(H)CBO is back. I know, you're super excited. It's even on this page. Just click this text.
Still working on BUILD (your account) and CMM:APP, which will also be hosted on /~Kri. There will also be a snazzy new front page for anybody that mistakenly comes to the front page instead of a guide.

(harsh)crit- iquesbyolly

GRAND RE-REOPENING

Have you ever wanted a harsh critique for an application or honest opinion about a petpage, but not known where to go? Do you want a critique, but see no boards up on the PC? Have you spent hours being frustrated of being told how great a job you have done instead of being offered suggestions of what to do better? Have you ever just had a random question about the application process which you wanted answered?

Did you just answer "Yes" to any or all of the questions above? Well then, visitor, you have come to the right place!

Welcome to (Harsh) Critiques by Olly! The purpose of this petpage is to provide Neopians with a place to which they can always go to receive critiques for their work. Though originally meant to only be used for applications, (H)CBO is actually open to character-based petpages and some other sites as well. Simply read through the the rest of this page to learn how to submit your page, or look through critiques in order to shamelessly learn from the mistakes of others.

Please do not hesistate to contact me or use the services of this page; after all, what would be the point of hosting a site if nobody uses it? Feel free to explore this page (or the ones linked to on the Sitely) to your heart's content. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please read through the Information page. If it is not addressed there, feel free to contact 0llyness.

Critiques are currently OPEN

Updates
Apr 1, 2013 I've been on a mini hiatus for a while now (and working on my other sites when not), but don't worry, I'll be back soon with some great updates.

Jan 26, 2013 We have quite a few updates to make today! First and foremost, three critique requests (X) have been completed, all three for applications. We are pleased to have finally critique the favorite type of pages that we cater to. We also have a new survey (X) from one of our previously critiqued pages, and some additional content in the Extras (X) section. There is still one critique on the waitlist, but three is enough for one day. Our team of Ollies deserves a break. : )

Jan 23, 2013 Hooray for a new (and long) survey responce from one of our recent critiques! You can read it in the brand new Surveys section that our team of Ollies in charge of coding has put together. Also, we fired the Olly in charge of coding the FAQ and have changed the FAQ code back to normal. The Extras section has been updated as well and details about the helpful page elaborated. Let us know if you know of any other good helpful pages! We finally have several application critiques requested at the moment and might take a look at those tonight before heading off to bed... if not, then tomorrow seems like a good day.

Jan 23, 2013 Two new critiques have been completed and are now on the database! Sadly, neither of them is an application, so we have not critiqued our favorite type of page yet. However, we sincerely recommend that you look at those critiques and maybe even visit the pages they were made for! One again our waitlist is empty.

Jan 18, 2013 Two new surveys are up! We also have our second request for a critique and are excited to complete it.

Jan 16, 2013 Our first critique is up! It was a lovely petpage created by ephedra and can be read here. We are very pleased to have recommended this page and hope to have many more high quality pages to critique later on. Now to wait for the next request! In other news, we also have a new lister.

Jan 13, 2013 Still no requests. We're sobbing over here. We do have a new button, though!

Jan 11, 2013 The Olly in charge of updates has been fired for her failed attempt to rhyme and the Olly in charge of italicizing the date has been promoted to this new open position.

Jan 11, 2013 New listers and affiliates have come out of the blue, but still no critique requests! Whatever shall we do? For whom shall we suggest?

Jan 10, 2013 The team of Ollies in charge of this site's layout have decided to bring the updates to the top of the page and revamp the sitely section. Meanwhile, we got a gorgeous new link back button from Interstade and were listed at several directories. No requests yet, though, so our critique writers are sad.

Jan 9, 2013 Began work on bringing back (H)CBO... and then I did bring it back. WE ARE ONCE AGAIN ALIVE! Dear Applicants, fear my harshness. And and and - the Olly in charge of advertising is warning me to stop here.


welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

STYLES

Not every client has the same needs, and here at (H)CBO we understand this. For this very reason, our team of hardworking mini-Ollies has devised several different forms which a client can request.

In this section, you will have the opportunity to look through all of the different critiquing services that (H)CBO has to offer. We sincerely hope that you find a critique that suits your individual needs, and if not, then we would like to avert your attention to the ability to submit a custom form.

To navigate through them, press the links to the right of this DIV. To return to this page, simply use the Description link. Forms can be found in the Rules section.























The Classic (XCl)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance The Classic is the most popular and widely known critique that (H)CBO has to offer. With this style of critique, Olly the Original became known for her critiquing ability. It involves a read-through of your application or page with Olly's commentary throughout, breaking everything down section-for-section. This is the highest quality critique that we offer due to much experience in creating it

~

Layout Here goes Olly's impression of your layout, and commentary about it. If using a premade, she will more than likely complain (even more so if it is an overused premade). However, she often offers advice and tips if they are applicable.

Section 1 While Olly is reading through the first section of your page, she will be including her commentary in this section. This will range from comments to criticisms, and every now and then compliments. In essence, you will know what is going through a reader's head while they read your page.

Section N This will be much like Section 1, and thus the rest of the critique will continue until you run out of sections. If you have a story, it will either be skimmed through or read depending on the quality of your page (for several reasons, to be explained later).

Overall At the end of your critique, our team of Ollies will inform as to how they felt about what they just critiqued. This will include more suggestions for improvement and so forth.

Recommend? In this section, Olly the Main will say whether or not she would recommend your application or petpage to others. If you are recommended, Olly will include a short recommendation for you to put onto your page with a link back button. If not, she will offer suggestions for you to improve.

Each Classic critique will come with a link back button that will lead directly to your critique.























Simplicity (XSi)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance Simplicity is one of our newest styles, based off of the new desire that some of our clients possess for simply receiving what the critic liked and did not like about their page. Our team of hardworking Ollies read through your page and simply list what they liked and did not like about your page.

~

Likes As the section's name may suggest, this section consists of a list of what was liked in your page by Olly.
  1. e.g, The innovative use of tables as navigational tools.
  2. e.g., The combination of Georgia as a main font and Centry Gothic as the emphasis.

Dislikes This list (as suggested by the meaning of the H in (H)CBO) will often be longer than the list of Likes. Hopefully, the client will find this constructive.
  1. e.g, The icky mustard yellow and dirt brown colored scheme.
  2. e.g., How difficult it is to read the slightly darker icky mustard yellow on the slightly lighter icky mustard yellow.

Overall This section will be reserved for any commentary that Olly feels the need to make.

Recommend? Once again, Olly the Main will say whether or not she would recommend your application or petpage to others. If you are recommended, Olly will include a short recommendation for you to put onto your page with a link back button. If not, she will offer suggestions for you to improve.

Each Simplicity critique will come with a link back button that will lead directly to your critique.























Quick Skim (XQu)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance On occasion, a client comes to (H)CBO and merely wants a quick skim of their page - nothing in depth or anything, but just for somebody to read through their page (quickly) and tell them if there is anything that jumps out at them. Our team of Ollies gladly caters to this need and provides a Quick Skim service, created especially for those that are either confident enough with their pages to ask only about major errors (or anti-errors) or those that are too afraid of what they may hear in an actual critique and decide to take a softer option. We don't judge; we simply critique.

~

Layout Olly likes critiquing layouts. This is an important section for this very reason.

Commentary Unlike the other critiques, everything that is not Layout or Overall goes into only one section. This will probably be a single paragraph or so.

Overall And, as always, Olly will have some final words to say. She will reserve this section for this very purpose.

Quick Skim critiques do not have recommendations, but will come with buttons to link back to your critique.























Harshstorm (XHa)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance Every now and then, there comes a client that couldn't care less what good things they have on their page; all that they want to hear is what they can fix. These brave individuals come to (H)CBO and request the infamous Harshstorm - a critique that only cares about what is wrong with a page. This is not a kind critique, and there is no sugar coating; if our critical team of Ollies cannot find issues with a page, they are bound to complain about things that are merely not good enough. However, we challenge you, if you are truly confident, to request this style.

~

Fix This
  1. Stuff goes here. (e.g., Center DIV layouts are so boring)
  2. And here. (e.g., You should consider changing to a color scheme that actually looks nice)

Ignore This This section is reserved for final commentary.

Harshstorms do not come with recommendations, but do come with direct link back buttons.























Revisit (XRe)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance If a client has already submitted a page or application and it has been critiqued but they wish for Olly to revisit the page, they may use this style of critique. Though hardly deep at all, this critique will help the client gauge how much better (or worse) their page has gotten in our critical eyes, and possibly provide new insight as to what is recommended to be done. If one is applying for a high end pet, it is highly recommended that they time everything correctly in order to use a Revisit critique.

~

Stuff Alas, it is impossible to predict what sections will be required for a Revisit, so they are up to the discretion of your critic.

Overall Of course, Olly will have something to say at the end. She always does.

Recommendation Olly will reconsider the previously given recommendation and will provide a new (or change the old) one. It will be explained.

This critique will come with a button.























Account Check (OAc)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance Sometimes, clients do not have an application or a petpage to critique, but are instead worried about their accounts in general. For these clients, we offer an account check service, where we discuss what we feel they should work on in order to improve their accounts. These are often judged on different criteria, as there is no set way to describe what a "good" account is, but we aim to use the best criteria for the account being judged.

~

Account Stats In this section, we will judge the amount of random things that you have, and will discuss improvements. This generally refers to avatars, trophies, and things of that nature, but is not limited to these criteria.

Side Account Stats This section is reserved for anything important pertaining to your side accounts.

Pet Stats This will discuss the state of your pets, focusing primarily on what you've done for them.

Random Stats This section will change depending on whatever randomness needs to be discussed in this account check which is not covered by the other sections.

General Overview Taking place of the Overall section in the other types of critiques, here a general opinion of your accounts will be discussed, along with any final commentary.























Layout Overlook (OLa)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance If a client has coded a layout but is not sure what others think of it, they may come to us and request this style of critique. It is rather simple and quick, and thus requires very little time on our part, making them have among the quickest return times. After one of these critiques, a new critique can be requested for the actual page almost immediately.

~

Ramblings It is impossible to predict the sections required, so sections will be created as needed. The commentary will be quick, but hopefully useful to the client.
























Character Glance (OCh)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance Sometimes, a client only wants to know what we feel about the character they have created, and for such clients we offer a Character Glance survey, where we simply look over the character in question and critique it. These critiques are purely subjective, but may help in perfecting the design for a pet. However, one should not request this type of critique unless they are confident that they will not be offended.

~

Physical Design This section is for describing the physical design of the character. Be warned that we are not too fond of sparkleanimals.

Character Design This is for the personality (and everything not physical) design of the character in question. We do not support Mary Sues.

Backstory If the character in question has a backstory, it will be critiqued here. However, the story story of the pet will not be read for this type of critique.

Overall As in most sections, the overall opinion will be discussed in this section.























Custom (OCu)

Harshness

Depth

Quality
At A Glance If a client comes to us with a specific need not covered in the other styles of critique, they can request a Custom Critique, in which they specify what they require. Be aware that the ratings are random, as there is no way to gauge what the client's critique will require. Such critiques require two weeks before submission.























Form


Please be sure to read the Rules before submitting a form.

Click the box below and press Ctrl+A and then Ctrl+C, then click the Neomail Me sign below it. Find the Neomail icon, click it, and press Ctrl+V in the body of the Neomail. Ensure that the subject is (H)CBO Critique Request The different sections of the form are explained below.


Deadline (if applicable)
Date Submitted (this will help ensure that I do not leave your page lying around for two months)
Username (the one to which you would prefer your critique link sent once completed)
Your Name (the one by which you go by)
Critique Style (just the three letter code will do)
Page Style (application, petpage, or misc)
Secret Word (from the rules)
Pet Name / Type (by type, the color, species, and conversion status are referred to)
Link (/~PETNAME is preferred over a full link)
Odd Rules or Requests (if applicable; some fosters limit the amount of art/writing which applicants may include or ask certain questions... if you do not include this, how else will I know?)
Additional Notes (anything extra which you may like to add about the page, or any additional requests)























Description

Main Styles
- XCl The Classic
- XSi Simplicity
- XQu Quick Skim
- XHa Harshstorm
- XRe Revisit

Other
- OAc Account Check
- OLa Layout Overlook
- OCh Character Glance
- OCu Custom

Form (for Submission)
welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

RULES

I am harsh. I find it rather sad that I have to point this out (considering that this page is called HARSH Critiques by Olly), but there are always the people that request critiques but do not understand that I am brutally honest. I do not care if I hurt your feelings in my critique; if I find something to complain about, I will complain about it. You have been warned.

Please take into account what I say in my critique. I understand that you probably will not agree with everything and do not expect you to make every change which I suggest, but do not forget that I took time out of my day to look over your application. I ask that you respect the effort which I put into the critique by at least reading it and making some changes; not to mention that I have met plenty of people that (generally speaking) share my views on many matters.

Please only ever contact 0llyness. 0llyness is my main account, and thus the destination that I like most neomails to reach. Just because I am on a side account on a board does not mean that you are free to contact that side account; I treat side accounts as havens and requests for critiques on those accounts will simply go ignored and unanswered. If the inbox is full, you may send a junk item to the account and instead mail the account 0llykins. Please read the FAQ before submitting a question. I do try to keep it updated.

I will only critique on-site pages. This rule should be self-explanatory.

I do not use a waitlist. This leads to me having very curious timing requests, as explained below.

Please send me any applications to be critiqued at least a week before the deadline. The average critique takes me approximately half an hour to an hour to do. This may not seem like much, but if I get four applications the night before they are due, that is at least two hours of my time that I have to devote to the applications, and I cannot always guarentee this. After all, I do have a life. The secret word is harsh. Because I do not use an on-site waitlist, I will accept the first five critiques that come to me every week and put the rest on hold. If I have time, I will critique all of the applications I receive; if not, then only the first five. However, if I have a very busy week, I apologize but I might not have time to do any critiques at all.

Please fill out the appropriate form for submitting your page. This will help keep my To-Critique list organized and also ensure that everything is done in a timely manner. The form can be found above, in the Styles section.

Do not take the critique personally. Just because I did not like your ____ or insulted your ____ does not mean that I am trying to belittle you. I try to critique things without caring who the owner is, and me being harsh does not mean that I dislike you personally. Keep in mind that this is the internet, we are all pixels, and that Neopets is a game.

I will not critique major works in progress, deal with chatspeak or an overload of smilies, or put up with last-minute requests. On the other hand, I would appreciate you using a link back button on your page but understand if you would prefer not to. I will probably not look over your accounts unless requested, sorry, but feel free to make this request in the Other section on the form.



welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

CRITIQUES

ACl 1.26 Alex
ACl 1.26 Amly
ACl 1.26 Olivia
PCl 1.23 Tango
PCl 1.23 Bookkeeper
PCl 1.16 Solo
Older
Legend








This is where older critiques go. There aren't any right now.
Current
Legend

Petpage
Recommended Petpage
Application
Recommended Application
Other

If the name of a pagehost is too long to fit on the side bar, the letters from the end will be removed. The permanent link, however, remains the same. Critiques are organized by month. Older months can be found in the Older section.

Press the link for Legend at any time to return to this page.







































/~SAMPLE
username | critique style | date
This works. Don't forget linkback.





















/~NAMADAEUS
sacrifyce | classic application | 1.26.2013


Application For
Dalir the Converted Skunk Draik (to be Repainted)

Layout
I really, really, really love the layout. It's gorgeous and I adore the amount of detail in the background. Granted, I have a black bar at the bottom because I keep my Taskbar on the left side of my screen, but that didn't bother me too much. Granted, it did bother me, but I can't really think of an easy way for you to fix it (unless you make the text area a part of the DIV, remove the rocks and make them a seperate floating layer, and then - well, complicated. I'll deal with it for now. It'd recommend you fix this if you are chosen to adopt, though. Good headers. Nav would be nice. Good color scheme. Readable (always a plus). Very very very pretty.

Welcome
Remove the smilies. All of them. Formalize your diction. All of it. I'll probably repeat that multiple times by the looks of it. Alexandria is hardly a mouthful (so you should say Alex for short). Why did you put your about me into the introduction? Your introduction should introduce the application as a whole and the pet, not be a why you chose to make an application and a real life about you. You should have something that grips the reader's attention, like something that relates the page to the cave I'm currently looking at or some quote the character is saying or something. Remove the about you and why you chose to make an application entirely from the introduction. It doesn't belong there. Really. Furthermore, that's too short to be an About You if that was your intention. I don't see an overload of text while skimming this application. Change this so that it actually grabs my introduction. Maybe I meet Dalir here? Maybe it's in a dark and creepy cave? Just listing some ideas. And, um, yeah. Hi I'm APPLICANT and this is my application for PETNAME style introductions went out of fashion quite some time ago.

A Note
Your sections are not in a standard order. I would recommend: Introduction, Character, Story, Plans, About You, Your Pets, Whys, Fin. There is no point of describing why you're the perfect applicant or why Dalir is the perfect pet for you if the reader hasn't read the application yet.

Why Dalir
Draiks aren't that rare anymore now that a month of Habitarium can earn one and none of the reasons you name are particularly unique. To summarize this section in a sentence, you wish to adopt Dalir because he is a well-named Draik. Why not apply for Miff, Ysira, Vitally, Organs, Koizon, or any of the other draiks up for adoption? What makes Dalir truly special? How did it inspire the character? If you cannot describe why you want this specific Draik, I would recommend removing this section.

Why Me
I personally hate these sections, so pardon me if I tear yours apart. Nobody cares if your pets are joyful; it's not hard to making it delightful either. You should link to all the work you do. Mention how many BC trophies you have. The contest doesn't really like anthro art, and it's not like BCing takes out of creating petpages. I still don't see anything super special that nobody else does for their pets. Granted, my standards are set incredibly hard since I'm friends with people that spoil their pets too much, but what you've written so far seems standard. Keeping a pet delighted takes playing with a toy every now and then, while working on petpages and BCing is stuff that most applicants promise. As for the comment that you spoil your pets waaaay too much... Do you have thousands of dollars of Neocash? Some do. Do you have full rows of trophies for some of your pets? Some do. Do you have petpets and petpetpets that cost millions? Some do. And so forth. Anyway, my point is that just saying that you spoil your pets is very subjective; it depends on what the person considers spoiling - a true BDer might not care about character petpages but would care about stats. I'm not saying that you're not a good owner; all I am complaining about is the phrase. You (probably) don't know what the other applicants do - maybe they do some of these things. Maybe the foster does. Furthermore, you offer no proof of your intentions; I don't see any links to petpages or beauty contest trophies. Basically, remove this section and put that very same enthusiasm into the section you'll later have for plans. If you must keep this section, move it to the end, so that I actually know what you do to your pets before I read it.

It Begins
I love the story. Very well written and a good length. I also adore the picures that break it from being a single block of text. You have a good writing style. : )

Who am I?
Isn't the I in your application you? So shouldn't this be called Who is Dalir?. Change the first Legend says in the first full paragraph of the personality to Legend has it. Better phrase. I'm quite sure he had parents, so perhaps change if he had parents... to if he had parents he knew.... Very well written section. As stated before, moving the Whys to the end would have been better - you would seem less pretentious if a reader would have read this pt first. I don't have much to complain about here, other than maybe suggesting that you change up sentence and paragraph structure a bit. There's a fine line between rhythm and repitition and you're a toe away from it.

Random Facts
You should look into human echolocation and consider adding it to your character. It's really awesome - this one guy learned how to feel the reflections of sound waves using tongue clicks... and could easily fit into the heightened senses from the loss of sight. Once again, well written. I feel like you should have mentioned the petpet by adding a section in the character section, though. The character's motivations are easily understood by the reader, which adds a sense of realism and makes everything much better.

Artwork
You have gorgeous art, by the way. You need to put the customization in a future plans section. I see a bit of a crosspaint in there. You should submit Dalir to WCPPN if you're chosen and once you're finished. In these plans, you should include everything from the proposed petlookup and customization/paint to planned petpet and promises of BC trophies and petpage. Basically, all the things you said that weren't about you in your Why sections.

Meet the Family
That's actually not that many permanent pets. Once again, you need a seperate About Me section. In that About Me section, you'll talk about what you like to do in Neopia, how many BC trophies you have, your reasons for still being in Neopets, links to your art page, and some things about you in real life. Back to this section. You should include how Dalir will meet most of these characters, even if it's only a short sentence or several words. Possibly write if they will be friends or foes? Also, be sure to link to petlookups in addition to petpages and any notable details (like if they have BC trophies). Otherwise, well-written.

Goodbyes
Make it character related.

Overall
As a petpage, this page would be gorgeous. As an application, it is decent as best. You show clear skill at the making of petpages - that much is undeniable. However, you should show this skill off at the beginning of the page, before the Whys. Furthermore, this application is in dire need of organized About You and Plans sections. If you add those, the end result will be gorgeous. I know I got a little harsh at the beginning of the critique, but there is so much potential in this application... you're clearly a good owner and if you improve the application sections of this application, I would be confident in saying that you will chosen to adopt Dalir (as long as the foster chooses based on effort, application, or normal things like that).

Recommendation?
If this was a petpage, I would recommend you without a moment of hesitation; it's an amazing character based page. However, as the application portions are weak, I cannot do so yet. However, I am confident that you can improve this application in the short time until the deadline and make it a splendid work of art.



Survey Response
None.




















/~COLU
driftingmist | classic application | 1.26.2013


Application For
Skeletal the Converted Mutant Draik

Layout
I adore the layout image, but the text area kind of ruins it for me. Make the background be somewhat transparent and lighter, maybe a light green? That way, you could use darker text and it would be more readable. Also, I would recommend making the text size one bigger. The box is just... a floating, ugly green box that's on top of an otherwise gorgeous background. I would change the background to a 50% opacity white or light green (not neon, light) and make the text be a dark green. Also, make the headers larger and more "decorative". Your page is image-based, not CSS-based, so you should have your CSS complement the image and not vice versa. Also, format the text justified with the text-align:justify; code in your DIV rather than centered. it'll look nicer. Most people use italics to show spoken text because of the issues Neocoding has with quotation marks; I would recommend this as wel for you. But really. Please change the background of the text area to something pretty (by which I mean semi-transparent).

Welcome
I normally dislike anything where the reader is being spoken to, but this works. Good introduction, but I would set the tone more by describing the setting. The quotation mark at the beginning of the text went poof because of the quirks of coding on Neopets, so change spoken text to italics. Describe the forest and stuff. Write more. Otherwise fine.

History
The image has him playing a harp/lyre, but a cello. Just saying. I typically skim stories, but I actually read this one. I enjoyed it - great story. Good job. I like how important the music is. Um, yeah. Moving on.

About his character
Unnecessary section. Move the content to the end of the character section. Spell out words like application instead of app. Don't start sentences with words like and or but since that makes them fragments. Your sentences all sound the same. A lot of them start with I so try to move their phrasing around. For example, Zale means Sea-strength. I didn't get a chance to explain this yet, but I plan to incorporate it into his character. can become Zale means sea strength, something that I have not yet had the chance to incorporate into his character but have every intention to later on. See how much nicer that sounds? Try playing with the sentences for this entire section. It would be better to try to add something about sea strength though.

Character Profile
I can barely read the text. Add more. Add a paragraph about his personality, briefly describe the stages of his life, describe what happens with each nickname, and such. This is your place to shine, seeing as you have such a complex character and all. Also, include hex codes for colors to make it easier for people that might want to make fan art to do so. Basically, elaborate on this. Make it longerrrr.

A Little About Me
You weren't kidding about the word little. Spell out words like Neopets, Pound Chat, and Beauty Contest. Remove the first sentence - About Mes are common for applications. You use dork twice in this section, so change one of them. Mention how many pets you have gifted an Beauty Contest trophies you have recieved. Link to your accounts instead of just mentioning them. Don't make excuses for not having work up for your pets; instead, focus on what you have. Don't put your planned account for Skeletal in this section. This section didn't quite sell you. This section should tell the foster why you are an awesome owner. Do you collect anything? Talk about it. Do you like to play games? Talk about it. Are you a NC comic star? Talk about it. Do you have any sites that help people? Talk about it. Do you chat on a particular board? Talk about it. Talk about the pets you've zapped, everything. This is your place to show the foster that you're an awesome Neopian.

Plans

Formalize your diction. This is an application, not you hanging out and chatting on a board. So, if the foster doesn't choose you for Skeletal, will you pound Sen or something? You really shouldn't use applications to show off that you don't have plans for a permanent pet... Do a spell check (summary is spelled summary and not summery) (yes I know I make a lot of spelling errors but I'm critiquing, not applying). Remove the roleplay section entirely. Fosters rarely cared and do so even less now. You should make the petlookups now, at least for the pet that you already own. Sen not having anything could make the foster fear that Skeletal won't have anything either. I would really put up her parallel character now rather than later. How many BC trophies do you have? Have you ever placed in Draik? Draik is the most difficult one to place in, you know. I checked your accounts and don't see any trophies on your Draik or Lupes, so I'm sorry to say this but if I were a foster I would disregard that plan entirely. Everybody promises to BC every pet they apply for, but most never try and those that do don't always place... especially in Draik. Whenever I promise to BC pets in my applications, I always link to the pets of mine that have trophies. Don't you have a design for Skel that I would be looking at? Anyway. About this section. I really, really do not recommend you mentioning how little you have for Sen. Instead, focus on Skeletal but mention that he will have a parallel, citing Sen. Also, have something up for her. You can make the petlookup and screenie or keep it on a lab rat or something to show that you are seriously about that plan.

Meet the Family
You should include all of your pets to show how much you do for each of them. Also, remove the smiley. Link to their petpages and mention if they have anything notable (BC trophies, full petpage, etc). Why are some of the headers with background and some without? Try to write the same amount about each character and perhaps write about some kind of interaction they would have with Skeletal.

Farewell
... really? You're ending it like that? Try to make your fin match your introduction. Have Skeletal be saying goodbye to the reader or something and cut out the part you currently have, since it's what every applicant has.

Overall
Decent application, but it's just so short. I feel that you need to elaborate on every single section that you currently have. You didn't sell yourself well in this application - I didn't come out of there feeling that you're the best possible owner (even though I didn't read any other applications for this pet yet). Just add more. The ugliness of the text area never did stop bothering me, though. Overall, good start, but needs work.

Recommendation?
Because I am incredibly picky about recommending applications, I apologize but I cannot recommend you. This does not mean that your application was bad; it just was not the most spectacular application that I have read in the past several months. Regardless, I wish you all the best and sincerely hope that you will be chosen.



Survey Response
None.




















/~XWEE789___
xxcutexbunnyxx | classic application | 1.26.2013


Application For
Beethoven the Converted Darigan Hissi

Notes from Requester
The owner preferred us to go off of the character she had in mind.

Layout
Reading the text of your application hurts my eyes a bit. At least it's not pure white on black, but it's still slightly annoying... especially since there is no actual border around the text area. I feel that your layout would be a lot neater if you added some kind of distinction between the area where the text is and the rest of the page... maybe even a light colored background to the text area and change the text to dark? Regardless, you need a background for the text area to make the page look more organized. Also, I feel that a slightly patterned background will be less dull than just a plain color. I can't say I'm fond of the back-area to the navigation either; I initially thought that they were books but now realize that they are some kind of wood? Furthermore, the colors don't match the dark grey and light grey theme of the page. Your navigation colors should highlight those of your page. I'd recommend you creating a navigation that matches the page, not choosing a random image from a search engine and adding a navigation to that. You also have too many highlight fonts - you should use the same decorative font in all of the places where you have a decorative font. For example, either use the one you use for subheaders or use the one for navigation. Personally, I would recommend the navigation one, since your page doesn't exactly match the one you use for subheaders. Anyway. Moving on.

Introductory Page
This section is going to be a bit of a personal tangent. Most fosters don't think like I do on this topic, but some do. Basically, when I see your introductory page, my first thought is that you're hiding a blank page or something behind it. It's not like the introductory page will be up if/when you get chosen, so it feels like you're hiding something. The alternative (and option that I prefer) would be to modify the coding with full page DIVs... but that's a bit complicated. Keep it if you like it; most people don't mind. : )

Introduction
I understand that you the serial killer design was requested by the foster, but I would recommend that you try to make a bit more subtle. TNT could get mad at you if you're too open with the design. That's why brutal and gruesome designs are often toned down. Putting that aside, good introduction. I appreciate the lack of any traditional introduction. However, I would recommend setting the scene of the night and woods more to get the reader's attention even more - for example, maybe comment on how peaceful the cool autumn night was and how the animals were ignorant (though that's a bad word)?

Character
Change the occupation to Fugutive and add a section for Crime with Serial Killer put in. Do you have a ref later? If not, you need one.

In the first sentence, you use musician too much. Consider changing it to When Beethoven was younger, his parents urged him to become a great musician, in honor of his famed namesake. Don't start sentences with and - it's a fragment and the literary technique you tried to do there didn't work. Perhaps change the period at the end of the sentence I suggested to a semi-colon and add so he did at the end? I highly doubt any father would murder the mother of his child right in front of his child unless he was already in an abusive home, and that had not been implied at the beginning. In the third paragraph, repeating that phrase seems off. Perhaps change it to on the night his mother died? You fail to mention why... readers such as myself are sad when such details are left out. Also, if he was truly a good piano player, he would be playing it daily rather than once a month. Anybody that has true musical talent practices often, since they feel their skills deteriorating. But that all might be me overthinking everything too much.

I like the explanation of character traits, but throw in one random one to keep it from being too cliche. Also, look into psychopaths and sociopaths and pick which one he is, since the list you mentioned is a mixture of both and such people tend to not exist. Basically, I'd recommend making him into the former to make the piano stick, but in that case he'd be overconfident. I know I'm being picky, but making characters feel real to the reader helps applications shine.

Moving onward_ .. How is he a normal 18 year old boy if his skin is gray/purple? My skin is tan... I've seen white, pink, tan, brown, and every hue inbetween, but I've never seen purple... clearly he's not a normal human boy. Maybe say he's a normal 18 year old reptillian boy? Better yet, create a species for anthro hissi. Especially if his skin is cold - humans have warm skin, you know. It comes with being warmblooded. His skin is a shade of purple, by the way, not a shade of grey. I would recommend adding a hex code reference for every color (like white is #ffffff and stuff) and also adding a ref. This makes it easier for other people to understand the colors we're discussing. Plus, the hex codes can serve as a color scheme for the page (as prevously mentioned). People's eye colors have nothing to do with the blood they see. If they did, my albino buddy would be a vampire (at least I hope they're not). Cute phrase, but maybe instead put something like Perhaps Fate had predicted his future occupation instead. Something like, not exactly (unless you like that phrase haha). Never say pretty much the same color. This is why you should add hex codes for colors. Pick either hood or cape (I believe they're called a cloak when put together) instead of putting hood/cape each time. Also, you start almost every sentence (and every paragraph) in that section with either Beethoven or His. Either change it to a list format using ul li codes or mess with sentence structure. As a matter of fact, do that for the trait section as well. You need more variety. Add in some non-cliche things too, though. Maybe he likes oranges?

Story

Make the textboxes wider - same width as the rest of the layout. Also, write a tad bit more so that there's an actual reason for them to scroll. Always write at least double the scroll (though I would recommend over triple). I would also recommend keeping it to Beethoven music rather than Rihanna. I don't get the purpose of the first part. Stories need several sections - beginning, climax, and resolution. I only see a description of a scene? Also, is Beethoven I in this? If so, make that clear somehow since he hasn't been the narrator for the rest of the page. Those look more like journal entries than stories... I would recommend changing it to journal entries or something. Why is the the third story suddenly third person? Choose a point of view and stick with it (throughout the page). Uh yeah. There kind of go no where since they're not remotely stories and have weird point of views. Them as snippets of journal entries would be cool, though.

Plans
Burn the smiley. Remove the note. Fosters generally lurk accounts of applicants they consider whether they're free to or not. I feel like adding an account check so I will after I finish critiquing this page. By the way, good order for your application - it's my personal favorite order. Don't bold or italicize random parts of sentences. Make your paragraphs longer. It's great that he's a skeleton now and that you plan on improving it, but most people promise that and never actually improve it. This would be a great place to link to full characters or petpages that you have... if you have any. Combine the minigraph with the story plan with the one where you plan on providing a character. You seem to have a character already, though. If you change the story to journal entries, you could promise to add backstory to each journal entry. : ) Never insult your art skills. Link to your art doesn't work. Add more art of him in this application itself. as I'm one heck of a lazy person XD I wouldn't choose you because of that phrase alone. Instead say something like I adore this layout, so it will probably remain as his petpage layout. I plan to change it eventually, but I tend to be slow as I work on most of my pets at once. See how I magically removed the negative connotation from that? You can make the petlookup and screenie it, you know. That's what most applicants do. Or they put it up on some non-permie pet. Remove the part about not being a fan of customization. Remove the part about your wallet and Neocash. Say something about how you love playing with Neopoint items because you like proving that pets can be just as nice as without Neocash. Remove the drag and drop part - I can see it clearly without that. Change the centerring of the explanation to justified like the rest of the page and fuse the two paragraphs. Might I recommend adding that one stake? Pretty customization, by the way. Change if I do adopt Beethoven to something like if I am honored to be chosen to adopt Beethoven. To be honest it wouldn't hurt for you to formalize your diction everywhere in this app. Mention at the end that him being on your side doesn't mean he's not loved or something. You completely forgot about petpets, by the way. Petpets make fosters happy.

Who are you?
You're asking me who I am? I don't get it. The point of this page this entire time has been you, so this section would best be titled Who am I?. Burn the smilies. Talk about your current pets and list your permies. I'm currently in the process of adopting out many of my pets who I don't pay much attention to anymore. As a foster, I would read that section as I get tired of my old pets and like to replace them. Change it to something about how you feel bad for having pets that people would adore that you don't appreciate much anymore or impulsed or something and include a link to your up for adoption page (unless you do board adoptions, I guess). Or since you just came back from hiatus (remove the quitting part), you want to reprioritize your pets and keep only the ones you truly care about. You don't try to come online daily - you do come online daily. What's with the Otaku thing? Random and unnecessary.

Add more to this section. It should sell you as a great owner, not just hi i'm olly and i like da pc and here are my accounts and offline i'm quirky. Believe me, I hate writing About Mes as much as the next person, but you might as well get used to them since you'll be doing them for everything from college apps to grad school apps to job apps to cover letters and so forth. They should tell the foster why you are an awesome owner. Do you collect anything? Talk about it. Do you like to play games? Talk about it. Are you a NC comic star? Talk about it. Do you have any sites that help people? Talk about it. So I glanced at your main and understand your issue. You don't even have all of the clickables and haven't done the altador plot... and don't seem to participate in site stuff. In that case, talk about how much you work on your pets (and link to it), introduce your pets, talk about how you like Cybunnies but want some variation as well, talk about what you like to do on the PC, and so forth. Meanwhile, go get all the clickable avatars. For the offsite, make a joke or something about why you keep it short. I used to claim that I live in a cardboard box equipped with wifi and that that was all they needed to know about me (and then Ollykad began to live in said cardboard box for the Kadventures). Basically, make this section longer, and turn it into a Why you (without it actually being a why you).

Why
I hate this section. There was a brief time three years ago when they went out of fashion. Man I miss those days. Anyway. Decent enough why, but I'd throw in something about why he's not a cybunny (since you seem to like them cys). Remove the why you. Move the part about Beethoven being a character to the why him, though.

Extras
Oh neogod. Please remove the GIFs. They make your application appear so incredibly unprofessional and earn you nothing. If you must keep them, make them smaller - they take up half of the scrollbar of your app (and people notice stuff like this that's meant to take up space). But really. I mean, this is you walking into a job interview wearing your pajamas.

Art should be it's own section. Actually use that piece of art drawn for you - I'd go as far as recommending you use it as the main art for the application.

Farewell
Decent section. Keep it. Burn the smiley though.

Account Check
I'm just going to glance at your main. Get to 100 avatars (not hard, there are 86 clickables and at least 14 really really cheap ones). Remove that thing about your neofamily being complete (you're applying for a pet, so it's clearly not). Remove the thing about none of them being UFT/A since you stated some are UFA. And um yeah...

Overall
This was a decent application, especially in the beginning. However, from your story until the the end of the GIFs, I was not impressed. You clearly have a good character in mind, but do not sell yourself well enough as an owner.

Recommendation?
Because I am much pickier with recommending applications than petpages, I apologize, but I cannot recommend this application. Formalize your diction, fix up this layout, make the About Me better, remove the GIFs and smilies, and then this application will be a lot better, but it has a long way to go from being the perfect application. Regardless, I wish you luck in being chosen and sincerely hope you will be.



Survey Response
None.




















/~IREC
_stars_of_chaos_ | classic petpage | 1.23.2013


Notes from Requester
This was an old application that I am revamping to fit my pet. As a result, the name on the reference image is outdated and the petpet information is slightly off (species).

Layout
The page is incredibly slow to use because of how heavy the background is. Do not change it, but make it be fixed rather than scroll. This will make the page significantly lighter and easier to read than it currently is (since it lags quite a bit every time I scroll). Also, center formatting gets really really annoying in walls of text; use text-align:justify; to make it look nicer and easier to read. I talso think you might need to add some more padding to the edge of the DIV. Make the flower on the right link to the top or something (or petlookup...petlookup seems like a better idea). That way, it won't be awkwardly hanging out there and will have a purpose. Maybe add a nav on the roots of the tree? Otherwise, I like the layout. It's just a bit heavy and lacks a nav.

The Shadow of the Wind
Man scrolling is slow. It makes my entire browser lag. Definitely make the BG lighter. Just to warn you, I generally do not do grammar critiques (in case you haven't noticed the millions of typos I make while typing up critiques in Notepad). However, I will comment on some things that jump out at me. I would move More beautiful, however, were the gardens. to the beginning of the next paragraph, since the next paragraph is about them and begins awkwardly. Good descriptions. May I help you? is missing the front quotation mark because of a coding issue on Neo. I would recommend just italicizing spoken text instead. Man, even highlighting to copy-paste is slow because of the background. The third to last paragraph of this section suddenly becomes present tense for a bit. This is awkward. Fix it. Overall, relatively interesting.

Introductions
Once again, quotation mark issue. Seriously, just italicize. It's easier and people have come to terms with the fact that that is how Neopets stuff is often coded. I find I have lived here for only a short time, a few years at most, yet they blend together. awkward because one would assume that years blend together. I don't know. I don't like the yet. Again you switch to present tense; generally speaking, it's best to hang out in one tense during any form of creative work. Relatively good introduction to what the page will include.

Into the Forest, Fireflies, Rest of Story
And now everything becomes italicized? It's a bit hard to read; if you're going to do this, make the font slightly bigger. However, I would recommend changing the color of the text instead of forcing everything to be italicized since this will be going on for a while. Reading the story. It'd be more interesting if Irec was telling it, but it's okay the way you put it. You used Into the Forest twice as a header. Overall, relatively interesting story. As stated, I hate being a grammar checker and no major things jumped out at me. Some sentences seemed awkwardand could use some commas though (especially the longer ones that have few of them). Otherwise, nothing seems off. You have a nice writing style. Once again, I am going to complain about the heaviness of the page, because it makes scrolling almost impossible for me (and I linked several of my online friends to it - they're experiencing lag as well). Very nice stories though, they make me get to know the character better. However, I might be old fashioned, but it would have been nice to have seen a character section before we jumped into the stories. It would just act as a good preface of what was to come. You definitely need a ref to help readers navigate the many sections, though.

Meet Irec
Move this section wayyyy up. Finish the ref sheet. Center the ref sheet and don't start the description next to it. Add two breaks between sections - it keeps it from being too much of a wall of text. I would highly, highly recommend adding a section like the petpet as well; many people consider this too much, but it adds a nice little bit to pages. Also, make a seperate art section. At the end, include a sort of sitely section and some links; I'll gladly link exchange with you with my lupes if you would like.

Missing Sections / Section Order
Your page would be better if it looked something more like this: Introduction, Meet Irec, Stories, Maybe random sections between stories (art, adoptables, petpet profile) to break the walls of text, and then a fin. More people would be inclines to read it rather than be scared off by the rather frightening walls of text. Many people, fosters included, often hate to read stories. Furthermore, it would change the page from being monotonous by adding new and fun things. Even random sections (like favorite things) would be fun.

Overall
This page demonstrates spectacular writing. Granted, I got very, very tired of reading the italics after a while and the laggy scrolling never stopped bothering me, but the writing made up for it. Most of my complaints are mainly with formatting and orderring, not with the content itself. Wonderful page. : )

Recommendation?
I was debating this the entire time that I was reading your page. On the one hand, the writing is in fact spectacular, whereas on the other, the page consists of a very laggy and virtually impossible to scroll wall of text. Many people dislike reading stories, so this is something to consider. Furthermore, the page ends rather... abruptly. However, at the same time, I can see the amount of effort that you put into the page, and it came out relatively nicely. With this in mind, I will make you a deal: I will recommend you right now as long as you promise to make the background not scroll and thus make the page lighter and easier to read. If there is only one thing you change, that has to be it.

Your recommendaton reads as follows:

Tango had /~Irec critiqued by Olly at (H)CBO on /~kri#HCBO on January 23th, 2013. This page was deemed recommended due to the wonderful storyline and style of writing displayed. Tango has demonstrated high levels of writing ability and a talent for storymaking. The staff at (H)CBO believes that this page should be read by people interested in creating writing long stories for their pets as an example of a high quality work.



Survey Response
My critique was /~Irec on 1/23/13. This was my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it was quite apparent that Olly had spent an amazing amount of effort in wiring it and gave me precisely what I was looking for. The critique was very in-depth, precisely as it was advertised, and provided constructive criticism in all of the areas that I requested. I felt that Olly was just harsh enough, though I wouldn't have minded harsher, during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it quite helpful and entertaining, and would recommend that she ramble the same amount. As for the site itself, I was satisfied with the layout (though the frequently asked questions do not work on my browser). Overall, I would say that I was very satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, but would recommend that Olly change the FAQ section. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends. My additional comments are as follows. The critique was submitted only two days before I received a response, which is remarkably quick given how long critiques take to write and the fact that it was a weekday. Olly was very helpful, polite, and provided exactly what she claimed to with a little added entertainment thrown in to boot. Her critiques are thorough, thoughtful, and very honest. Anyone who is looking for help should look no further than this page. I'd like to thank you personally for your help. You provided me with exactly what I needed and I'll get started on making those changes. Bravo to you, and thank you again! -Tango




















/~BANAMEIN
seahorsepond | classic petpage | 01.23.2013


Forward Note
I will be entirely honest with you - I do not know what kind of quality of a critique I will be able to provide for this page, seeing as it is unconventional. However, I look forward to reading through it and trying! It always makes me happy to see unique concepts in character-based petpages, and I surely was not expecting to see a mostly comic one like this.

Layout
There is not anything wrong with the layout per se, but it is quite boring. Black and white with a stripe of red is a bit dull, to be honest. I would recommend you add a dark pattered background instead, such as one from Subtle Patterns or Colourlovers. Also, I would get rid of the bar at the top and add some sort of navigation. If possible, maybe even move the ordering? Like start with the image or poem and then put the pet's name? The image can easily be turned into a header. At least the layout is readable. : )

Comics
My first suggestion would be to actually create a seperate Meet the Characters section and put it in front of the comics. In this section, elaborate on the characters - add the tiny "profile" section, likes and dislikes, maybe a catchphrase, and a link to petlookups if they are based on pets. This could help potential readers get to know the characters before they even begin reading the comics.

Another formatting suggestion just came to me. By my understanding, some of these comics are continuations of the same strip. I originally thought that the text explained the comics, but now see that it is simply your commentary. I would, in this case, recommend hiding the text so that it only comes out when the image is hovered over (just add a title= code to the image's URL, like in the button below) and put your commentary in there. You can even include a phrase at the beginning talking about how your commentary can be seen if the images are hovered over. Furthermore, move the welcome to before the first comic. Above each strip, include a short title (Like New Butler) and at the end of the page you can even make an index of them. Or at the beginning. Your choice. That way, it would be more like the professional webcomics that you find elsewhere.

Moving on. Try to change the ordering around so that they're at least somewhat chronological (if they have chronological aspects); for example, the Thank you for Hiring Me one should be closer to the top. I love the ones where the comics go around screenies. Also, try to mess with the contrast on the comics to make the backgrounds white. They'd look nicer. Yeah, I'm really liking the caption-on-hover-and-title-before idea. It would look much more professional haha. I love the almost too quiet one. Cutting hair is just like reaping souls, right? Yes. You should introduce side characters too, in the beginning. You can label them as side characters too. You need more comics. Just saying. That was too quick and I want to read more haha. I enjoyed them - funny and had character.

Questions and Answers
Justify your text (text-align:justify; in the coding) to make it look neater. He could be Plushie too, instead of Zombie... though that would be a little cliche. Good questions; nice comic relief (though the entire page is comic relief). Maybe Banamein should answer them, though, since this is his page? Or he could add to your answers?

Neomails
I like how you add captions to those. Move this section to be above the FAQ, perhaps, since it still includes comics? Very nice idea, though. I enjoyed reading these. : )

Artworks
Good ref. Make the art below it bigger but resize the art in the fan art box to make it always fit. I like the commentary.

Random Things
You could move the comic to right below the uncolored one and put that in the caption. Adoptables sort of count as fan art. So, in essence, this section can be removed. : )

Overall
The comics were great and I really enjoyed reading this page. Most of my recommendations were primarily about formatting since that is, in my opinion, the only thing that can really be improvered (other than adding more comics). I would even go as far as recommending a more "click through" layout but that would be complicated to code. Regardless, this is a really creative and fun page. Keep comiccing!

Recommend?
Due to the creative nature of this page, I feel confident in providing my recommendation for others to visit it. This page shows people how character-based petpages do not need to have the traditional format, and thus I feel that it deserves to be recognized for all of the work and effort that you put in.

Your actual recommendation reads as follows:

Bookkeeper had /~Banamein critiqued by Olly at (H)CBO on /~kri#HCBO on January 23th, 2013. This page was deemed recommended due to the creativity and effort displayed in the comics. Bookkeeper has demonstrated high levels of comic-making and has created a lovable but slightly disturbing character that readers will adore reading about. The staff at (H)CBO believes that this page should be read by people interested in creating untraditional character pages or comics about their pets as an example of a high quality work.



Survey Response
My critique was /~Banamein on 1.23.13. This was my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it let me know how others see my page and it offered suggestions on how to improve. I felt that Olly was just right during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it entertainingly helpful, and would recommend that she ramble the same amount. As for the site itself, I was satisfied the layout (thanks for fixing the F.A.Q.!). Overall, I would say that I was satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, and would recommend that Olly give herself a pat on the back. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends, my petpage stalkers, and random people I meet on the street. My additional comments are: Thanks so much for critiquing my nontraditional page, it's great to know what's working, and what's not. Also, I'm not exactly a coding wiz, so I really appreciated your tips about justifying text and adding titles to images. Can't wait to get working on my page again! ~Bookkeeper





















/~DEVICLOUD
ephedra | classic petpage | 1.16.2013


Forward Note Solo, you would be the first to request a critique. Regardless, I am happy that you did, as I always adore your petpages. Regardless, thank you for being the first of (hopefully) many people that come to me for critiques! Also, for all of the readers that will inevitably come here and ask why I was not harsh, I would like to inform you that I have always been an admirer of Solo's work and thus will not find much to complain about. Furthermore, I tend to be nicer on character petpages than applications.

Layout I like the color scheme you chose; I cannot say that I see green and purple together often in favorable light, but it looks nice here. The purple bar at the top adds just enough to keep it from being a boring image next to a text area. My sole recommendation would be to add a navigation of some sort - perhaps on the purple bar above the image in a semi-transparent way? Also, maybe try making the petname a dark shade of purpose rather than black? Otherwise, no complaints.

Introduction Gorgeous lyrics; they set the tone for reading the page very well. Beginning the tale by using the animals also works quite well; at least, it is not they type of introduction that one sees very often. I would change ( to each other ) to ( to one another ) in paragraph two. In paragraph 4, split the sentence beginning with ( He was interrupted ) into two, perhaps simply by removing the ( and ) and splitting it there. Very good ending to this section; it leaves a good ring.

Story The main team of Ollies normally refuses to read stories, choosing to skim them instead, but fine we'll read it. The Nature of Angels. Good use of quotes at the beginning of the section; I always love things like that. ( The blah to blah ) is a very lovely sentence indeed. Perhaps try ( The feeder to the food ) (which is still awkward) or ( The member to the herd/pack )? Interesting shift to first person. Change ( only ) in ( Our only duty is to the truth ) to ( sole ). The paragraph where this is is a little awkward... maybe try listing without the use of periods and with a hyphen or colon? Perhaps try something like this - ( Our sole duty is to the truth. If our actions seem cruel or insensitive, it is only because we see things that no other being can - the past, the present, and the future; the futures that never will come to fruition, whether by our mistakes or those of others. A pure angel is the most perfect, beautiful entity that can exist, and, yet, an angel is only pure when he does not yet exist. ) Still not perfect, but idunno. Good ending to the first section. The Fall. You use fault several times in the first paragraph; perhaps change ( For all my faults ) to ( For all my flaws )? The description of the physical realm, it being full of half-truths and such, was wonderful. Nice sentence structure. Quite fascinating how he became a Creator and thus stopped being an angel; nice twist. Life on Earth. Oh my. The Lincoln quote. I may or may not have had to stop critiquing for several minutes while I laughed... and half of the team of Ollies that critique may or may not still be laughing. Great description of gravity and pressure. I like the sentence you starred. No, bad. No to be continued, write it nowwww. Overall, good story. I like how you wrote it and the sections you chose - not too long and not too short.

Profile Short, but sweet. Perhaps add hex color numbers for things all of the colors? Now, this might just be my pickiness and harshness coming through for once, but I don't like how the Curse Markings thingy takes up the entire line whereas none of the other thingies do. Maybe move it down to below fur? Also, move the Animal Species up to maybe right below Entity... and maybe order stuff Name Friends Entity Animal Species Gender Height Fur Hair Eyes Markings? Brahman better be a buddy as well when I finally morph him and work on his page. Add ( relatively ) before ( new to the physical realm ). I don't like structure of the second paragraph... Maybe change ( So it is in large part due to this that he feels ) to ( In no small part due to this, he feels )?

Art, Fanart, Adoptables Pretty. Maybe add hover-over titles to add a caption?

Link Out I feel like there is an outro missing from this page. Like, maybe something that the anaconda and orangutan say... or a storyteller ending. I'm not quite sure, but it ends rather abruptly. Also, change the height and width of the textarea to match that of the button /picky.

Overall Good page. Soloesque quality never fails to be nice to read. I'd write more here, but this page isn't complete yet so there isn't much for me to complain about. Basically, add a navigation, finish the story, and add an outro and you'll be fine.

Recommended? Despite this page having the ring of being incomplete, I will recommend this petpage. The character is complex and the everything currently on the page, from art to writing to layout, if of very high quality. I feel that this page, in its current state, can serve as a good example of how work in progress pages can be gorgeous, whereas when you finish I am certain that the page will be outstanding.

Your actual recommendation is as follows:

Solo had /~devicloud critiqued by Olly at (H)CBO on /~kri#HCBO on January 16th, 2013. This page was deemed recommended due to the complexity of the character and quality of the work displayed. Solo has demonstrated high levels of skill and talent in creating both a character and world despite the limitations of Neopets. The staff at (H)CBO believes that this page should be read by people interested in making characters of their own as an example of a high quality work.



Survey Response My critique was /~Devicloud on 1/16. This was not my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it was in-depth and thorough. I felt that Olly was just right during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it helpful, and would recommend that she ramble more. As for the site itself, I was satisfied with the layout. Overall, I would say that I was satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, but would recommend that Olly double-check for typos. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends.


welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

SURVEYS

Quality is very important to the hard-working staff at (H)CBO. Because of this, we please ask that every person that has been critiqued submits a survey response, and hope that visitors do so as well. To do so, please copy and paste the links in the text areas into the URL bar. The survey will already be typed out in the Neomail, with the categories listed for you to fill in. Please contact 0llyness if the links do not work.

Critiqued
Visitors


Survey Responces


Critiqued
Visitor
1.24.2013 My critique was /~Banamein on 1.23.13. This was my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it let me know how others see my page and it offered suggestions on how to improve. I felt that Olly was just right during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it entertainingly helpful, and would recommend that she ramble the same amount. As for the site itself, I was satisfied the layout (thanks for fixing the F.A.Q.!). Overall, I would say that I was satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, and would recommend that Olly give herself a pat on the back. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends, my petpage stalkers, and random people I meet on the street. My additional comments are: Thanks so much for critiquing my nontraditional page, it's great to know what's working, and what's not. Also, I'm not exactly a coding wiz, so I really appreciated your tips about justifying text and adding titles to images. Can't wait to get working on my page again! ~Bookkeeper
(H)CBO Response Thank you very much for your kind words!

1.23.2013 My critique was /~Irec on 1/23/13. This was my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it was quite apparent that Olly had spent an amazing amount of effort in wiring it and gave me precisely what I was looking for. The critique was very in-depth, precisely as it was advertised, and provided constructive criticism in all of the areas that I requested. I felt that Olly was just harsh enough, though I wouldn't have minded harsher, during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it quite helpful and entertaining, and would recommend that she ramble the same amount. As for the site itself, I was satisfied with the layout (though the frequently asked questions do not work on my browser). Overall, I would say that I was very satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, but would recommend that Olly change the FAQ section. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends. My additional comments are as follows. The critique was submitted only two days before I received a response, which is remarkably quick given how long critiques take to write and the fact that it was a weekday. Olly was very helpful, polite, and provided exactly what she claimed to with a little added entertainment thrown in to boot. Her critiques are thorough, thoughtful, and very honest. Anyone who is looking for help should look no further than this page. I'd like to thank you personally for your help. You provided me with exactly what I needed and I'll get started on making those changes. Bravo to you, and thank you again! -Tango
(H)CBO's Response We would have been harsher if we could be, but we enjoyed the content too much. We did fix the FAQ though!

1.16.2013 My critique was /~Devicloud on 1/16. This was not my first critique. I was satisfied with my critique because it was in-depth and thorough. I felt that Olly was just right during my critique. In regards to her rambling, I found it helpful, and would recommend that she ramble more. As for the site itself, I was satisfied with the layout. Overall, I would say that I was satisfied with my experience with (H)CBO, but would recommend that Olly double-check for typos. I do plan on using this critique service again, and would recommend it to my friends.
(H)CBO's Response We refuse to learn how to spell the word "purple" correctly.
1.17.2013 I ( am ) satisfied with how (H)CBO is run and ( plan ) to use its services in the future. In my opinion, Olly's critiques are ( too few in number so far ), and I ( therefore did not have the pleasure of reading much of ) her rambling. I find the layout ( easy to navigate - except for the F.A.Q. ), and ( enjoy ) the Updates. My favorite thing about (H)CBO is how it's a review site for character pages and my biggest recommendation would be for Olly to sit up straight while working at the computer (or to fix the F.A.Q. so it doesn't jump).
(H)CBO's Response Thank you very much! We have fixed the FAQ section and promise to sit up straight. We even bought a yoga ball for this very purpose!


welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What types of pages will you critique?
Character-based petpages and petpage applications for pets. In essence, I critique anything related to characters of pets, or information about the pets themselves. I do not critique sites, but I do offer account checks for prospective applicants which may involve me glancing at them.

Where are the forms for submission?
In the Styles section. However, be sure to read the rules section.

Can I request multiple critiques?
Certainly! However, I ask that you do not request more than three in a two week period. Otherwise, feel free to request to your heart's content! If you wish for me to look at a page which I have already seen, I ask that you make significant changes to it and wait at least a week before requesting for me to revisit.

What is your resolution?
I actually have two laptops and one monitor (which I connect to my laptops). The main laptop used for critiques has a resolution of 1366 x 768, and my secondary one is 1280 x 800. The monitor is significantly larger.

What made you decide to create this site?
(H)CBO began as a series of application critique boards created around the Pound Chat. I had spent plenty of time applying and seeking critiques, and found that many "ratings" and "critiques" were more or less intended to be kind and polite; something which I found had a tendency to remove the honesty. Nooblet applications for draiks were getting rated 10/10s because they tried, regardless of whether or not they were likely of being chosen, and so forth. I sought to change this. My critiques were actually among the first things I did on Neopia which earned me haters, but I have no regrets. For every ten people that hate me, there is one that actually pays attention to my ramblings, and it's worth all of the haters in the world to watch a mediocre application improve and be chosen for that high profile pet.

How do you judge the applications and petpages that you look at?
It varies. Sadly, I cannot review every single page which I look at with the same intensity; this would simply take too much time and there is too much variation in my environment. Critiques occuring when I am in a bad mood will be harsher; petpages will tend to be more lenient than applications, and so forth. I basically read through the page, typing up my commentary as I go. I do not provide a score; instead, you more or less get a list of things that I like and things that I would recommend for you to improve upon.

How long does it take for you to critique a page?
It depends on both the length of the page in question and what is going on in my life. Because of this, I require at least a week before major application deadlines unless you are a friend of mine. I will prioritize applications over petpages, sorry. Time wise, though, every critique takes me at least half an hour, but most are closer to an hour.

Will you become my affiliate?
If you are an application/petpage/coding/character-design page (or one related to it), then sure! Simply neomail 0llyness with your request and we can exchange buttons.

What suggestions can you offer to petpages and applications?
I actually plan to create a Commonly Made Mistakes in the Application Process page, so I'll answer this question more in depth then. However, be sure to formalize your diction and refrain from smilies - applications are like essays, not chatting with your friends. In the Extras section of this page, there is a section devoted to helpful pages; I would recommend that you consult them if you have questions.

What order do you read pages in?
It depends, really. Applications with one week or less until their deadline get priority, of course, as do those with under two left. After that, all applications and petpages are read in the order that they were submitted. Petpages tend to be reviewed when application deadlines are farther away.

I'm confused. Is this page run by Kads or Meepits?
President Olly is a Kad, though it is debated over whether she is a normal Kad or a faerie one. However, we may have one or two Ollies working for us that never returned to normality after our Kadventures appearance in the 500th Issue of the Neopian Times.

What makes you think that you are worthy of reading my application?
I have critiqued hundreds of applications and have been friends with dozens of high-profile pet fosters. I have been the judge for many high-end pets, and the unofficial judge for many more. Furthermore, my friends and I have been successful in at least some our own application attempts, and we have all discussed what factors we believe have led to our success.

I hate/love your critiques.
Well, unless you send me a survey, I will never know. Or pay attention. Same thing, really.

I hate you.
In the immortal words of TNT's editorial...


I have a question / I have a featured site for you.
Neomail 0llyness with it.




welcome styles rules critiques ask olly f.a.q. extras sitely contact

EXTRAS

Helpful Pages
(hover over to see why)




Fan Mail




Old Layouts


welcome styles rules critiques surveys f.a.q. extras sitely contact

SITELY

Link Back?








The Olly Network



Afflitiates



Listed At




Opened Jun 24, 2011
Reopened Feb 26, 2012
Rereopened Jan 9, 2013


Buttons link back to their creators. Bullets and mail sign from The Lunch Box. The rest of the coding and content is (c) 0llyness. None of this is free for use; stealing will be prosecuted.



NEOPETS, characters, logos, names and all related indicia
are trademarks of Neopets, Inc., © 1999-2013.
® denotes Reg. US Pat. & TM Office. All rights reserved.

PRIVACY POLICY | Safety Tips | Contact Us | About Us | Press Kit
Use of this site signifies your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions