Updates

June 17, 2009

Reviews are still closed. New reviews will be posted soon!
Mari
---------
May 16, 2009

Reviews are currently closed for a while. The sites on the waiting list will be reviewed.
Mari
---------
May 14, 2009

A few sites have been added to the waiting list these past two weeks. New reviews will be posted soon.
Mari
---------
May 1, 2009

Four new reviews have been added.
Mari
---------
April 26, 2009

Three more sites have been added to the waiting list this week.
Mari
---------
April 18, 2009

Five new reviews posted today.
Mari
---------
April 9, 2009

I'm a little behind on the reviews due to exams. Just updating to let everyone know I'm still around and will post the reviews when I get the chance. Thanks for your patience!
Mari
---------
April 4, 2009

So far the waiting list has five people. The reviews will be posted at the beginning of next week.
Mari
---------
April 2, 2009

The next reviews will probably be posted later this week or the beginning of next week.
Mari
---------
March 28, 2009

All reviews have been finished, except those that were postponed.
Mari
---------
March 22, 2009

New reviews will be posted sometime in the middle of next week. Most of them are done, I just have to finish a few and post.
Mari
---------
March 18, 2009

Five new reviews added.
Mari
---------
March 16, 2009

I've added a lot of affiliates and applied to be listed in some directories. The waiting list is beginning to fill up again. Thanks to all who apply!
Mari
---------
March 14, 2009

I have posted six reviews today.
Mari
---------
March 13, 2009

I've added one more site to the waiting list. I have three reviews finished so far- I will post everything tomorrow and neomail the applicants.
Mari
---------
March 11, 2009

Currently, I have five sites on the waiting list. The reviews will be completed and posted this weekend. Thanks to those that have applied!
Mari
---------
March 9, 2009

Hello everyone!
Today is the grand opening of "Pumpkin Pie Reviews", my second site (although its been open a bit longer, today is its official opening day!). Why a review site, you ask? Well, it's one of the more difficult sites to run because it involves some work, sometimes so much that these types of sites seem to close all the time. And I like a challenge. Anyways, if you would like to have your site reviewed, please neomail me the review request form!
Thanks,
Mari



Link Back










My Other Site




Affiliates

To become and affiliate, please neomail me the following form. You must have an 88x31 button or your site will be posted as a text link.

If you become an affiliate you must link back within one week or I remove your button.



Mari, I would like to become an affiliate of "Pumpkin Pie Reviews".
Your Name:
Your Site:
URL:
Thanks!


Click here to be reviewed by the Juxtaposer Click here for Authentic Reviews! Click here to visit the Good Guide Simplicity Site Reviews


Pending Affiliates



Listed At

A Petpage Directory I'm Listed on Sandstar's Directory! You should be too! Click here to visit the Good Guide

Pending



Welcome to Pumpkin Pie Reviews,
guest


Welcome to Pumpkin Pie Reviews, where you can submit your site to be evaluated. My name is Mari and I have been on Neopets for seven years, on and off, so I'm not new to Neopets or petpages; I'm just new at being the owner of a petpage review site and petpage directory :) Pumpkin Pie Reviews is my second site and my first review site. If you want to apply for a review, check the sign below to see if reviews are open and neomail me the form.



Reviews are currently:



To have your site reviewed, fill out the form and neomail it to me:



Mari, please review my site.
Your Name:
Your Site:
URL:
Brief Description:
Have you read the rules?
Questions? Comments?


To have your site re-reviewed, fill out the form below and neomail it to me:



Mari, please re-review my site.
Your Name:
Your Site:
URL:
Previous Score:
What changes have you made to your site since the last time I reviewed it?
Questions? Comments?


Rules

1. Make sure reviews are OPEN before submitting.

2. Fill out the form completely. Sites submitted to review without the form shall not be reviewed. You are allowed to cancel your request at any time, but if you request again, I will not cancel.

3. I will not review "About Me" pages or guilds. I changed the rules, so now I will review review sites. I also will not review sites under construction or on hiatus (due to the fact that some points are given for updates).

4. The reviews are my opinion. By submitting the form, you are requesting my opinion, so do not be discouraged or send hate/complaining neomails if you do not receive the score you wanted.

5. If you disagree with something in the review, see rule #4. Do not neomail me complaining- again see rule #4. However, if you would like me to clear something up or would like me to expand on a point I made, do neomail me, please.

6. When I receive your request, you will be put on the waiting list and I will neomail you. All requests are fulfilled in the order they are received. I will also neomail you when the review is finished.

7. Do not neomail me asking me when I will review your site- the answer is "When I have time".

8. You must link back before, during and after the review. If my link back button is not on your site the day of the review, I will not review your site.

9. If you are asked if you read the rules, your reply should be: Yes because meepits are scary. Re-Reviews are allowed only if you scored LESS than an 80% and if you made a noticeable change. To have your site re-reviewed, submit the re-review form.



Grading Scale

First Impression(15) This is what I think of the site when I first see it. The first impression can either cause the person to leave or stay and look at your site. I consider this the most important part of the review.

Layout(15) This includes the general set up of the site and color choices. Can I read everything? Do your colors go well together? (Note: I will not mark you down if I don't like your color choices, but I will if they clash). I also include music choice because I consider it an important part of the layout. Does your music match your site? Does it make me wish my computer didn't have speakers or is it appropriate for the site? If your site does not have music, you will not be marked down.

Content(15) There are two extremes here and you can be marked off for both: You have very little content and almost no variety. Or you have too much content and the page takes forever to load and the amount of information overwhelms me so much I don't want to read it all. The first problem can be solved by adding more content; the second problem can be solved by eliminating unnecessary graphics or having the content very, very organized. Too much content can be almost as negative as too little content.

Organization (15) Can I find everything quite easy? Are there meaningless graphics taking up space and ruining the page?

Important Site Features (10)
  • Have a credits section. Even if you created everything yourself- then credit yourself. A credits section is necessary.
  • Updates are important. Have at least one update and it must be recent- no older than 10 days.
  • There should be a link to neomail you, no matter the type of site you have- a simple text link is fine.
  • Counters make the site look more professional, so it's a good idea to have one.
  • Its important to have an 88x31 link back button if you want most people to link to your site- currently some sites are requiring them in order to link back (including me)
Spelling and Grammar(10) No "misteaks" please :) Yes, I misspelled it on purpose. Don't neomail me about it.

Uniqueness(10) Among all the sites that are like yours (I own quite a large directory, so I have a massive point of comparison) how unique is your page? Does it stand out to me among the others?

Overall(10) I ask myself the question, "Between 1 through 10, how do you rate this site overall?" That's how I get the points for this category.

= 100 Total Points Possible



The Reviews

Erika's Lookups


First Impression: 14/15
The site is colorful, bright and has a name that stands out. Although the name of the site (Thunderstruck) and the rainbows don't seem to match, the site still looks good. Right away one can tell what the purpose of the petpage is (premade user lookups), which is excellent.

Layout: 12/15
The two-column layout is good for this site and the background and banner are bright and cheerful, yet not overly colorful; however, the headers do not seem to match. Everything else is so colorful, so it seems as though the headers are rather plain. Also, there should be a little space between each of the lookup categories so that everything doesn't look crammed together.

Content: 15/15
There are lots of layouts to choose from and they are all very creative.

Organization: 12/15
I think that a navigation should not be in a scroll box. Other than this, the layouts look good in scroll boxes so that they don't take up too much room.

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 0/2 points. It's important to have a credits section. Even if you created everything, credit yourself.
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points. Matches perfectly with the rest of the site.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 7/10
There were quite a few spelling mistakes visible like, for example "Miscellaneous" (not "Misalaneous").

Uniqueness: 9/10
It's difficult to find a petpage that has non-neopets lookups, especially one that has this much variety. Therefore for uniqueness you receive nine points.

Overall: 9/10
The site shows a lot of effort and creativity. There are only a few things that need to be fixed, like the simple headings, spelling mistakes, navigation, and spacing. Other than that, great work!

=86/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Square One


First Impression: 13/15
The site is most definitely a bright color. My first impression is that I do not know what the purpose of the site is. One could think that it was just a blog pet page, since the name does not give a hint at anything and the "rainbow" is partially covering both the name of the site and the navigation.

Layout: 13/15
This type of layout is good because everything is on a different page. The background is simple, but since the banner itself so colorful, it doesn't matter. The only part that is confusing about the layout is the categories. The Navigation is quite vague (for example, "Resources"?). Also, the main page would look better if there was some room between the navigation and the top affiliates.

Content: 15/15
There is a good amount of content and variety. Good work!

Organization: 13/15
The disorganization on the site comes from the navigation being vague. It's difficult to find link back buttons or a neomail link. And, like I mentioned above, the category titled "Resources" is also unclear.

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.Maybe an envelope graphic would be a good idea and more eye-catching.
Counter: 0/2 points. I think adding a counter lets you know how popular your site is becoming. And it's also encouraging to see the number or visitors rise every day.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 9/10
The layout and the look of the layouts and pet pages are what make this site stand out. Therefore for uniqueness you receive nine points.

Overall: 9/10
I think the site is good, with only a few little details to fix, which I mentioned above. Good work on the site!

=90/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Kam's Music Codes


First Impression: 10/15
The first impression of the site is not very good. Apart from the fact that there is no banner and the site looks too plain, the font is difficult to read, therefore making the site difficult to navigate.

Layout: 9/15
The one column layout is good for a music sit, but a two column layout, in my opinion, would work out even better because link back buttons and other information would not be at the very bottom of the page. The site needs a banner- something maybe with the name of the site. The colors for the site are not good because they make everything difficult to read. I can see that the purpose was to match the colors with the background graphic, but those colors are too light by themselves. Also, the headings could be made to stand out more with a bigger font, a background heading graphic, or a color that stands out more. The updates should be in scroll boxes or eventually they'll take up too much room. Also, the invisible scroll bar, although it may seem nice, is not good for navigation.

Content: 12/15
There is a lot of different music, which means variety. Good work!

Organization: 12/15
I saw a few organization problems with the site. The updates are not in scroll boxes and eventually they'll take up to much room. Second, the scroll bar is not visible. I count the scroll bar as an organization problem because it makes it difficult for people to find what they are looking for or scroll the page quickly. Usually, people don't click the Up/Down arrows, so in my opinion a visible scroll bar is necessary. Finally, there is no form to request music. It's much neater and easier to provide a form and it makes the site much more organized.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points. Good visible neomail envelopes.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 5/10
Even though there are a lot of codes, I think that in order for the site to stand out among other music sites it has to be more readable and have a few graphics (for example, a banner). Therefore for uniqueness you receive five points.

Overall: 6/10
The site has good content but the problem is the way the page is set up. Some work on the layout will improve the site greatly.

=76/100 Points
No award this time, but do not be discouraged. Your site has great potential.


Anime Block


First Impression: 12/15
The impression that the site gives at first glance is "fancy!". The site is simple, easy to navigate and to the point; however, a little brightening up would help it seem more welcoming.

Layout: 10/15
The two column layout works, and the plain background with an image on the right goes well; however, I think that there is too much space between the top of the page and the banner. Another problem I noticed with the layout was the headings. Some of the headings, like for example "Hello!" and "Icons" have a cloudy colorful background, while others like "Updates" and "Links" are plain. The sites colors and font a readable, but the colors are too random. There seems to be no theme and too many different colors.

Content: 15/15
There are a lot of icons to choose from.

Organization: 15/15
The site is organized and easy to navigate. Good work!

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points. For a graphics site, I think a neomail link could be a graphic in order to help it stand out more.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 1/2 points.There are quite a variety of link back buttons, but some of them are difficult to read.

Spelling and Grammar: 8/10
There were a few spelling and grammar mistakes visible.

Uniqueness: 8/10
Out of the anime graphics sites I have seen, this one is probably the most organized. In order to make the site stand out more amongst the rest, more graphics should be added. For uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 8/10
The site has good content, but there are a few things that need work. I think the layout needs to be fixed a little (like I mentioned above) and the link back buttons need to be made readable.

=84/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Grantauy's All-in-One Guide


First Impression: 9/15
My first impression of the site is that there is so much information, it's overwhelming. The site is bright and welcoming, but what might make people search for another page is the fact that there is too much on the page.

Layout: 10/15
I think, based on the amount of information on the site, that it would look better as a three column layout. It's very good that the separate sections are in scroll boxes; otherwise the page would be way too long. One thing that I found wrong with the layout was centering. In the right column, all the text seems to be aligned left rather than being centered, which seems to be because of the width of the scroll boxes. The font color and the overall colors of the site are readable. The "Back to Top" links are useful for navigation. Good work!

Content: 14/15
There is a lot of content, no doubt about that, but I have to take off points because it's difficult to find what one is looking for. There's enough information on the page to make several different pet pages. The Table of Contents is not alphabetized, so that makes it difficult to navigate all the information.

Organization: 10/15
The page is organized; however, it would be very helpful if the Table of Contents was alphabetized. Also, the page would look neater if the right column were centered and not aligned left. I think it would also be a good idea to put a little more space between the sections so that the information does not look crowded together.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.Good work updating almost daily!
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.Lots of variety!

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 9/10
What makes this site unique is the useful information and the fact that it's updated constantly, which is helpful when it comes to pricing. Therefore for uniqueness you receive nine points.

Overall: 8/10
The site needs a little bit of improvement. The content is all there; I think the problem lies in the way it is presented/organized. Some work on the layout could improve the site greatly.

=80/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


The Frequent Fruzo


First Impression: 10/15
When I first saw the site, I did not know what the purpose of it was. The banner does not give a hint and neither does the name. It is a creative name though, but it doesn't say anything about the site. The site looks rather plain; maybe because of the background being just a solid color and the banner being too simple. Other than this, from just scrolling the page the site gives the impression that there are a lot of links and that it's a useful dailies page.

Layout: 12/15
The layout for the site is good and looks organized; however, as I mentioned above, the site looks plain. In my opinion, the site could use a little more brightening up with the addition of more colors or maybe using a different shade of the colors already there. Also, the banner is really nice but I think it too can use a little more brightening up. As for the columns themselves, the text is at the very edge of the table, which can easily be fixed by adding "padding". The Navigation is good, except I think it would look better if the beginning letters were capitalized and if "free food, free neopoints" weren't aligned to the very left of the column.

Content: 15/15
It looks as though all the important and useful dailies links are listed on the page. Good work!

Organization: 14/15
The site looks very organized; everything is in a category and there is a navigation. The only thing that makes the site look disorganized is the fact that the first letter of the words aren't capitalized on most of the left column but they are on the rest of the page. I think the site should be consistent with the way things are written.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
There is a good, visible envelope neomail link.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.There are different color buttons and therefore variety.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
I've seen quite a lot of Dailies sites. It's difficult to tell exactly what makes them stand out because almost all have the same links listed. I think that what truly makes a dailies page stand out is the way the information is presented- meaning that the site is organized, links are easy to find, and the layout is welcoming. For uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 8/10
In my opinion, the site is good, although I think there needs to be a few changes made, like brightening up the layout and banner, adding "padding" to the columns, and capitalizing words. Also, there are many dailies pages out there- I think it's a good idea to try to be listed in more directories so that there are more visitors.

=87/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Graphic Sites: A Complete Guide


First Impression: 12/15
My first impression of the site is that it seems very "island". At a first glance one can tell that the site is straight to the point. The only thing I found rather unwelcoming was the dull yellow color in the background.

Layout: 13/15
The three column layout for the site is very good. Information can be found quite easily. The site has a good navigation and clear headings which makes it easier to find what one is looking for. The font and the font color are readable and a good size. As for the banner, it's simple and small yet it goes well with the rest of the layout. Again, the only part that's dull is the background. It's not so much the color, but the shade. Also, I think it would be good to add "padding" to the columns because the text is right on the edge and makes it look messy.

Content: 15/15
The site goes into detail about what is needed for a successful graphics site. There is enough information and it's written with few words, stating mostly only important information. Good work!

Organization: 15/15
All the information on the site is in logical order. Since it's a guide on how to create a successful graphics site, it's important that the information be in order and easy to follow. Also, the navigation is very clear and stands out.

Important Site Features: 6/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.The neomail link, although there's no graphic for it, was easy to find.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 1/2 points.I think there should be options when it comes to link back buttons; however, the fact that there is a text link is very useful. I think adding more buttons that stand out more is a good idea.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
The uniqueness of this site is in the way the information is organized and in the effort one can see. There are quite a few guides out there, and out of all of them I think this is one of the more useful. Therefore, for uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 8/10
I think overall the site is very good; however, I think there are a few things that can be worked on. Like I mentioned above, the dullness of the background is not very welcoming, the columns need "padding" so the text is not right at the edge of the table, and more creative link back buttons could be added.

=90/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Shattered Crystals


First Impression: 14/15
At first glance the layout and brightness of your site is quite impressive. My first impression of the site is that it's cheerful, colorful and full of graphics. It is definitely an improvement over the last layout because the site seems more welcoming and light.

Layout: 12/15
The top portion of the layout, with the name of the site, updates, welcome and character is well made. The combination was done perfectly so that it does not look cluttered. I think that something more creative can be done with the layout on the rest of the page. The two column layout, although good, looks plain in comparison to the creative banner. The only other problem I see is spacing. For example, between "Back to Top" and "Zelda Graphics" there should be some space so that it does not look messy. The animated graphic that you chose to put next to your headings is eye-catching and improves the heading. Your color choice is good- everything can be read quite easily.

Content: 15/15
The site has many graphics and variety and it does not take long to load. Good work!

Organization: 15/15
Everything on the site is easy to find. The Navigation has a good size font that is easy to read. Also, the graphics are displayed in a very organized way.

Important Site Features: 6/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points. That has to be the longest list of credits/thank you's I've ever seen on a petpage.
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
There are many graphics and that's what makes this type of site stand out. For uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 8/10
I think that the site has a lot of content and variety, so there is no problem there; however, I think the bottom portion of the layout needs a little bit of work so that it stands out and is as creative as the top portion of the site.

=92/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


JB Fan Graphics


First Impression: 10/15
Well, if a person is a fan of the Jonas Brothers, the larger than usual banner can be a positive thing; however, it is rather too large and a bit overwhelming. My first impression of the site is that there are a lot of graphics to choose from. Scrolling down the page variety is quite evident.

Layout: 12/15
The layout of the site works well for a graphics site, but there should definitely be a "navigation" because there is a lot of content and this can make it a little difficult to find what one is looking for. Also, I think the banner is a bit too big. As for the music, it obviously goes well with the site because it's the Jonas Brothers. The color choice is also good because it's not too bright and one can easily read everything.

Content: 12/15
You have quite a variety of graphics and not just Jonas Brothers graphics. Good work!

Organization: 10/15
Since there are so many graphics on the site and they are split up into sections, I think the page would be much more organized if there were a navigation. The icons on the side seem somehow out of place. The graphics are mainly in the center of the page and the only ones that are on the side are the icons, which when I was scrolling through quickly for first impression I thought they were a variety of link back buttons. Also, since the site allows people to request different graphics, I think there should be a form to neomail and a visible neomail link to make it easier.

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 0/2 points. I think there should be a visible neomail link in order for people to request graphics.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.There are different size buttons and you have the standard 88X31.Great!

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
I've seen a few Jonas Brothers graphics sites and I think that what makes this site stand out is the amount of content and variety. There are definitely a lot of graphics to choose from. So for uniqueness, you receive an eight points.

Overall: 8/10
I think there are a few things that need to be added to the site in order to make it even better. Like I mentioned above, a "navigation" would make the site easier to look through and a request form and a visible neomail link would make requesting easier and more organized.

=81/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


The Juxtaposer

Click here to be reviewed by the Juxtaposer

First Impression: 15/15
My first impression of the site is that it's professional and very well made. At first, it's not evident that this is a review site but that soon becomes very obvious when scrolling down the page. The site is welcoming due to the introduction and the soft and elegant color choice. Nice work!

Layout: 14/15
I think your site is the perfect example of a one-column review site that just works. It's difficult to have a review site that only has one column because the information has to be in good order so that it makes sense and looks organized. The only thing I see missing is a "Navigation", which I think would be useful in order to link directly to specific reviews or sections. The colors of the site are a good choice (pink , black and white)- the site looks stylish, professional and simple. The banner is just basically text but it goes well with the simplicity of the layout.

Content: 15/15
The site has been open for a while; however, there are only two reviews. I will not mark you off for content because you don't have anyone on the waiting list and everything seems updated.

Organization: 14/15
As I mentioned before, the site is very organized for a one column page. Your site also has all the necessary sections for a review site: a waiting list, review form, grading scale, rules, etc. Again, I think the only thing you are missing is a "Navigation" in order to navigate the reviews easier.

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 0/2 points. . There is are no updates and I think that this is very important for a review site because it lets people know if you are still reviewing, the progress of reviews, etc.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 12/10
Yes, I gave two extra points for uniqueness. Why? Because the site shows a lot of creativity, from the applications all the way to the headings, and the fact that it tells a story along the way. Completely unique, so you receive twelve points.

Overall: 9/10
I don't think the site needs any work. If anything, maybe add a "navigation", updates and a sign that states if reviews are open or not. Great work!

=97/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


reddyeddy_'s Book of Pet Pages


First Impression: 12/15
Well, that's definitely a pet page directory, no doubt about it. Very good and creative choice for a banner- right to the point and it makes it obvious that the site is a directory. Your site definitely gives the impression that one will find what one is looking for. Good work!

Layout: 12/15
The layout for the site is quite good; however, the column that starts with "Welcome" slightly overlaps the banner. The choice of colors is creative but they do not match. I think the color of the background does not go well with the banner or the shade of yellow of the columns. As for the columns, I think they would look better if they were "padded" slightly so that the text is not right on the edge of the table.

Content: 12/15
You have many pet pages listed, so therefore there is a lot of variety. Good work!

Organization: 13/15
Your site looks very well organized. I think the text under "Navigation" should be a little bit bigger because it's a bit difficult to read. Also, the "Directory Form" should be in a more visible spot. The spot where it's located does not make sense because it's an important part of the directory and it's a little more than halfway down the page.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points. It's good you update often. The only thing wrong with the updates section is that the updates for March 18 run into the ones from March 24. This makes it look a little messy.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.You have link back buttons that are different sizes; there are a few of the buttons that I think are the most important, which are the 88X31 size buttons, and that's good because some sites require them when one wants to become an affiliate.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
You have a lot of pages listed on the site, which is good because I think the more variety you have in a directory, the more unique it will be. Therefore, for uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 9/10
I think that your site is very good, but the color choice is not-so-good. Other than this, your site has a good amount of content and it is definitely a useful pet page.

=89/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Painted Hearts


First Impression: 9/15
Based on the overall layout I did not know that it was a review site- at first I actually thought it might be a graphics site. Only after looking through it more slowly did I realize it was a site for reviews. I think that this may be because the name does not hint at the purpose, which is perfectly fine, but I think that the banner or the first heading should specify that it's a review site.

Layout: 8/15
I think the layout that you have does not work well for a review site unless you have scroll boxes-otherwise the site will eventually become one long list. What will make this worse is the fact that there is no navigation to go directly to certain reviews. Updates should definitely be in scroll boxes or they take up too much room eventually. Also, the tables are not "padded" so the text is right near the edge of the table. The color choice for the site is nice, but I think the banner should stand out a little more and maybe show that it's a review site.

Content: 15/15
You have reviewed 5 sites so far. Good work!

Organization: 8/15
The layout messes up the organization of the site quite a bit. Like I mentioned before, there should be scroll boxes and definitely a "navigation" so that people can click and be taken directly to their reviews. As for the reviews themselves, they are well organized but there should be some space between each review. Your site has some of the necessary things for a review site, like a waiting list and grading scale but you are missing some very important sections: a review form for people to fill out and neomail and rules. Also, the "Criteria" and neomail link should not be at the very bottom of the page because they're an important part of the site.

Important Site Features: 7/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points. Good neomail link, but it should be near the top of the page. It was slightly difficult to find.
Counter: 0/2 points. I think adding a counter lets you know how popular your site is becoming. And it's also encouraging to see the number or visitors rise every day.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 6/10
I think that in order for your site to stand out among the many review sites, it needs to be a little more organized and have a review form.

Overall: 7/10
Your site needs a little bit of work like what I mentioned above about placing updates in a scroll box, "padding" the tables so the text isn't on the very edge, putting space between reviews so they don't look crowded, etc. I think that with a few changes, your site could become great.

=70/100 Points
No award this time, but do not be discouraged. Your site has great potential.


Transmogrification


First Impression: 12/15
Your site gives the impression of a serious guide. It looks like a site where one can definitely find the answer to their questions about Transmogrification; however, the page looks rather plain. Scrolling through it the first time it just looked like a long list.

Layout: 12/15
The color choices for the site are good but, like I mentioned before, the site looks a bit plain. The tables look like they should have a border or some sort of decoration. The banner font and graphics look nice, but I think it's rather small and the white background does not help it stand out. As for the navigation, in my opinion it's too small. It seems like it's hidden between two headings with large fonts.

Content: 15/15
The page looks like it pretty much explains everything about Transmogrification. The fact that the site has a picture of an unreleased mutant Uni and the prices of the different potions show that the site is attempting to remain current with the content.

Organization: 14/15
Every section is in its own table and each picture is the same size within its category, so this makes a site that has a lot of pictures look very organized. The only part I think needs to be fixed is the small navigation. A visible navigation on a site with a lot of graphics is very useful.

Important Site Features: 4/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 0/2 points. Every site should have a credits section. Even if the content was made by you, then credit yourself.
Updates: 1/2 points.
Neomail Link: 0/2 points. You ask people to neomail you to become an affiliate but there is no neomail link.
Counter: 1/2 points. The counter is there, however the numbers are not visible.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 10/10
So far I haven't seen any Transmogrification guides. Your guide is very useful, so for uniqueness you receive 10 points.

Overall: 8/10
The site definitely shows effort in the content but the layout needs a little bit of work.

=85/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Ace


First Impression: 14/15
My first impression of the site is that there is a lot to choose from- lookups, blends, fake avatars, etc. Yet the site is not very welcoming, maybe because there is too much grey and the banner is faded.

Layout: 8/15
Like I said before, I think that there is too much grey on the page and it makes it look dimmed. The two column layout is good for your site; however, it needs to be organized better. I think the navigation should be in a more visible place and the headings of each category should not be right at the edge of the table (add "padding" to your columns). As for the banner- I think there is too much on it and it makes it look messy. You have lyrics, the site name and updates on it, and the pictures themselves don't seem match with any of it.

Content: 15/15
You have a lot of categories on your site and a lot of graphics, so there is variety. Good work!

Organization: 12/15
The column on the right is well organized, but I think the column on the left needs some work. The navigation should be in a more visible spot. Also, the section titled "Site Names" looks out of place where it is.

Important Site Features: 8/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 1/2 points. It's good that you update often, but I think the spot that you chose for the updates is not good. There is already too much on the banner, so the updates should be separate.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points. There is a neomail link under "Short about site", but there should also be a neomail link near the request forms.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 6/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!However, there were a lot of grammar errors.

Uniqueness: 7/10
Your graphics are very nice but I think you need to add more content in order to stand out, and maybe make the page a little brighter.

Overall: 7/10
Your site needs a little work when it comes to organization. The graphics are good, but all the grey on the site makes it look dim and sad. Also, the banner is quite cluttered. I think your site is good and, with a little change, it can improve immensely.

=77/100 Points
No award this time, but do not be discouraged. Your site has great potential.


Eye of the Faerie


First Impression: 12/15
Your site has very light colors and it's almost like its floating on a cloud. The name suits it very well; however, upon first seeing it I can't tell what the site's content is. The name does not stand out because it's the same size font as the rest of the headers on the page. Other than this, the first impression is quite good.

Layout: 10/15
I think that the three column layout is good for the directory, as is the width of the columns, which are slightly wider than usual; however, the colors you have chosen are too light and can be difficult to read. In this case, I don't think the font colors should match the background exactly because it's so light. One can barely tell the background has polka dots. In fact, I think the thing that stands out the most on whole page is the origami bird. Also, I think your site needs a banner; one can barely tell the sites name because it's the same size as the rest of the headings.

Content: 12/15
You have more than 100 listing so far in such little time. Good work. The more great sites you list, the more options people will have and your directory will become more popular.

Organization: 13/15
Your site is organized in the sense that all the listing are sorted into categories, your affiliates all have the same size button and are in scroll boxes and the important headings are centered. The problem is the light colors, which make the site difficult to read and can slightly mess up organization. The font color you chose for the links under the navigation and directory are readable, but the light purples and oranges (???) are not, in my opinion, good, readable font colors.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points. A visible neomail link that's perfect for a directory because it gives the options of being listed or becoming an affiliate. Good work!
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points. The name of your site gives you a lot of options when it comes to link back buttons and it shows- your buttons are all different, nice and creative.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
Like I always say when it comes to directories, what I think makes a directory site stand out is the content and variety. There are a few important categories that you need to expand, like for example "Premade Layouts/Lookups/CSS" and "Music" because those are, in my opinion, the more popular sections of a directory.

Overall: 8/10
I know you decided to change your site's name; however, I think the current name is perfectly fine. What I think does need work are the colors on the page because they are too light. Also, I think the site needs a banner to make the name stand out more.

=86/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Final Destination Designs


First Impression: 12/15
When I first saw this site I thought it looked like an advertisement, maybe because of the "March 13, 2009, 1000th page view". My second thought was that the site might be under hiatus, because I saw updates, disclaimers and faqs and a preview at the bottom that made me think the site was not open yet. The navigation is not so visible and this, plus what I mentioned before can make the site confusing to the viewer.

Layout: 12/15
The layout of the site could be good, if only it were a little clearer. The fact that the navigation is not very visible and seems to be a part of the banner makes the site difficult to navigate in the beginning; however, once figured out it becomes easier to search. I noticed there are three different banners on the site- one at the entrance, one under lookups and another for the rest. The name of the site stays the same in color but the background color and pictures change; all the banners and colors look good and make the site look modern and detailed.

Content: 14/15
The lookups you have are quite nice, but I think you need a little more content.

Organization: 13/15
Again, I think the navigation is confusing and looks like it's part of the banner. Also, the buttons next to the navigation for "neomail", "neoboards", etc. are not clear. I did not know they were links and, when I figured it out, I did not know where they would link me to. The part of the sites with the lookups is organized into neat categories, as are your affiliates and where your site is listed. I did not notice that the lookups had a navigation on the left the first time I saw them; maybe because it was right under the rules and the title "Lookups" did not stand out.

Important Site Features: 9/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points. The neomail link is there, but it is not labeled or does not stand out in a way that is easy to find on the main page. The other neomail link under Affiliates is good.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
The layout of your site is unique and eye-catching, but what would make your site stand out more are more layouts. Therefore, for uniqueness you receive 8 points.

Overall: 8/10
Your site is creative when it comes to the layout and banner but I think the navigation should be more clear (both the one on the top of the page and the one on the layouts page). Also, the links next to the top navigation need to be more comprehensible (the buttons look slightly fuzzy).

=86/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Assessment 101


First Impression: 11/15
My first impression of the site was that it was kind of plain and it has a dramatic air of seriousness. It's evident it's a review site but it looks intimidating and like a report card. The feeling of this review site is that one is about to undergo some serious criticism. I'm thinking that it's the word "Assessment", since it is a term usually utilized in a school setting which rarely makes someone think positive thoughts.

Layout: 12/15
As I mentioned above, I thought the site was rather plain. It is directly to the point; the most decorative image on the site is the banner, which in my opinion looks pretty good and goes well with the background. The headers are just black text; however, you do decorate the text boxes and underline in general with dashed lines/borders. Basically, I think the background and the banner go perfectly well together while the columns/boxes (aka the rest of the layout) just look like they're out of place.

Content: 15/15
You have reviewed quite a lot of sites and your reviews are detailed and show effort. I consider the content of a review site the actual reviews, so I think you are doing a good job.

Organization: 14/15
Everything on your site is organized in logical order and easy to find. You also have all the necessary sections for a review site- waiting list, rules, review form, grading scale, updates and navigation. Good work organizing affiliates all with the same size buttons. However, I think that the contact form should not be at the very bottom of the page. The contact form is a very important part of a review site and important sections should be near the top, not next to the credits in a corner.

Important Site Features: 6/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points. A good neomail link, but it should not be at the bottom of the page.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 9/10
I think what makes your site stand out is how difficult it is to get an A. Out of all of the sites you have reviewed, currently as I am writing this no one has scored higher than an 89. You are one of the tougher reviews sites, which I think is what makes you stand out among the rest. Just don't discourage people too much, or maybe they won't apply.

Overall: 9/10
Other than the fact that I think the layout looks too plain and that the neomail link and contact form should not be at the bottom of the page, your site is looking really good. Just a little more work and it will be excellent.

=90/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Sandstar's Music

I go to Sandstar's Music for all my music code needs. Click here to go there now!

First Impression: 14/15
Your site is very bright. Upon first seeing it I can tell it's a music site, funny enough not due to the fact that the name stands out, but because the combination of the layout, along with the music choice and the choice of borders, color and bolding that stand out just says "MUSIC!". Your site just plain looks fun and carefree.

Layout: 13/15
I think the layout of the site is good for a music site because it makes it easier to find what one is looking for. The color choice is fun and, in my opinion, perfect for a music site. The colors of the background and the font match; you definitely have a lot of colors to choose from. The song you chose for the site can become annoying (by the way, it took quite a while to load), so it's good that you mention that one can stop it. One thing that I did not like about the site is the invisible scrollbar. Some people do not use the arrows to scroll, so I think a visible scrollbar is best. This is becoming popular among sites and, while it may be pretty, it makes the site difficult to navigate. Also, the parts of the site where you used light green for the font are difficult to read.

Content: 15/15
You definitely have a lot of music to choose from and there is a lot of variety. Not all Disney, hip-hop, or rock, but a little bit of everything.

Organization: 10/15
Although the music is organized, there were a few little problems. It says under FAQ's that songs can be requested if requests are open; however, there is no sign that says if requests are open or not. Also, there should be a form in order to request music and a visible "Neomail me" link to go with it. I think the part of the navigation under "Music is Organized by artist…" should have a color that is easier to read in order to navigate the site better.

Important Site Features: 9/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points.Although you do have a link, I had to hunt around for it. Since there are such a wide variety of colors on your page, I think that in order for this link to stand out more, it would have to be an envelope pixel or some other graphic.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
Among music sites, I think that what yours need in order to stand out more is a little more organization when it comes to requesting. Make it a little bit easier for people to request music by providing a form and a good neomail link.

Overall: 8/10
Your site is very good. Like I said, it's bright and fun. There are only a few little details which I think need fixing, like requesting, neomail, and the light green color. Also, maybe change to a song that loads quicker; the one you currently have takes too long to load. Other than that, excellent work.

=87/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Thunskyre Graphics


First Impression: 14/15
Different. Definitely "different" is the word to describe your site. When I first saw it, I was impressed by how neat, organized and welcoming it was. The way that you have set up the site makes it easy to navigate and I think it encourages people to return. The only part that I do not like is the name because, apart from being slightly difficult to pronounce, it does not stick in my mind. I think a site such as this should have a memorable and catchier name.

Layout: 13/15
The way the site is laid out is perfect. Each category has its own individual box and the effect this has is it makes the site look smaller, but at the same time the categories look larger. I think the banner is a good size, although when you first look at the site, what stands out is the plushie eyrie and not the part of the banner with the name, probably because the colors chosen for the "Welcome" are dull in comparison to those of the eyrie. I think your music choice goes well with the site; however, I couldn't find the name of the song or artist anywhere on your site.

Content: 14/15
You have five different categories although not much content. I marked you off only one point for this because your site seems to be new and what you do have is very nice. The button bases are absolutely wonderful; too bad they're "closed forever".

Organization: 15/15
Like I said above, the site is perfectly organized, with each category in its own box. The categories themselves are organized very well and everything is easy to find. All the categories are listed in an order which makes sense and, amazingly enough, your site proves it is possible to create a site in a way that it does not need a "navigation" when it has more than one category.

Important Site Features: 9/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 1/2 points. I don't see the name of the song/artist of your background music.
Updates: 2/2 points.You update almost on a daily bases. Wow!
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 9/10
Although there are many graphics sites out there, I think that yours stands out. It shows effort and the quality of the graphics is very good. Therefore, for uniqueness you receive 9 points.

Overall: 9/10
Your site does not have much to improve on; if anything, make the part of the banner that says "Welcome" stand out a little more. Also, add more graphics and maybe consider in the future adding more button bases because the ones you have are very unique and creative.

=93/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Jupiter Crystal Directory


First Impression: 12/15
My first impression of the site is that there is slightly too much green. The picture on the banner is nice but the writing on it is a little difficult to read. I can definitely tell that your site theme is Sailor Jupiter- your name and colors reflect it; however I still think that the green should be taken down a notch.

Layout: 10/15
The site is set up as two columns; I think it's difficult to have a directory with only two columns but you seem to have set it up well. There were a few things about the layout that I did not like- the "Updates" box is too narrow, making it difficult to read the updates, and the "Reviews" box is too wide. I think the headers for "My Other Sites" and "Listed At" should be in one line like the ones on the rest of the page. Also, maybe the "Affiliates" and "Listed At" could be in scroll boxes in order to take up less room and the counter could be centered.

Content: 14/15
For a directory that has been open less than a month, you have a lot of listings. You seem to have all the important categories listed. Good work!

Organization: 12/15
I think one of the most important features of a directory is the "Navigation" because it helps people find the categories easier. Besides that, your site is organized. All the buttons are the same size (good work!) and the categories and the categories below those are readable and can be told apart.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.Your buttons are nice but they are all the same picture. Maybe a little variety would be good.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
There are a lot of directories that, instead of using text links, use buttons; The most unique thing about your site is the name, which I think makes it stand out. Therefore, for uniqueness you receive eight points.

Overall: 8/10
The site needs to be fixed a little. Like I said above, some scroll boxes are too big while others are too small, and other tiny details. Also, keep adding more sites to your page- variety is a directory's best friend!

=84/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Silver Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Moonlit Links


Now Closed

First Impression: 15/15
My first impression of this site that it's Christmas-y (if that makes sense). The banner of the shoyru sitting in the snow, looking at the moon is very nice. By the name of the site, I thought it was going to be a little darker or maybe have something to do with faeries. I can tell right away that your site is a directory and the colors and layout make me want to continue navigating the page.

Layout: 13/15
A three column layout is perfect for a directory. The way you have split all the necessary site information into three columns is very good. Your use of scroll boxes so that affiliates and listings will not take up too much room is an excellent idea. Using different borders to underline the sections and the information below it is a good idea and makes everything easier to read. The color choices are perfect; some of the colors are light yet the text is still readable. One problem I saw was in the left column- all the headers on the page are centered except "Navigate", "Affies" and "Link Back".

Content: 12/15
You have many sites and categories listed; however, I saw a few important categories were not listed- for example, Music (a lot of people look for music for their lookups, petpages, shops, etc) and HTML and CSS guides are requested on the neoboards frequently.

Organization: 14/15
All the link back buttons are the same size (which can be difficult because not all sites have 88x31 buttons) so this makes the site look organized. The navigation has a good size font and is clearly visible. Also, the categories are in alphabetical order. I think there should be a little more space between the categories so that it doesn't look squished and maybe the sites themselves should be in alphabetical order.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points. I see you recently added a new link back button. It's good to have more than one link back button, just to give options.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
It's difficult for directories to stand out because there are many out there that use the same concept of link back buttons. But your site shows effort, time and organization, so for uniqueness you get eight points.

Overall: 9/10
The site is pretty much good and does not need much improvement. Fix the left column so that the headers are centered and maybe put a bit more space between the categories so it doesn't look crowded. And, of course, list more sites.

=91/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Green Light


First Impression: 14/15
Well, your site name definitely describes your site- the green color stands out a lot. The banner is a bit confusing, being that there is too much going on- the writing, the meerca with the neggs all over the place. On first glance, I can tell that your site is to the point. It's a Site of the Month site with the necessary content listed in a comprehensive way.

Layout: 13/15
I think the one column layout is perfect for this site. The green headers clearly split up the individual sections of the site and are easy to read. Like I said before, the site is to-the-point and the layout is simple, which I think is great for a SOTM site. Also, I think there is slightly too much green on the page.

Content: 15/15
It's going to be a difficult competition- you have 15 sites listed so far. That's very good. For voting purposes, that gives everyone a wide variety to choose from (if they happen upon the site without being asked to vote for a specific site) and it makes this more challenging. For a SOTM site, I think that you have the necessary things and good amount of content.

Organization: 15/15
I think there are no organization problems with your site. The order of the content is perfect and makes logical sense, which is important when the site is only one column and the information goes straight down the page. Your site loads quickly and easily and all the buttons are the same size (which I know can be a challenge), which makes the page look very organized.

Important Site Features: 9/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 1/2 points. You have a neomail link, but it should be made more visible. The color you chose does not stand out, so therefore the link doesn't either.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 10/10
I haven't seen many SOTM sites, and I imagine they can be difficult to run when voting lasts a whole month and the site is quite popular. Therefore, for uniqueness you get full points.

Overall: 9/10
There is not much you need to improve on, except making the neomail link more visible because, being a voting site, that particular link is quite important for people to submit their votes. Also, deadlines should be emphasized (like the "Submission for April SOTM, starts March 8th until March 31st"), maybe with a darker color.

=95/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Lauren's Links


First Impression: 14/15
Wow, lots of pink and reddish orange. This site is cheerful and bright. I can't tell at first glance what the content of your site is; however, your eye-catching banner clears that up right away.

Layout: 14/15
The site, being a directory, I think the main focus should be on the navigation and the content. The left column also has too much information and the navigation has small font and is in a corner. I couldn't find it until I was actually looking for it. As for the colors, I don't think that purple headers matches with the color theme of the site; however, the pink borders go well.

Content: 14/15
The site is evidently more for quality than quantity, which can sometimes be good for a directory; however, I think you should list more sites. When people are looking for something specific, they like a lot of variety, especially with premades and graphics. You should also consider adding a "Music" section.

Organization: 14/15
The content is all in alphabetical order, which is good for a directory. I think the navigation needs to be emphasized a bit more. Other than that, it's perfectly organized.

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points.
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.The color choices are nice, but maybe add a button that has the colors of the site.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 8/10
Directories are becoming more and more common nowadays and, in my opinion, what sets one apart from the other is the quantity and quality of information. Your quantity of information is not much but the quality is good. Work on collecting more links so your site stands out among the rest.

Overall: 8/10
As I mentioned above, you need more links. I think the site needs a little more variety.

=90/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Lauren's Reviews

Click Here To Get Reviewed By The Awesome Lauren!!

First Impression: 14/15
The banner is definitely the first thing that caught my attention. It really is quite nice and the background matches it perfectly. I don't know if I can explain myself correctly- but the site is just calm. The light colors and peaceful lake give make it seem calm. All in all, my first impression is that the site is simple, with soft colors and not hard on the eyes.

Layout: 13/15
The two column layout for the site is good; however, I think there is slightly too much information on the left column. As for the purple headers, I think they're just a tad bit difficult to read at first glance. The different types of borders around the headers and other things, the underlining and bolding of certain words, and the mixing of colors demonstrate a good attention to detail. Maybe "Currently," shouldn't have a comma though, since the rest of the headings don't.

Content: 15/15
For a review site that just started, I think you are right on track. You have already reviewed 5 sites so far.

Organization: 13/15
Like I said previously, I think there is just a bit too much on the left column. Yet everything is easy to find and well organized into different sections. Your site seems to have all the necessary things for a review site- waiting list, rules, review form, grading scale, status and navigation (the "Report Card") (although I think it should be in a place where it is more visible, not 1/4 down the page).

Important Site Features: 10/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 2/2 points. Good, you update often.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points. Nice neomail envelope!
Counter: 2/2 points.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.Very good color variety.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 9/10
Out of the review sites that I have seen, yours is on the lighter and brighter side. Easy on the eyes and to navigate. Good work.

Overall: 9/10
There really isn't much to improve on, except keep reviewing and maybe move the "Report Card" to a more visible spot. And I think the simplicity of the name of the site is perfect.

=93/100 Points
Congratulations! Your site has won the Golden Pumpkin Award! Go ahead and get your prize!


Choco Usul Army


First Impression: 10/15
At first, I had no idea what type of site I had clicked on. The general text stands out more than the banner of the site, which was slightly difficult to read. I don't realize what the site's purpose is until I actually read the introduction. I think the purpose of the site should be evident the moment one sees it. Also, I would suggest brightening up the site more, to catch the attention of the viewer. Also, adding a bit more decoration on/around the page itself- the site looks a bit too plain.

Layout: 10/15
The layout is simple but, in my opinion, it works for the site. Sometimes, sites that don't have at least two columns are frowned upon as being too simple, but since it is not a big site, it's quite okay. You were marked down for not having a "Navigation". Even if there is not much to navigate to, this makes the site look more organized. Also, as I said above, I think it would be a good idea to brighten the page up a bit (examples: decorate the headers of the sections, add a border around the page, etc.). Also, the banner needs some major improvement; a suggestion: Make it a little bit larger and in a color that doesn't blend so much with the background so people will be able to read it better and maybe add in small letters "A Chocolate Usul Directory".

Content: 14/15
I bet Chocolate Usuls are very rare, so I won't mark you off too much for too little content. The site shows effort, both in what is written and in the content in general. I think it would take some time to "recruit" Chocolate Usuls, so good work in finding them.

Organization: 11/15
Again, I think it would be a good idea if you added a "Navigation". There is more emphasis placed upon the introduction and description of the page than the actual list of Chocolate Usuls themselves, which is the point of this directory. In fact, the first time I looked at the site for the "First Impression" portion of the review, I almost completely skipped over it. The names listed under "Soldiers" need to be organized in a way that catches the viewer's attention. I think that is the only organization error.

Important Site Features: 6/10
Down the checklist:
Credits: 2/2 points
Updates: 0/2 points. Updates let a person know if the site content is current. I suggest adding an updates section where you can state which "Soldiers" have currently been recruited or mention changes to the site.
Neomail Link: 2/2 points. The envelope stands out which is very good. I don't like hunting around for a "neomail" link.
Counter: 0/2 points. I think adding a counter lets you know how popular your site is becoming. And it's also encouraging to see the number of visitors rise every day.
Link Back Button: 2/2 points.

Spelling and Grammar: 10/10
No "misteaks" visible. Great!

Uniqueness: 10/10
First Chocolate Usul Directory I have ever seen, and I have been on this site for nearly seven years. It has its own unique place among directories.

Overall: 7/10
The site needs some improvement but the idea is good and the effort is evident, so I think that with a few little corrections and improvements, the site could totally become better and more eye-catching.

=78/100 Points
No award this time, but do not be discouraged. Your site has great potential.








NEOPETS, characters, logos, names and all related indicia
are trademarks of Neopets, Inc., © 1999-2012.
® denotes Reg. US Pat. & TM Office. All rights reserved.

PRIVACY POLICY | Safety Tips | Contact Us | About Us | Press Kit
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions