that.

Age of Site: 8/10 You seem to be doing quite well, considering you put up the site about a week ago. You should get a counter. Counters are fun. Talking to myself: I should get a counter for this site as well...

Quality: 10/10 I haven't used your codes, but telling by the way you set up your petpage and your lookup, they're obviously very good.

Updated List: 9/10 I can see your updates reaaaaaaly well. That's great! But you should probably update more. You've only updated once (that I can see) since your page was started. Why not get a blog as well? Or not. It's your choice. I'm starting to talk to myself again....oh crud.

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned earlier. Seriously. That's all.

Overall Score: 70/80 An 87%. Good job ^.^ I wasn't an 87% when I got my first review. I was a 75. And that was only because the person who reviewed my site didn't like gray. Or video games. Which really isn't fair. And I'm talking to myself again...


Back to Top

Nyponte's Adoptables

First Glance: 10/10 The top "banner" is very, very cute. I like it. Extremely cute. Adorable. Amazing. You get the picture. Moving on...

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 I didn't see anything. I went over it with a microscope.....Well, not really. But I didn't see anything. At all. Yaaaay! ^.^

Neatness: 10/10 Everything is neatly laid out and is easy to find. But, if you ever put anything more on there, make sure that you have them in seperate scroll boxes. Scrolling through Gelerts to get to Acaras isn't very....appealing to me. Heh.

Colours: 9/10 There's a lot of blue. But at least the adoptables are another colour other than blue! It's a pretty blue. Pretty pretty!

Music: 8/10 You're the first page I've come across that has music on it. Hm. Well, while it's very...tinkly, and it comes from Pokemon, it doesn't exactly match the feel of your page. And it gets repetitive after a while. Thanks to you, I'll have it stuck in my head all night. Whoop-de-doo.

Age of Site: 7/10 You should have an updates section, and put the date that you founded the site, as well as the date that you put up the counter. It doesn't look like you've been open too long, though, considering the number of hits you've gotten.

Quality: 10/10 I can only imagine how long it takes for you to draw something like this. For you people reading this review (I'm talking you YOU!, here's an example:

Isn't this simply amazing? It's great! I love it! But you should also try making some mini-adoptables as well. This one is quite big.

Updated List: Erm. 5/10. You said that the site is "unfinished", but I still have to take points away. Get some updates! Or at least an update section. That would be fine as well. Yayyyyyy!

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned previously. Oh, and you should have the "what's playing" somewhere at the top of the page ^.^

Overall Score: 69/80. Don't be sad! It's only an 86%! That's better than the score I got in my Algebra class last year! Be happy! Improve on the site! Have fun! Oh, and advertise. Advertising is good


Back to Top

Tina's Graphics and More

First Glance: 10/10 It's very colourful. It's amazing. I didn't take off any points, but you might think about centering the page. It's an awesome layout, and I think it would look even better if it were centered.

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 I didn't see any. And that's saying something. Most of my friends (and my mom, heehee) call me the Grammatical Freak. I don't mind. It's better than the stupid nickname the "others" have given me.

Neatness: 9/10 I had to scroll down through everything, and it's very neat. But to make it even neater and less messy (kind of), why not add a navigation bar?

Colours: 9/10 I did not see anything that looked out of place, but the weird yellow colour for the Neopets Navigation on the side doesn't really....fit in. Understand?

Music: 10/10 Wow. Everyone aces this catagory! Either no music or music that only I like (that most sane people have never heard of) are the only stuff that I like.

Age of Site: 10/10 Considering that you've only been open for about a month, you have a stunning amount of graphics. I would put the date that the counter was started above the counter, though, so people don't think that your site's only gotten 6 views in an entire month ^.^

Quality: 10/10 Oh gosh, where do I start? Everything look absolutely amazing, particularly these:

Banner by Tina(DarkenedSoul91)

and this one:

Banner by Tina(DarkenedSoul91)

Your graphics are stunning! And I particularly like this one:

Avatar By Tina(DarkenedSoul91)

I'm a Final Fantasy nut!

Updated List: 9/10 It looks as though you update a lot, but don't keep EVERYTHING in the marquee. Just keep up to like....5 or less in the marquee at a time, and then put more "extended" updates in a blog or something. You make blogs, you should have a blog!

Other Problems: Just get a navigation bar. That should be your main priority. And if you can manage it, try to center your entire layout. It just looks a little weird off to the side like that.

Overall Score: 77/80 An amazing 96%! That's nearly an A+! Good job!! You've gotten the highest score so far. That's great! Keep up the good work! I'm looking forward to seeing more from you!


Back to Top

Precious Dreams

First Glance: 9/10 I see a picture of Taylor Swift under "new stuff", and then I See that you've crossed out your "Gabby's Graphics" sign on your welcome banner. That's neat. I haven't seen anyone else do that. But you should probably work on creating a beautiful new banner that says "Precious Dreams" on it. ^.^

Spelling/Grammar: 10/10 I didn't see any. That's an amazing accomplishment, considering that I'm worse than the Grammar Police...

Neatness: 8/10 The layout is very nice, and you have a navigation bar and everything, so I can't complain about that. But sometimes I would try to scroll down through the page itself (without the nav. bar) and I began scrolling through the graphics. Try spacing out the columns a little. That should solve that problem! Also, for "Other Graphics", there's no header!

Colours: 8/10 Green! So much green! Try finding a good colour that goes GREAT with your new name!

Music: 10/10 Everyone aces this catagory! Music is always somewhat of an annoyance to me. Unless it's good music. Meaning stuff that I like. That most sane people have never heard of.

Age of Site: 10/10 For the number of graphics you have, you've obviously been open a long time. And you have a lot of page views as well.

Quality: 8/10 You can tell that some of the icons are made in MS Paint.

Normally, that would be a good thing that you made them in Paint, but these are a little....off-kilter? Is that how one says it?

Updated List: 10/10 Wow. You keep ALL of your updates on there! That's a good thing!! Yaaaaay!

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned previously.

Overall Score: 72/80 A 90%! That's very good. It's an A in my book. Or in most people's books -shifty eyes- Just fix what I mentioned previously and you could rise higher and higher on the scale!


Back to Top

Stormie Graphics

First Glance: 9/10 If that is a repeating background, it sort of covers up the Navigation Links. It is lovely.

Spelling/Grammar: 9/10 I saw a few misspelled words. You spelled "yes" wrong somewhere.

Neatness: 8/10 All of the graphics are aligned to the left. I think it would look a lot better if you would center everything. Also, try to get a navigation bar. That would be easier than everyone trolling through your graphics to find what they want.

Colours: 9/10 Most everything's colourful, but the background leaves a little to be desired.

Music: 10/10 There is nothing. Thankfully.

Age of Site: 8/10 It looks like you've been open for a while, but there's no counter or updates or anything. Try adding a marquee, or a counter. Boingdragon (google it) has good counters.

Quality: 4/10 Sorry, but most of the things that have images on them are extremely blurry (take the Jonas Brothers banner), and you didn't make half of what's on your page. The rest of them are stolen off of photobucket, which is bordering on Copyright infringment. I suggest that you get either GIMP or another graphics program and learn how to do the images yourself instead of taking them from other people. Unless you have their permission, you shouldn't redistribute. And if you use MS Paint, be sure to save all of your files as .pngs. That will keep them from getting blurry.

Updated: 2/10 Where's the update box? For all I know, you have abandoned the site from the first day you put the updates up. That's not good. Not good at all.

Other Problems: Just what I mentioned above. The graphic-stealing from photobucket and the update box. There's no update box!

Overall Score: 59/80 73%. C-. Fix the problems that I stated above and you could get an A or higher!


Back to Top


NEOPETS, characters, logos, names and all related indicia
are trademarks of Neopets, Inc., © 1999-2009.
® denotes Reg. US Pat. & TM Office. All rights reserved.

PRIVACY POLICY | Safety Tips | Contact Us | About Us | Press Kit
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions