Welcome

I'm movie138music, and this is my review site, Weewoo Reviews. It's hard work, but a lot of fun, too! To apply for either affiliates or review, use the form to the left.

To everyone who received an award: you can get the new, unblurrified version. Sorry for the blurrification of the old one.

Rules

I won't review about me pages, music codes, art, or screenies; you'll have to find someone else.
On-site pages only.
If your site has changed drastically, you can be re-reviewed in two weeks.
Put the word "feathers" somewhere in your review request. (Affies--you're okay.)
Please link back to me before, during, and after the review (I know this sounds strict, but we all love free publicity!).
Don't neomail me all the time asking me when your review will be finished. Every time you do that, you will be moved to the bottom.
Fill out a form, to your left.
No hate mail.

What I Look For

First Glance-10/10. This is important to the reader. Is your site messed up or clean and neat?
Layout-20/20. Is the site easy to navigate, and is it organized?
Content-30/30. This is the most important. Is there quality in your text? Is it well thought out?
Word Use-10/10. Did you use correct grammar and spelling? Was there chatspeak?
Links-5/5. Are the links broken? Are they easy to see and use?
Images-5/5. Do the images match the text? Are they blurry or ugly?
Originality-10/10. Self-explanatory. Is your site unique? Also, this will most likely be the place where I give my overall feelings on your site, since I don't have a section for that.
Decor-10/10. Are there necessities like counters, link back buttons, updates, credits, etc? Is your site on a wall of shame?
TOTAL: 100/100

NOTE: I review in FF.

Review Pick-Ups

Newest on the bottom.

House Fanatics Unite (closed)
First Glance: 10/10. I see a nice photo of the cast and a very cool theme.
Layout: 15/20. Did you make your layout? If so, great job. It looks like a case file with text that matches. The navigation is there. If you didn't make the layout, then I applaud whoever did. However, is it just IE, or is the scroll bar invisible? You may need to change that. Also, all that info squished together isn't easy on the eyes. Maybe you should put some of the bios on another page, such as your old /~Cherabi location.
Content:30/30. You used information that even a newbie could understand. For long-time fans, the tons of facts will enrich their knowledge.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. They were unbroken and nice-looking. You might want to change the main navigation (Account, Pet Central) hover effects, though. They stretch into the text.
Images: 5/5. The images are pristine and help readers identify cast members.
Originality: 10/10. I've never seen a fansite more devoted than House. With all the info, a close-knit group of members, and the hard work put in, it's one to rank among the best.
Decor: 9/10. You have all the necessities except affies. If you add other fansites to your list of places to click, you could get closer to other fans of House and such.
TOTAL: 93/100.
You earned an award!!! Scroll down to the bottom and collect it.

Rose's Daily Links (old layout)
First Glance: 10/10. I see a cute Kacheek picture, a neat skinny layout, and a tidy list of links. Great job.
Layout: 16/20. The layout itself is a premade, so no points for that. However, I like what you've done to it.
Content: 30/30. It takes hard work to compile a long list of dailies, yet you did that and more. Kudos to you.
Word Use: 9/10. Great, but the plural of "daily" is "dailies", not "dailys".
Links: 5/5. Again, the number of links is astonishing. That they all work is even better. They are visible, easy to use, and helpful. Very helpful.
Images: 3/5. There are few images. Maybe a banner would help. However, the images that are there are unbroken and fit well with the theme.
Originality: 10/10. Your dailies page is unique and very helpful to the Neopian community.
Decor: 9/10. A counter would help you determine how much you need to advertise. Otherwise, it's all good.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Makcool's Graphics (old layout)
First Glance: 6/10. The background is all right, but the red text is blinding, not to mention plain. Maybe the color could be toned down a little.
Layout: 15/20. A sidebar would help tremendously. Squeezing everything down to the bottom isn't good. The background, like I said, is good. I like the serious look of the page. However, all your text is in the same font, Papyrus, which is mostly a decoration font. It also doesn't fit too well with your theme.
Content: 27/30. The images are pretty and thoughtful, but the people who requested from you want a preview of what you made. Putting a small preview that can be viewed in full size when dragged to the toolbar is what many art sites do, and it is what I recommend.
Word Use: 9/10. In the Requests section, you spelled "Faerie" wrong in the second request.
Links: 3/5. They all work, but they are still plain blue and purple, making them hard to see, as well as boring. Plus, the links in your text boxes don't have the closing link tag.
Images: 5/5. They are beautiful. I like what you've done in your requests and Twilight pictures.
Originality: 10/10. There are too many Twilight art sites nowadays, but yours stands out among them. Great job.
Decor: 8/10. You are missing an update log! And again, add a sidebar.
TOTAL: 83/100.

Raven's Premade User Look-Ups (old layout)
First Glance: 10/10. The simplicity is great. I love the striped pattern that, incidentally, appears on the T-shirt I'm wearing right now.
Layout: 19/20. The banner matches, and the light colors are great. However, why is the text in the large scroll box floating around in the lower right corner? Maybe your coding had a mistake.
Content: 28/30. The lookups are beautiful. You could distinguish the difference between Type One and Two for those lazy folks who can't decide and add more styles, though.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 5/5. The main navigation hover effects are cool and the look is stylish. Same goes for your other links.
Images: 5/5. Again, the banner is great. The pictures in your lookups look like they were created for that purpose. Everything flows together, and there are many choices for even the most fickle Neopian.
Originality: 10/10. Your lookups are unique and all incorporate nature in a cool way, except for the AC and baby Lenny lookups, and they're awesome too.
Decor: 9/10. You have it all--credits, buttons, affiliates, and a nice counter, but you forgot the update log! Most people do, though, as you can tell by browsing through my past reviews.
TOTAL: 96/100.
Wow! Collect an award, dear Raven.

Twisted Dreams Reviews
First Glance: 10/10. The banner is fantastic, the color is mellow, and the overall style is very beautiful. The name of the site is nice, too.
Layout: 19/20. I can't believe you made your own layout.You don't see too much of that nowadays! As I said, the color is very mellow and it totally fits your theme. Nothing's out of order except the white space at the bottom. Blank space. Maybe you should take that out.
Content: 30/30. You're brutally honest with your reviewees, and I like that (although I'll probably get the same treatment in her review of Netiquette). Through this, you still have a deferential tone in your words.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. I would like to know where the main navigation (my account, etc) is. Perhaps I can't see it; contact me if you do have it on there. Otherwise, your table of contents is neat and beyond my HTML knowledge.
Images: 5/5. Again, great job with the banner! The awards you made are better than my one.
Originality: 10/10. With such a unique and cool theme and a homemade layout, people will remember your site forever and always.
Decor: 10/10. Counter. Affies. Updates. Reviews. Credits. You have it all, and you're setting a good example for those who don't.
TOTAL: 98/100.
Whoa! Highest review yet! Take your award.

Kiss of Beauty (old layout)
First Glance: 10/10. I like the gray, serious colors and the pretty banner that matches.
Layout: 18/20. The background is nice and the general look is wonderful, but you don't need the words "[Kiss of Beauty]" above your banner. You're saying your title twice. Plus you could use a little color. Gray is okay, but it looks like an old photograph.
Content: 30/30. I understand that this site is just getting off the ground, so I won't take points off for lack of content. What you do have is beautiful. I love the many layers and patterns.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 2/5. They all work and are visible, but there are so many! On your waiting list, why not just put the username with what they would like? There's no need for a link to their lookup. Same with completed requests. You don't need to link to the spot on the page where their graphics are.
Images: 5/5. Great graphics!
Originality: 10/10. Your site is new, but you have a wide range of talents! Requests will be pouring in soon.
Decor: 9/10. You have absolutely everything, but try for another button--one that doesn't blink so constantly.
TOTAL: 94/100.
Yay! Go get an award!

Final Destination Designs (old layout)
First Glance: 10/10. It's overwhelming. The movement, the images, everything. Don't know how you coded that, but good job.
Layout: 18/20. A while back, I complained to you on the Neoboards that I couldn't find the link to the lookups. It's still practically invisible. (For casual readers, the link is in the top right box.) Maybe the large picture in the middle could become a link.
Content: 29/30. The rules you have are simple and easy to follow. Your lookups are amazing, but none are Neo-related!
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 5/5. Again, that invisible link. Besides that, all the links are easy to see and useful.
Images: 5/5. Absolutely fantastic. As I said, I have no idea how you even coded the whole thing.
Originality: 10/10. You have it all covered. Nobody does lookups like you. Congrats on Neopia-wide fame.
Decor: 10/10. You had so much decor, it was all stuffed on another page.
TOTAL: 97/100.
Nice job. Get that award.

Acronym Guide
First Glance: 5/10. Your look? Boring. Obviously, you took a premade and didn't even try to play around with it. The title is vague and there's nothing to hold my attention. At least you have some color.
Layout: 11/20. Try to mess around with the background. Add a banner. Change the colors. The layout is generic.
Content: 27/30. Nice work. However, people are going to refer to /~chatspeakdictionary, above, rather than you. That page has a nice, handmade style, a theme, and more words. Adding more fun acronyms, like the DMBGPOP (Discarded Magical Blue Grundo Plushie of Prosperity), will help your viewer count. You are making good progress, though!
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 5/5. They work fine and are very visible!
Images: 3/5. The buttons and all are fine, but you lack any real images. Work on that.
Originality: 7/10. Your page is just another invisible dot on the face of all dictionaries. It's all right, but it seems like you spend more time collecting affiliates than adding acronyms to your page.
Decor: 9/10. You're doing fine. Affies, credits, link backs, reviews are all there. You just need an update log so visitors know you're still actively editing the page.
TOTAL: 77/100.

Fruitee
First Glance: 10/10. With a beach theme and pretty banner, you had me hooked from the very start. I love the banner, too.
Layout: 19/20. Looks like one of evileh's (Exclusive's) premades, yet so different. And that banner is a great way to add to the style. However, some of your scrollboxes are pushed to the left. Was that on purpose?
Content: 25/30. It seems a bit squished. Why don't you take another petpages, add the EXACT same layout, and put your directory there? Right now with it hiding on the bottom, it seems a bit neglected. Your overstuffed sidebar items could go there too.
Word Use: 8/10. In the table of contents, you spelled "SOTM" as "STOM." Lol. Plus in the intro, you said "reiews" instead of reviews.
Links: 5/5. Nice hover effects in the nav. The links are all neat, visible, and good-looking.
Images: 5/5. Pretty, and unbroken. The perfect combo.
Originality: 10/10. Your site has a bright and easygoing personality, one that no one can forget. It's got my virtual stamp of approval.
Decor: 10/10. You went above and beyond! (I know, I sound like your English teacher, don't I.) Everything on my little clipboard is checked off. Good job.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Inu-Graphics (old layout)
First Glance: 8/10. The colors are a bit bland and the banner is a little ugly. Otherwise, you're off to a good start.
Layout: 18/20. Everything is a bit default: the blue, the font, the background...The picture in your banner is nice, but an anime banner would match your theme more.
Content: 29/30. I love your art! The 'evil overlord of darkness' banner is the best. Try expanding your talents beyond icons and banners.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 3/5. You are in need of interesting links. The ones you have function, but they are boring and have no hover effects. Plus, some of your buttons don't have the closing link tag. /~YurbleBurble_26 is a great tutorial to help you with that.
Images: 5/5. Again, your art is wonderful, but the banner...I already discussed that, and I won't take off more points for it.
Originality: 9/10. Your anime work is pretty, and it's quite unique. You need to work on your layout and first impression, because those are extremely important.
Decor: 8/10. Good job on the updates. You need a counter and some of your buttons are ugly, but overall you're doing fine.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Cybunny Castle (closed, owner frozen)
First Glance: 9/10. I love the tidy look, but there are several contrasting colors. Figure out the theme color: pink, green, blue, or whatever. Of course, you could stick to your contrasting colors and just add more hues to the page.
Layout: 15/20. Is this a premade or an edited premade? You didn't specify in the Credits section. Either way, it looks very nice, although your sidebars seem cramped.
Content: 30/30. Vunderful. XD Your directory is full of bunnies and I can tell you work hard on it.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. They all work, but there seem to be...a lot. I don't think you need links to the sidebars. I do think you need to link to the different Cybunnies, unless there are less than five in a category.
Images: 5/5. Crystal clear, cute, and all-around awesome.
Originality: 10/10. Your page is, again, vunderful. It is unique and set apart from every other Cybunny directory out there in an upbeat, charismatic way.
Decor: 10/10. A nice counter, buttons, affies, and updates! Wow.
TOTAL: 93/100.
Go get an award!!

Indifference Reviews (old layout)
First Glance: 10/10. Great banner, neat look, and a colorful all-around impression. I definitely don't want to leave.
Layout: 16/20. Your header is in a too-bright aqua and the words inside are barely visible. Your banner background is awesome, but the words themselves are plain and unoriginal. Plus, you may want to add a scrollbar to your reviews, kind of like mine, to save space in the review area.
Content: 30/30. Your reviewing is brutally honest and you don't play favorites with anyone or beat around the bush. A future may be waiting for you in the form of journalism (yes, in real life).
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 5/5. They're pretty, have nice hover effects, and function correctly.
Images: 3/5. The banner is too plain, and some of your buttons are hard to read.
Originality: 8/10. Your site is wonderful, but you seem to be missing something that will echo in a reader's mind. You also seem to be collecting decoration (affies, buttons, etc.) more than reviews. Concentrate on the main thing.
Decor: 10/10. Wow! Everything here-and more.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Guide to Pet Adoptions (old layout)
First Glance: 8/10. The site is fairly nice, but too plain. No banner? No background? Your page could use some spicing up.
Layout: 10/20. You are in need of color. The orange and yellow theme is fine, but there's nothing cute or cool to support it. Plus, the font is too default. I can tell you've never heard of a scrollbar before either, to save space on your news and affie area.
Content: 30/30. Wonderful information. I'll come back every time I need help with pets.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. They all work and are visible, but you seem to be lacking the My Account, Pet Central navigation that is quite vital to a page.
Images: 3/5. Frankly, you are nearly imageless, spare the buttons and occasional screenie. The pictures you do have are nice, though.
Originality: 8/10. Your designing of other pages, such as your pea chia application, is fantastic. Why can't you apply that to this page? The content is nice, but there needs to be some meat around the bare structure.
Decor: 10/10. Nice work on this one.
TOTAL: 83/100.

Boom Blinkies (moved)
First Glance: 9/10. The title, the colors, the psychedelic hues totally pulled me in. I don't see a real theme here though. Is it bombs, blinkies, or '70s style? Clarify for me and your readers.
Layout: 17/20. The banner is too much and too little at the same time. The blinking BOOM hurts my eyes, but the banner itself is flat and plain. I suggest picnik[dot]com for maximum banner quality. Plus, your navigation is a little hard to find. Maybe make it more visible?
Content: 30/30. Great blinkies! You do a great job making them, and I think I may order one sometime soon. XD Keep up the good work.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. Nice hover effects. I don't see any Neopets navigation (my acc, etc) though. Point it out to me in case I missed it.
Images: 4/5. The cute blinkies definitely fit in this section, but unfortunately so does the ugly banner. Fix it pronto.
Originality: 10/10. Great blinkies! Neopia needs you to supply them with your wonderful graphics every time it starts a site.
Decor: 8/10. You have every piece of page decoration a good site needs. But I remember you asking my other site, Netiquette, to be affies, and at press time, I didn't see my button on your page. Nor was there any mention of this site in your review section. Fix that.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Asparagus Anonymous
First Glance: 10/10. The title, the theme, the banner, well...I LOL'd so hard my chair tipped over. You have a cool place going on.
Layout: 18/20. You edited an Exclusive layout, right? Or did you not edit it? Whatever the credits say, it looks great. Especially the animated banner. However the diagonal stripes are all too common. Maybe you could find a new background somewhere else.
Content: 30/30. Great asparagus theme! Although you seem to be just getting off the ground, AA is a fascinating and helpful place to be.
Word Use: 7/10. You made several mistakes in the intro.
Links: 3/5. You have almost no text links, and the ones you do have lack good hover effects. Shouldn't you link to important asparagus landmarks in Neopia?
Images: 5/5. Unbroken, pretty, and fitting. Nice!
Originality: 10/10. Full points! I mean, no one ever started an asparagus group yet, right? It's totally unique.
Decor: 10/10. Affies, counter, buttons, and everything else a good site needs. Congrats!
TOTAL: 93/100.
What's that I hear? An award?!?! Well, go get one!

Twilight Layouts (moved)
First Glance: 8/10. The banner is the first thing I see and it looks great. But can you explain why there is a letter 't' to the right of the banner that leads to TNT's press kit form? The two smileys that link to other pages...there are better places to put those too.
Layout: 17/20. Too many, too small scrollbars. The bright red is a bit unnerving. And without a Table of Contents, it takes me forever to navigate through all that color and find what I'm looking for.
Content: 29/30. Nice Twilight layouts. They're pretty cool, but they're Twilight layouts. Not exactly unique. There are so many other topics to put your graphic talents into!
Word Use: 8/10. You jabber on and on and don't stay to the point, plus the grammar and spelling in your run-on sentences aren't the best.
Links: 5/5. They all work and look wonderful. The text links in the sidebars might be a little big, but it's very stylish.
Images: 4/5. Your art is wonderful and cool, so don't worry about that. But your buttons are really ugly and only one is a standard size (around 88x31, which is what most people use).
Originality: 8/10. Twilight. Again. There is nothing here that sets this site apart from the hundreds of other Twilight graphics sites out there, not the generic title, nor the same red color I see too often in these types of pages.
Decor: 10/10. You got it all. Counters, affies, buttons and such. Good job.
TOTAL: 89/100.

CullenLove Twilight Graphics
First Glance: 10/10. Love the colors and the banner is nice. I'm staying, even though I don't really like Twilight.
Layout: 17/20. It's a bit much to scroll, don't you think? I would neaten it up a little. Plus you could make use of a LOT of scroll bars, like this one. Otherwise, the layout is nice. You didn't use a default red and the purple is a nice touch.
Content: 27/30. You seem to be having problems with links from Twilight Buttons to Pickups in the sidebar. Everything there links to itself! Fix that. Also, you don't show your pickups to your "customers", you only give them the text box with the coding. They want to see what they're getting. Plus all the link images have ugly borders around them that need straightening up.
Word Use: 9/10. You misspelled a few words, like inconvenience, and seem to lack some apostrophes.
Links: 5/5. Looking good!
Images: 5/5. Beautiful. Especially the banner. Your work is better than the tacky stuff I see on other pages.
Originality: 10/10. Twilight page AGAIN. (See previous review.) Like I said, though, your page deserves a thumbs-up for the great art and stands out among the many, many Cullen-themed pages in Neopia.
Decor: 10/10. Updates, counters, affiliates, link backs, all there. Yay!
TOTAL: 93/100.

Oasis Buttons
First Glance: 10/10. Nice theme and nice colors. The whole thing is really pleasing. A++.
Layout: 18/20. Your link back, directory listings, and reviews should be on the sidebar where everyone can reach it. And your "Past Buttons" section is merged with the Neopets copyright credits, at least on my computer. Otherwise, it's really beautiful, and you made it yourself!
Content: 30/30. Nice. Your buttons are pretty and helpful, plus they have cool borders. Maybe I should order one!
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes!
Links: 5/5. All working, all helpful, all neat. Good job.
Images: 3/5. The buttons are small, wonderful images, but the banner is large and plain. All you did was soften the image and add words in a default font. Maybe you could make the banner more interesting?
Originality: 10/10. Good job. Your site is making a name for itself and proving worthwhile to the average Neopian. Who knows? It could rise to the top one day.
Decor: 10/10. Yep, you've got everything.
TOTAL: 93/100.
An award! *gasp*

Cotton Island
First Glance: 10/10. Personally, I think beach themes are overused, but you make it seem new and natural. Same for the normally dull gray background. It's suddenly become hip.
Layout: 20/20. The sidebar fits in perfectly, and you don't seem to be needing a second one. Keep that in mind though; if you run out of space a sidebar to the right would be tremendous.
Content: 28/30. You fail to mention your username or link to it, and people don't know who you are in case they want to poke around on your lookup. Plus some of your text styles are unreadable.
Word Use: 9/10. Everything is good except for the second sentence in your intro, which is a fragment (incomplete).Yes, I know, I'm picky.
Links: 4/5. Nice hover effects on the sidebar, but you have almost no text links. And the only two links look just like your bold, so no one can really tell.
Images: 5/5. Great buttons! Your banner is awesome too. Keep up the good work!
Originality: 9/10. Even though you make an overused beach theme cool, the fact still remains that it is overused. Too many people go after the desert island look, and you are one of them.
Decor: 8/10. Your update log has no scrollbar and you have no affiliates. Keep working on those. Other than that, you're doing great! Some people don't even have the update log at all.
TOTAL: 93/100.
You got an award! Congratulations.

Final Destination Designs (re-review)
First Glance: 10/10. Wow, this place has CHANGED. I can no longer complain that the userlookup link is invisible, nor can I point out that the images are overly bright. The NEW FDD is stunning.
Layout: 20/20. Your coding is amazing. How did you sculpt those boxes into that image? Someday you'll have to open a tutorial for us folks who are still in generic sidebar petpages.
Content: 30/30. You have huge quantity and huge quality too; those are the materials for success. It took me FOREVER to scroll through all your fantastic lookies and petpages. Believe me, that's a compliment.
Word Use: 10/10. I don't have the energy to prowl through all your text, but I can conclude that you have spectacular grammar and spelling after seeing you on the boards. Good job on that.
Links: 5/5. Good hover effects, visibility, and tidiness. Need I say more? Images: 5/5. The donut boy (who is he?) is cute and your layouts--duh--are fantastic. Keep it up!
Originality: 10/10. As one of the most widely known premades, you can safely announce that you are the site to end all sites, without the whole Neopian community flaming your back. In fact, they may even applaud.
Decor: 10/10. Refer back to your last review: There was so much, you had to stuff it on another page. Don't nothing beat that.
TOTAL: 100/100.
You got a PERFECT score!!!! No wonder everyone likes you. Replace your old award from me with the new one, because this one looks better.

Comet
First Glance: 10/10. The first thing I see is the nice background and the animated banner. (Nice glitter!) I'm not leaving yet.
Layout: 18/20. Even with two sidebars, the page looks cramped. Maybe you should stop adding buttons to the sides. Otherwise, I really like it. The header is nice and the space theme is cool.
Content: 27/30. Only four reviews? Maybe you should advertise. And without a scrollbar surrounding all of them, they will take up too much space. Plus, you forgot to mention your username. Otherwise, it's fine. You are fair to your reviewees and they'll probably tell their friends.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. I can't see your 3rd link back, but the two I can see are unattractive. The makers of them are bad too. Your text links are good, though. Don't worry.
Images: 5/5. As I said, your banner is pretty. Your awards are too, although I like the 80+ award better.
Originality: 9/10. You're still too new to be overly unique, so you haven't gotten there yet, although the space theme will take you far. You need more reviews to step out of the shadows.
Decor: 9/10. Passed with flying colors, except for the update log. The newest news should be at the top. People are interested in the latest, not the oldest.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Fairest
First Glance: 8/10. I don't get a good vibe from your site. The banner is grainy and your scrollbars look awful. It's not too welcoming.
Layout: 17/20. Your background is just a solid color, and the whole right side of the screen is blank. You're off to a good start, though. It's nice that you made the code yourself, and the theme is fine.
Content: 28/30. No one has voted for any of your sites, so you need to advertise. The SOTM/review thing is confusing, and you apparently have never heard of centering images and scroll boxes. Also, a lot of your text turns purple when I roll over it. Was this intended?
Word Use: 7/10. Are you in cahoots with commas? That's what it looks like, because, you use them, way too often. Your text is confusing. Clarify your statements and rules so people know what you're talking about. Plus in your navigation, you spelled "entries" incorrectly twice.
Links: 5/5. They work, they're legible, and they're nice. Good work.
Images: 4/5. They are neat, but the one image that matters most, the banner, is bad quality. Keep working on it.
Originality: 10/10. I have to say, I've never seen a site quite like yours. It's very unique and, if you spread the word, may emerge as a celebrity.
Decor: 10/10. I already addressed the centering problem, so besides that you get an A+ in this region.
TOTAL: 89/100.

Pixel Cafe
First Glance: 10/10. Of course, I fell in love with the layout right away. What a cute little kitty! And the navigation is crystal clear.
Layout: 18/20. The Neopets copyright is floating around the left of the page and is really out of place. you need to change it. Plus, your link backs are hiding and it took me a while to find them so I could get started on the review. Maybe you should put them in the Affies section?
Content: 28/30. Awesome pixels! You obviously work very hard on your pixels, and 2 thumbs up for that. There might be a problem with the amount of numbers in the location, though...typing /~allie123456789581 over and over might frustrate potential affiliates. Also, what did you make yourself? Everything is credited to other people. Besides the pixels, did you do any of the coding?
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes!
Links: 5/5. Nice navigation (something I can't do, by the the way). Everything is neat and orderly.
Images: 4/5. Cute cat! Your buttons aren't very pretty, though.
Originality: 10/10. Your site is definitely to be ranked among the best of the best. Period. I mean, look at what you've done to the place! Two thumbs up, I say.
Decor: 9/10. Great job...except for the update log. You should save all your updates so people can see how far you've gone since the beginning.
TOTAL: 94/100.
You got an award! Pick it up down there.

Sun City Designs
First Glance: 6/10. Um...wow. The first thing I saw was a huge, weird banner, no background, and lines. It looks like you have no coding sense to show off, though the banner I do appreciate.
Layout: 16/20. There are a lot of problems here to address. Why aren't your columns centered? Why are there gray lines stretching from your headers? Why is the bottom content not in columns? Why have you had no layouts finished ever since the coding was deleted?...Phew. Peppering you with criticism takes energy. But fix the site, please.
Content: 15/30. Wow, you took a hit there. But it's true. There are actually no layouts on your layout site. I know, they've been deleted, but you could start taking requests again...Once you get those done, you could then begin work on your blog, about me, link backs, reviews, and such. (Plus, your *important news* move upward too quickly to be read. This is really minor, though.)
Word Use: 10/10. Nothing noticeable.
Links: 5/5. Nice buttons, though they don't have much to do with the site. Your links are good too (nice mouse effect!).
Images: 5/5. Pretty much the only image worth looking at is the banner, which rocks in a /strange/ way. Your other images, like the pixels, are cute too, but they aren't the main thing.
Originality: 9/10. Geh. You don't really stick out from other graphics sites like yours: few layouts, bad layout, and weirdness. Try advertising and fixing your coding mistakes.
Decor: 9/10. All good, except for your affies. They're a great way to spread the word, and a group of affiliates can help you with your HTML.
TOTAL: 75/100.

Taxi Reviews
First Glance: 10/10. The background is cute, the theme is cute, the layout is cute. So I deduce: cute!
Layout: 18/20. Your yellow is blinding when combined with the white links. And is that the Neopets copyright squashed into a corner? How did that happen? Your site is awesome, though, and I wouldn't give up on it.
Content: 29/30. Your style of reviewing is kinda like mine! I wonder about it, though. Isn't organization a synonym of neatness? Maybe you should replace one of those categories with something else.
Links: 3/5. The buttons and text links are good, except for the last two buttons. Ew. The other two are awesome though.
Images: 5/5. Yes, I am taxi insane. And the pictures of cabs are so very perfectly aligned, heh heh. Keep up the good work!
Originality: 10/10. I think I can safely say that your review site is different from all others, including mine; I mean, who has ever made a taxi-themed page at all before? *clap clap clap*
Decor: 10/10. What more can I say? You have everything on the list.
TOTAL: 95/100.
Yay! You got an award!

The Pixel Field
First Glance: 10/10. Sweet layout! I love the little bee in its hand-Painted glory. My monitor is definitely staying on this page.
Layout: 20/20. What did I just say?! LOL. Again, your layout is pretty, especially since you made it your own. The organization isn't too shabby either.
Content: 28/30. Hugely wonderful pixels--it's no wonder I'm singing your praises. However, your text links are very plain, and you have no Neopets navigation.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. Cute buttons, but remember what I said about the text links.
Images: 5/5. PIXELS!!!!!!!!!!!! Ahem. Anyway, they rock. Plus you have so many extensions on your talent, like a toy box, a club, and adoptables! Wow!
Originality: 10/10. Yes, you totally stand out like a weed in a meadow of marigolds. (Note: this is a compliment!) No one and nothing can stand up to all your work.
Decor: 10/10. You have it all. Need I say more?
TOTAL: 97/100.
Whoo! Scroll down and get your award.

Butterfly Graphics
First Glance: 10/10. When I entered this page, the colors really caught me off guard--and not in a bad way! Your banner is nice, too.
Layout: 10/10. The two column layout fits with the banner and you added the same pink shades to every part of the site. Good work on your alignment!
Content: 22/30. Your drawings are great compared to mine (heh heh), but some look mediocre from a critic's point of view. A few of your hand-drawns are blurry and ginormous as well; several banners look like they were made on PowerPoint and badly cropped. The text is default. (For a really cool image editing program, try Picnik[dot]com.) Now for the reviews. They are jammed at the bottom where no one can see, plus you aren't too good at them. You don't give a reason for your grades and there's no rubric. Maybe you should move or shut down this section.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes!
Links: 3/5. Most times, my reviewees have page navigation but not the My Acc, etc. Sadly, this time it's the other way around. It's great that you have site nav, but your page is big and it needs some links of it own. Otherwise, you're doing great here, with organized buttons and neat text links.
Images: 5/5. Since your image requests have already been discussed and enough points have been docked, the subject won't appear here. However, your banner will. It looks AH-mazing, as I said before!!
Originality: 10/10. Your page is unique. Even though I've seen two Butterfly Graphics pages, yours was better by a ton. So don't worry about not sticking out.
Decor: 8/10. You have everything...but a counter!! Get one at boingdragon[dot]com. Plus, you have so many buttons, it would only be fair to take a few of the bad ones off.
TOTAL: 88/100.

Sprinkles Inc.
First Glance: 10/10. An...interesting banner. But I liked it. Your background is eye-catching too. Your large amount of scrollbars (even on the front page!) show you have lots of information to give.
Layout: 20/20. Everything is meticulously organized, from everything to everything else--in scrollbars. Duh. The three tables are perfectly aligned, sometimes even overlapping. Two thumbs up!
Content: 30/30. I see your stuff all over the place, so it must be good. You have a wealth of talent all crammed into this one page. Keep up the good work, because so far you have 100%.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. Whaaat?! No Neo navigation again?! *sigh* Please add it, if it isn't there already. Otherwise, you're stellar in this category.
Images: 5/5. Sweet banner. How do you do that image rollover? And your requests aren't too bad either. Yay!
Originality: 10/10. You're different and cool. 'Nuff said.
Decor: 10/10. Passed with flying colors!!
TOTAL: 99/100.
You got an award!!!!!

Skoofii's Daily Scoop
First Glance: 10/10. The banner is a real eye-opener (especially at 7:00 AM NST! *YAWN*) and the colors are bright, but not too bright. At first glance, I know exactly what I'm looking for (dailies) is here.
Layout: 16/20. You did a fine job with blending the banner picture with the Neopian globe, but that poor Kacheek got stretched! The globe looks faded and the whole thing looks grainy. Plus, the information in the side column is cramped. Maybe you should add another one for only the extra links, and the first can be for link backs, affies, etc. This page is a great example of organization.
Content: 29/30. You have good information and you work to keep it updated--the signs of a true daily-maker. However there are so many links that there's a lot to scroll through. Perhaps you should put them in little rows.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 5/5. So many links, but they all work fine. And they're visible. YAY!
Images: 3/5. Ehh. The only image to be found is the banner, and I told you how weird it looks. Maybe have someone make one for you, or try again.
Originality: 9/10. You have the potential to be famous, like the spotlighted Neo___Zafara and Kissmoto. You could also slip down into the obscurity that other daily pages with troubles much worse than yours must face. So hurry up and decide which one you want already!!
Decor: 10/10. You've got everything.
TOTAL: 92/100.

Hawaiian Reviews
First Glance: 10/10. Great background! I love the Tokyo Mew Mew banner (never watched it, but I heard it was good). You blended the picture well. Your columns are neat and aligned, too. I'm staying!
Layout: 18/20. The columns, while tidy, are verrry thin on the sides. The text boxes are coming off! That is not a good sign. Your review boxes are not centered, either, and that gives an impression of uncleanliness. (Yeah, I talk like a college professor. Ya wanna make sumthin of it?)
Content: 28/30. In the introduction, you seem to be rambling...Your reviews are fair and just, but you've only finished three in an entire month! (Happy one-month anniversary!) If you've completed more than three, leave them up, as I was warned in my own early days. People tend to think you're wiser if you've made so many people happy.
Word Use: 8/10. You've misspelled some words, like total, and forgotten some punctuation on occasion. Fix?
Links: 5/5. They work fine, you can see them, but they look funny when hovered. It's really minor, though, so no points off.
Images: 5/5. Good work on the banner, and the awards are pretty too, though you didn't make them. Two thumbs up.
Originality: 10/10. Looking good! You have a great look and a style that fits the audience. This site'll be around for a while, that's for sure.
Decor: 9/10. Everything...except for a counter. Hmm. Add that.
TOTAL: 93/100.
I reviewed in Firefox. Ehh, you look okay in IE, but you're still rambling. The award is yours though!!!

The Goodie Box
First Glance: 10/10. The banner caught me off-guard, but the green look is nice. Your background--plain green--is nice.
Layout: 17/20. What's with the green banner? What is that stuff in the picture...Petals? Pads? Leaves? And why is there a huge space to the side of the columns? Plus all the pages are on separate pages. Is that necessary? My computer is just too sluggish to deal with that...
Content: 30/30. You do all that stuff and never mess up once. How can you make color palettes, buttons, banners, resources, lookups, backgrounds, bases, blogs, and more while never tarnishing your reputation? Amazing! And to think some of us (in other words, me) are still making layouts in obscurity.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes. Duh.
Links: 5/5. I don't love the line-through, but you have SO MANY links, it's not a huge problem anymore. And your buttons aren't too shabby either.
Images: 5/5. Every image in this entire place rocks, except for the banner, and I already discussed that.
Originality: 10/10. We all know the Goodie Box and use its toys--even I have your open/closed signs. You're famously famous without even trying!!! Looks like you passed the hardest-to-ace section.
Decor: 10/10. Need I say more?
TOTAL: 97/100.
Another award! Yay!

Cat Eyes (old layout)
First Glance: 7/10. The layout is nice and welcoming, but the banner is too big, looks bad, and blinks incessantly. Not a good sign. Maybe I'll dip my toe in here, but not for long.
Layout: 15/20. Did you make any of the stuff yourself? You have a huge list of credits (at least you're crediting them!) for various buttons, pixels, the layout, and pretty much everything on the page except the words. Maybe you should learn to do them yourself using a tutorial, or seek help on the boards.
Content: 20/30. Eeek! All the buttons are uncategorized and look like a tornado ran through them. You make no effort to check if the sites have closed/moved, and with all the extra info floating around on the page, it doesn't even seem to be the main thing. Plus, it seems many of the cat graphics sites are of bad quality.
Word Use: 9/10. You misspelled "reviews" in your goals section. Otherwise, good job!
Links: 3/5. Many of the listed sites have link borders, and most of your buttons look bad too. You do not need to request cat buttons from cat sites. There are many great button sites out there who would love to take your request.
Images: 4/5. None of them are really your images, and I pointed out their quality already.
Originality: 9/10. I have to admit, a cat directory is ingenious and unique, but you must learn to say "no" to the less reputable applicants. If you clean up a little and start making some elements your own, you could make a name for yourself here.
Decor: 8/10. The four categories at the bottom really belong on the sidebar where they can be seen and admired. Plus, your news should be in a scroll bar to save space. Everything else is good.
TOTAL: 75/100.

Aberrant Runes Graphics
First Glance: 10/10. Ooh, pretty banner. It caught my attention, and everything else matches perfectly. You don't see that often!
Layout: 17/20. What's with the small font?!?! Of course, it may just be my computer making everything tiny, but this is really, really small. And why are all the different things on different pages? It only makes it harder to update all of them and fix glitches, plus the individual pages load slower.
Content: 30/30. Here, you are the undisputed queen. Who else can make all that stuff, maintain a layout, and more? I'm wondering about that title, but I expect it'll be explained in some time.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes!
Links: 3/5. Interesting hover effects. However, your link backs aren't that great, and you need some color variety.
Images: 5/5. Everything rocks in this area, considering your talent. If I could give you ten thumbs up, I would.
Originality: 10/10. From blogs to lookups, you've perfected your style in a million different ways. You can definitely climb to the top of the ladder.
Decor: 8/10. You need to keep all your updates, and put them in a scroll box. A counter would be helpful too. Many people overlook these things, but they really matter.
TOTAL: 93/100.
You got an award!!!

Aniimal_Crossings Graphics
First Glance: 7/10. Your banner is badly made--it looks as if you took the picture and slapped some turquoise (!) words in a medieval font onto it. Doesn't look good. The background wasn't meant to be in tiled form, and what color theme are you enforcing? Blue, yellow, or something entirely different?
Layout: 17/20. There's a lot to scroll, mostly because you have only one column and a lot of stuff in it. Even if you don't prefer sidebars, a scroll box or two could save a lot of space. Another problem is your organization. Your form is in the Welcome section, definitely the wrong place. And your list of premades should either be put in a scroll box or in neat rows.
Content: 30/30. Now I'm impressed. You found all those icons, put tiny but readable text in them, and put them up for all to use! And they're cute, too. Quality and quantity are both plentiful. Two thumbs up!
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. Some of your buttons are awful, but mostly they're okay, so I only took off a point for that. Your text links are visible, readable, and hover effects are fine. Good work!
Images: 4/5. Again, only one point docked (for the banner). Your little pics are cute and well-made.
Originality: 8/10. Your layout may stand in the way of success, but your work is fantastic! Just clear some hurdles and you'll prosper.
Decor: 7/10. When people sign up to be an affie, they want to advertise and be seen, not stuffed at the bottom of the page. Same goes for reviewers and directories. They want to be NOTICED. Oh yeah, and your updates need to be in a scrollbox to save space, and the newest ones should be on top so readers can see when you were on last.
TOTAL: 87/100.

Pretense
First Glance: 10/10. Ooh, pwetty. I love the intricate banner and the purplish color theme. With that and a cool name like Pretense, I'm so staying.
Layout: 20/20. The layout may have originated from KillTheLights, but your banner, and the pick of color, makes it very original. Besides, one of my own sites comes from KTL as well (on LilStarcey's page), so who am I to criticize?!
Content: 28/30. Roleplay, huh? I never did understand how that worked, and now I get it. Your info might be confusing to some, though. Maybe you should run a roleplay site of your own?...still, it's amazing how much you've gathered in TWO DAYS! Phenomenal!
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes. For a page of this length, that's huge.
Links: 5/5. Site and page navigation--a rare wonder these days. You don't know how many times I had to come down on people with only one or the other. Your one button and text links are fine too.
Images: 4/5. There are hardly any at all, though the ones that do exist are good. Readers need some color to brighten up the hard chunks of words once in a while.
Originality: 10/10. This is the first roleplay guide I've ever seen, and it's super effective and fresh off the press. Triple thumbs up!
Decor: 8/10. Only 28 views? You need to work on advertisement. Plus, your updates should go in a scrollbar on the side, or you can have a blog, front and center (which is more fun anyway).
TOTAL: 95/100.
An award!! Congrats!

Lucy's Lookups
First Glance: 7/10. A boring banner, blue text, lime green borders, and moving buttons. Eeek!! I'm mostly staying because I have to.
Layout: 15/20. Too much motion. My computer actually froze! And what's your theme? I see blue, green, Xweetoks, fireworks...You need to decide what you want. Ask someone to make you a petpage, or find a premade.
Content: 27/30. Your lookups are sometimes good, sometimes hectic. It's nice how you have different styles, but must they all be Neo-related? Maybe you should go for an abstract look, if pictures of movie stars or such aren't your thing. Flavor and diversity in their style is the way many famous lookup pages function.
Word Use: 7/10. The text at the top is just rambly. Instead of a whole history section, you could put a little bit about that in the Welcome part. Your Styles section could be divided: Style One could be discussed in the section where you keep those kinds of lookups, for example. Exclusive uses this kind of ordering...I also noticed the rules. They are in large bold text. I know you want people to follow them, but you sound like a control freak. People WILL notice the rules.
Links: 5/5. You've got it down.
Images: 4/5. The banner is very bland. It's the leading image, and a bland banner can make a bad impression on newcomers. I do love your Xweetok pics, though!
Originality: 8/10. Ehhh. Your lookups are fine, but they need some diversity. Your background is fine, but it needs to be spiced up. Your banner isn't fine. Overall, your page needs a renovation, but I'm sure you'll be able to do it.
Decor: 10/10. You're doing well in this area.
TOTAL: 83/100.

The Two Timer
First Glance: 10/10. Cute banner! Your background is intricate and pretty, and the layout is fine if not matching.
Layout: 17/20. When I looked closer at your page, I discovered many small problems that could explode later on. Why is your banner inside a header tag? Why have you barely edited Exclusive's layout? Why are the headers green when nothing else is? Please address these problems and solve them.
Content: 25/30. Sometimes your reviews sound choppy, and you move from one topic to another without transition, like "Alot of site names are picked randomly. Its a good name but its missing something." You talk about one thing for one sentence, then jump to the next. It's confusing and readers don't get more information about their problems. Plus, it would be nice if you put a scroll box around your numerous reviews.
Word Use: 8/10. Sometimes you don't capitalize or spell a word right, like "It's kind of catchy i geuss.
Links: 4/5. A lot of your image links have ugly green borders. To solve this the code should look like this:

(I used my award image as an example.) That should help a little.
Images: 5/5. Like I said, your banner is cute, and your buttons are pretty too. You know how to handle pictures!
Originality: 10/10. You may have made several minor errors and no real theme, but you're definitely original. That's a compliment!
Decor: 9/10. No updates?! Readers need to know when you were last on and what you did. And if you save them all, they'll see how much progress you've made.
TOTAL: 88/100.

Vintage Wonderland
First Glance: 10/10. Nice banner! Your title is creative, and the layout is wonderfully original.
Layout: 18/20. The navigation looks out of place next to the updates (at least you have updates!) and what's the color theme, anyway? I see black, green, grey, brown...just decide already! XD
Content: 25/30. You're going overboard with the rules (credit! credit! credit!) and have you completed any requests? If you have, they should be in their own section. Plus, you should try and edit some images of those celebrities; make the pictures your own! Most of the images are squashed or stretched, anyway. Could there be other types of icons too, not just pictures of random stars? Like funny ones, or Neo-related?
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 3/5. Your buttons aren't so great, not even the one someone else made. Try contacting Circus or Greyscaled Buttons for a high-quality button. (Both sites' requests were closed at press time but they may be open by the time you read this.) I also noticed that my button wasn't on there...did you forget?
Images: 5/5. Your icons may be slightly off, and your banner a little...strange, but no worries. Everything's A-OK around here.
Originality: 9/10. To tell the truth, I've seen many sites like yours: good quality, but unable to capture the limelight. That's what YOU have to do. Improve pretty much everything about your site (sorry) and then you'll really be on top.
Decor: 8/10. Ehhh. On Firefox, which is where I review, your counter isn't centered, but on IE it is. How does that work? And you have very few visitors and affiliates. Maybe you should advertise some more.
TOTAL: 88/100.

Sugary Premades
First Glance: 10/10. Sweet banner (no pun intended)! Your layout is all matching colors, and overall, it's verrry welcoming. I'm staying.
Layout: 18/20. Must it be all beige? Of course, not all of it is. But some parts are a bit bland. The background and borders, for example. (ARGH! I've got to drop these b's!) Your layout is very stylish though, and everything is in tip-top shape.
Content: 30/30. Everything is organized and the layouts rock. You have everything I have/never thought of having. So relax. This review will be easy.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 4/5. I'm wondering why some of your headers have hover effects, but it's very common, so no worries. Your other links are fine, and your affie list is neat and elite.
Images: 5/5. Duh, you get a perfect score. With that banner, and all those assorted pictures, why not?
Originality: 10/10. A very original idea, candy. I like the way you've got a great business running in barely more than a week. Keep up the good work!
Decor: 10/10. You got it down.
TOTAL: 97/100.
You got an award!! Scroll down and get it, my friend.

Cyn's Art Guide and Tutorial
First Glance: 8/10. Your banner looks squished, and not too many of your colors match. Orange, green, blue...
Layout: 19/20. I can't say much about it, since it's premade. But what's with the sideways scrollbars? Is there a reason for the empty space to the right of nearly every box? And what about the weird colors? (Already addressed, so no extra points off.)
Content: 29/30. Perfect easily. Your information is in-depth and I read it all the way through. However, the name of your site is a little bland and straightforward. Choose a theme (like Weewoos or whatever) and use it.
Word Use: 10/10. No mistakes.
Links: 3/5. They're hidden beneath the About section, and most of the buttons stink anyway. The second and third are okay. Your text links hit the spot: not flashy, not invisible...Speaking of text links, I really need to change this site's hover effects. LOL.
Images: 5/5. No blurry pictures, and the tutorial images rock. Passed with flying colors.
Originality: 10/10. Sure, the decoration could use some work, but the content is what matters, and you have got it down. I bookmarked your page, if that helps any.
Decor: 9/10. It's all in hiding. Maybe you should put your link backs and counters either in their own space or with the affies, and the About part of the main text. That would help a lot.
TOTAL: 93/100.
You got an award! Go and get it now.

Moonlight Reviews
First Glance: 9/10. The banner is stretched too wide, but I like the (overused) theme, so I'm staying--for now, anyway.
Layout: 19/20. Not yours, but it's good. I am wondering about the counter and credit section, though. There's no white behind the text, and it's barely visible. The dark blue links make it worse.
Content: 27/30. You don't need three reviewers; it just messes everything up, since exactly one person can edit the page. Besides, I managed all these reviews since June alone. You finished only six in one month. Also, you chop too many points off for minor mistakes. It happens often. Be a little bit less harsh, and state which browser you use, since that can affect results.
Word Use: 7/10. I don't like the way you ramble, misspell words, and repeat yourself. This is stuff I learned in fifth grade. Now, I know about the occasional typo, but you have several mistakes. The good thing is that you aren't using chatspeak, which is a capital offense!
Links: 5/5. Yeah, they're fine. Your buttons are okay, and your text links match.
Images: 5/5. Like I said, you stretched the banner, but it looks fine normal sized. It's really the only noticeable picture.
Originality: 8/10. Your reviewing style is a little off. Your layout is premade and has a gap in it (remember the Counter and Credit sections). You're sluggish in your reviews. You have bad grammar. All in all? It's time to renovate.
Decor: 9/10. You are too focused on this. Enough affies, enough directories. Concentrate on the reviews. Did you give credit for the counter? I believe it's a Boingdragon, or did you make it yourself? You do have everything on the list though, which is great.
TOTAL: 89/100.

Waiting List

Award

I cannot stress this enough. Don't take this award unless you earned it!!! I don't want to start a Wall of Shame, so do not copy and paste this unless I say you can!
If you would like a custom award, I can make one for you. Nowadays, it probably WILL be beautiful, so just ask. =)

This award is for my affiliates ONLY!!!!!!!!!! Drag to address bar for full size.

NEOPETS, characters, logos, names and all related indicia
are trademarks of Neopets, Inc., © 1999-2009.
® denotes Reg. US Pat. & TM Office. All rights reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY | Safety Tips | Contact Us | About Us | Press Kit
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions

Navigation

Updates

Affiliates

Form

Link Back

Counter

Sister Sites

Listed In